The film industry in one place - Articles, Reviews, trailers and hype!

Wednesday, 30 March 2016

New 'The Conjuring 2' Trailer Shows the Horror of England's Amityville

The Conjuring 2 Trailer

Thanks to director James Wan, summer isn't just full of blockbuster action and tentpole kids movies. Horror fan will have something to look forward to with The Conjuring 2 giving us the next terrifying account of the supernatural, straight from the files of real life paranormal investigators Ed & Lorraine Warren. Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga are back as the paranormal expects as they head across the pond to investigate a house that has been dubbed England's Amityville. Imagine if The Exorcist was on steroids and you get an idea of what can be seen in the new trailer for this horror sequel. Watch the trailer!

Here's the new trailer for The Conjuring 2 straight from Warner Bros. Pictures:

The supernatural thriller brings to the screen another real case from the files of renowned demonologists Ed and Lorraine Warren. Reprising their roles, Oscar nominee Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson star as Lorraine and Ed Warren, who, in one of their most terrifying paranormal investigations, travel to north London to help a single mother raising four children alone in a house plagued by malicious spirits. The Conjuring 2: The Enfield Poltergeist is again directed by James Wan, of the first The Conjuring in 2013, as well as Furious 7, Death Sentence, Dead Silence, Saw and both Insidious & Insidious: Chapter 2. New Line / Warner Bros will release The Conjuring 2 in theaters everywhere starting June 10th this summer.

The Beautiful Watercolor Credits of John Cassavetes' "Gloria"

Gloria (1980) is playing on MUBI in the United Kingdom March 23 - April 22, 2016, as part of a four film retrospective on director John Cassavetes.

One of the great opening credits sequences in cinema, the watercolor titles for John Cassavete's Gloria were created by painter Romare Bearden:

Superheroes And Serious Silliness

Batman and Superman

It seems like ages since a Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) trailer’s pivotal “Ooga-chaka”s told us exactly what kind of antics we could expect from a studio superhero flick.

Of course, writer/director James Gunn’s first superhero film, the 2010 whacko and ultraviolent Super, set up the possibilities of an absurd combination of realism and comic book cartoonishness in an even darker way. When The Crimson Bolt, aka Frank D’Arbo (Rainn Wilson), fractures a man’s skull with a wrench for cutting in line, everyone is noticeably freaked out. A mentally ill person just assaulted someone over a social gaffe. It’s horrifying black humor about what happens when you try to apply superhero logic to the real world. However, in the world of Snyder’s Batman v Superman, hell, even with the deadly serious Marvel Civil War approaching, it’s easy to forget that gritty superhero flicks work best with a dash of zingy weirdness, like that in Sam Raimi’s 1990 film Darkman and the new Bohemian Rhapsodic international Suicide Squad trailer.

suicide-squad-team

Like Guardians of the Galaxy’s crew of lovable space miscreants, Darkman is kind of a dick. Peyton Westlake (Liam Neeson)’s only goal – after a convoluted attack leaves him looking like a french fry stuck to the bottom of the greasy fryer basket – is to make his attacker, sadistic gangster Durant (Larry Drake), and his men pay. One scene sees him shoving an interogee’s head through a busy street’s manhole. “I’ve told you everything!” the goon says. “I know,” Westlake growls, “but let’s pretend you didn’t”. The unfortunate henchmen meets a tire shortly after.

Yet the movie, while focusing on a purely selfish hero’s origin story, has the good sense to incorporate goofy stylistic elements (seen to great effect in Raimi’s Evil Dead movies) to keep the viewer in a state of fun. It’s often dour and Liam Neeson is quite bad as an alternatively grating breathless spastic and growling psychopath, but oddball sensibility breaks through despite it all. The film is full of murder, and like Tim Burton’s Batman – Raimi’s Darkman’s contemporary – it’s because their dark tone doesn’t equal realism. Darkman is unhinged, actually acknowledged to have emotional problems that stem from the same operation that gave him super strength. Burton’s Batman broods in a phallic Art Deco nightmare, his slick, impersonal kills as over-the-top and weird as the rest of Burton’s signature flair.

Darkman’s The Invisible Man-style bandages and long dilapidated trench-coat twirl about in lieu of a cape as he rushes around the condemned factory he calls home. Plenty of the pipes, steam, fire, machinery, and steel-grate walkways familiar to ‘80s action fans fill the space to its brim, bestowing the fights there and those at the skyscraper-set climax with angular urban decay. This final battle isn’t so much to save his girlfriend (Frances McDormand) as it is to slaughter all the goons, leaving her saved as a pleasant side effect. At the same time, however, Darkman is constantly peeling off silly rubbery-looking masks, confronting henchmen as their facial double, and having psychedelic freakouts at carnivals:

Darkman

The realistic elements heighten the fantastic, letting us applaud and laugh at the grotesque and violent oddities rather than embrace it as part of our world. A purely dark tone has only ever aided the clinical filmmaking of Christopher Nolan and his Dark Knight trilogy. That same seriousness towards consequences, violence, and a maturing audience can still be applied to superhero films, but unless some of the comic makes its way in, the fun sucks right out of the atmosphere, leaving us with the kind of joyless husk parodied by Deadpool. It also bears mentioning that Deadpool, from its horribly scarred revenge-seeking lead to its industrial park fight scenes, most closely parodies Darkman’s serious aspects.

Parodies notwithstanding, there’s still fun to be had. Like with Guardians, whenever we seem to get too bogged down in our own self-serious super-refuse, an enterprising trailer set to something other than a largo, minor key pop remix (thank god) comes along.

It may not come out until August 5th, but Suicide Squad’s new international trailer follows the Raimi and Gunn formula for dark fun quite well.

Will Smith’s Deadshot lock-and-loading to the beat after being tackled and nightsticked by prison guards is the same kind of empathetic espièglerie that attracts comic-loving kids and action fans alike. We know he can pull of being an empowered dirtbag thanks to Hancock (another superhero film that ascribes too much realism to its heroes to be much fun), but here his charisma seems well-placed as guns blast, glass breaks, and almost everyone gets punched.

Yet two sequences of violent montages are undercut with the finishing shots: the first, a series of punches culminating in Quinn’s hair puff, and the second a series of screams and gun cocks interrupted by Jai Courtney’s Captain Boomerang cracking open a soda. The most charming I’ve ever seen Jai Courtney be is this two second bit of him goofing off, which is exactly what something starring Jared Leto’s method-acted Joker needs. Margot Robbie’s Harley Quinn provides an almost innocuous bookend when things get too heavy. Waving on an elevator, blowing the hair out of her eyes, and stealing a purse from a storefront, she’s tempering the audience’s expectations of seriousness as she tames her cohorts: “We’re bad guys. It’s what we do”.

Suicide Squad Tea

A little silliness goes a long way, especially when your audience is on the hook for two hours of mayhem. Enjoyment get bogged down in something like Batman v. Superman production designer Patrick Tatopoulos’s generic troll slop. The least fun movie to watch, or comic to read, is something gray, lifeless, and self-serious, like a smushed collage of soggy newsprint.

Remedial Film School: A Conversation About Spielberg’s Empire of the Sun

Empire of the Sun

I am a film critic, but almost all of the movies I watch are new releases. That is going to change. With Jeff Bayer’s Remedial Film School a notable film critic or personality will assign me (and you) one film per month.  Matt Patches from Thrillist Entertainment is our guest, and he chose Empire of the Sun (currently available to rent on Amazon, iTunes and more). Each section begins with a quote from the film.

“I can bring everyone back. Everyone.” (Patches Explains): Seeing Empire of the Sun does not glow in my memory. Like so many, Steven Spielberg was the first director I admired and the first filmography I vowed to plough through. If I had to guess, I rented Empire from Blockbuster, grabbed my high school girlfriend, curled up on her basement couch, and spent two and a half hours ignoring her advances in favor of a wartime coming of age story. I’m sorry, but you don’t “chill” during Spielberg.

Empire of the Sun is a Very Good Movie, and the better you know Spielberg’s work, the more its trope-subverting nooks and crannies reward. Instead of extraterrestrials or robots, Christian Bale’s scamp, Jim Graham, the quintessential Spielberg boy, deals with the ripples of war. His ambling adventure is terrifying, and tragically beautiful. Every time I watch it, I’m reduced to my 12-year-old self, feeling as lost as this rambunctious Welsh kid. Spielberg fully realizes the smoldering, Chinese neighborhoods and the Japanese internment camps. The bullets and explosions distance themselves from Indiana Jones through the wide-eyed perspective. They have weight. The situation is impossible and true. John Williams score contemplates the operatic situation, Spielbergian hope backed by a choir of the dead. I haven’t even mentioned John Malkovich. This is a beautiful movie.

But Very Good is only enough to land at the bottom of Spielberg’s grand spectrum. Jeff, people throw around words like “lesser,” “minor,” and “miss” when they talk about Empire of the Sun. Maybe that’s OK, who knows. But to understand and appreciate our masters, we need to see these works on the same level as the classics. What separates Empire of the Sun from E.T.JawsRaiders, and Schindler’s List? And does it impact the quality? You tell me.

“You taught me that people will do anything for a potato.” (Bayer watches): Before we get to the film, I think it’s most impressive that you were able to squeeze in how a high school girl was trying to make out with a high school Patches, but you wouldn’t allow it. You stood strong in your movie-focused youth. I kept pushing a girl off me during Bram Stoker’s Dracula. And look at us now! Sigh.

Sadly, I can’t compare this film with Schindler’s List as I haven’t seen it. I don’t have a great excuse. After I missed its normal film window, I never felt like it was a movie I should randomly sit down and watch alone. Years ago, I decided I’d watch it for the first time with my kid, but now that I have two boys, and this article (which will probably continue for decades), it feels like the time is nigh… And this is the first time I’ve ever written that word, so big things are happening all around.

Is Christian Bale the greatest actor of all time? Sincerely. I’m asking. He’s had the most success (box office, quality, etc.) within the broadest or longest age range, right? Is that his real singing voice? Do I actually have to watch Newsies now? How many Academy Awards did this film get nominated for and then actually win? So many questions.

Another thing, this is before Bale’s inner-eye mole, which I can’t stop starring whenever he has a close up. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, you probably don’t want to hear about Tom Cruise’s middle tooth either.

I’m really having a tough time registering Bale. Josh Brolin can’t go two interviews without people bringing up Goonies. But for some reason Bale doesn’t get that treatment for nailing his performance, and leading this film. With all of that said, has Bale improved as an actor? This isn’t a diss. There just seems to be so much “adult” Bale in this young performance, that it feels like he was born with it. And I never believe or say about an actor or athlete.

Jim has the wonder of the world, in insane, hard-wrenching situations. He wants to excel within his situation, no matter how dire it is. It’s respectable and a little insane. That’s the power of youth. He is in a fairy tale, and thankfully, he kind of knows it. There are glimpses, and then an over-the-top stereotypically tracking shot that showcases every possible class of people for the time period.

He watches war with such joy. You mentioned Indiana Jones and I will say that in two scenes it feels like he definitely taps into that mode. There’s the chase scene with a character constantly shouting “English Boy,” and also setting the quail traps. While I don’t feel either scene is bad, they are simply too long. Spielberg is too excited to play with the tension instead of getting back to the story at hand.

Then there are the great performances by Joe Pantoliano and John Malkovich. I wasn’t sure Pantolinao was still alive. Are you? It’s always amazing to see Malkovich before he started playing himself in films. Months back, Nathan Rabin had me watch The Dead Zone. It was obvious that this was the beginning of “Crazy” Walken. Here, Malkovich isn’t nuts yet, and damn is he good. What was the Malkovich performance that made the “crazy” leap?

I was consistently invested in this film, even when I was surprised to be at the interment camp in ’45 for a while. That has a lot to do with the scope that Spielberg and his team created. The big thing I kept noticing was the extras. So many extras. These are shots now that are filled in with CGI crowds and it rightfully feels less impressive. Plus that one particular stadium shot with the furniture, cars, and piano had me simply happy to look around at my screen. Then, suddenly, I changed from being impressed and interested to emotionally torn apart at the end. I had tears. My soul was crushed. That was the power of Bale (and Spielberg).

OK, here’s a bunch of little things. Answer or add to any or all of these random thoughts.

Ben Stiller shows up at the one hour and 17 minute mark. It took me a while to refocus.

The film is bookended with coffins getting knocked round by a big ship, and then Jim’s suitcase floating in the water. Does this mean the painful situation is dead? Do you think it means something else?

When in his idyllic childhood home, Jim opens the fridge. There are numerous desserts, and piles of meat and cheese. Is this the best-stocked movie fridge of all time? My vote is currently yes, but I have no idea what second place would be. I just never remember being so jealous of the inside of a movie refrigerator.

Was he drunk on alcoholic chocolate? If so, this is Spielberg’s biggest missed opportunity. First he had Elliot in E.T., then this could have been his “I get kids to pretend they’re drunk” corner.

In the scene when he chucks his suitcase into the water, we see a small sailboat. Why didn’t he or anybody else take that? After all, the suitcase ends up in the river at the end.

There’s a beautiful poster of Gone with the Wind, which stands out for me, because it’s another film I haven’t seen. But who has 7 hours and 25 minutes for one movie?

At the end of the film we see Christina Bale listed in the credits with, “And Introducing.” I wish there was a website that dedicated itself only to “And Introducing,” “With,” and “And” roles. Who is the greatest of all time? How do they contractually get decided? I want to know all of this instantly (without having to do the work myself).

Movie Score: 9/10

Amatus sum, amatus es, amatus est.” (Patches responses): I know you’re a man of many questions, Jeff, and what I adore about Empire of the Sun is that it begs you to ask them. Like I said, it’s a nooks and crannies movie. From the English life embedded in Shanghai, to the actual internment camp existence, spirituality and humanity is in the details — even an overstuffed refrigerator (and one of film history’s best — need to rewatch Spanglish to confirm). I could spend all day scrutinizing the early sequences of the costume party or looping our first introduction to Jim’s prison routine, a long run through camp that bids “good day!” to its many inhabitants. Empire of the Sun is like a Where’s Waldo where the hidden figure is historical understanding.

You do have to watch Newsies, Jeff, and you do have to admit that Bale — with Philip Seymour Hoffman sadly out of the picture — is in the “top three actors currently working today” category. The electricity between him, Pantoliano (where you go, dude?), and pre-Being John Malkovich Malkovich (the one-two punch of that and Con Air sent him barreling into crazy town) recharges in every scene of this movie. But wait! Kids can’t act. They do what they’re told — or so say many skeptics. Where do you stand? Bale might be great now, but is he working on another level or following a laser pointer? Can we tell? What are the greatest kid performances and where does he fall now?

I love that the sheer amount of extras kept you absorbed, at least for awhile. Why did Spielberg even make this movie? What’s his personal connection? Do you see his recurring themes? From the profile writing I can scrounge up from back in the day, Spielberg saw a David Lean-esque epic in J.G. Ballard’s autobiography-with-a-twist novel (and then beat Lean out to direct the movie). It sounds like he loved the backdrop and loved the excuse to accurately portray the larger-than-life experience. Maybe Spielberg sees himself in Jim. If he was a 10-year-old during World War II, he may have been enamored by the white light of an atomic bomb drop, too. Maybe that’s why he nuked the fridge in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Spielberg clearly loves the P-51 plane action. I was reminded of The Wind Rises both while watching the movie again, and thinking about Spielberg. If you love epic visuals, you can be both taken and terrified of Earth’s manmade leviathans.

Throwing Ben Stiller a cameo probably made a lot of sense in 1987.

Jeff, you gave this movie a higher score than I thought you would. I think the general consensus is that Empire of the Sun misses the mark because it’s languid. I would obviously disagree; “Coffins in the water” is a great example of a meditative, gut-wrenching visual, and then circling back to it with Jim’s suitcase ties the whole thing together. To come of age is to die a little bit. On the scale of Empire of the Sun, it’s a much grander, deadlier evolution. But maybe Spielberg could have raced towards that conclusion, tightened up the plotting and weaved the themes through the entire picture. So that’s my final question to you: we’re obsessed with every little choice in the movie, but when you zoom out, is there a mosaic? And is it weird that the interment camp looks more fun than the Lost Boys camp in Hook?

“Excuse me everyone, I surrender.” (Bayer concludes): Patches, now I just want to play the Maybe game with you about every movie, and thank you for the Lean factoid. It’s funny you bring up Spanglish, because it’s the only movie in which I’ve copied a recipe. That simple sandwich Adam Sandler makes is amazing, and probably his greatest gift to cinema.

I mainly agree that kids can’t act. The best kid performances typically come from children who appear to be acting normal, only less annoying (all kids are annoying). Recently, Mud was amazing because it felt like Tye Sheridan and Jacob Lofland were being some version of themselves. Even with Jacob Tremblay in Room, there were moments that felt a bit too much like a performance. My hunch with Bale is that he actually just recently transported back in time, into his former self, nailed the performance, then came back to 2016. But again, it’s just a hunch.

With Spielberg, it’s so interesting to make this film after The Color Purple. You could tell he was clinging to hope and joy within this desperate world. He sometimes squeezed it in where it didn’t belong. I think people would actually pay money to stay at the “Empire of the Sun Interment Camp” for a week. I can’t think of another director who would have made this movie with the attempt of “fun.”

The thing I can’t figure out is, what is Jim like after this experience? It doesn’t feel like he’s necessarily hardened as much as someone else would be. Will he be content being taken care of once again? He’s already led a more difficult life that imaginable, but will the rest of his days bore him? Spielberg doesn’t paint the perfect picture of Jim’s arc within the film. It’s almost just like he knew in order to get through these days, we needed a plucky leader. Thankfully, Bale was the man (child).

Your Next Assignment: Guest comedian Doug Benson (Doug Loves Movies) selected Used Cars. It is available to rent on Amazon, Google Play, and iTunes. Your due date is April 28, 2016.

24 Things We Learned From Ben Affleck’s Gone Baby Gone Commentary

commentary Gone Baby Gone

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is still pulling in the cash in theaters, but it’s generating even more in the way of extreme reactions. One of the few areas audiences seem to agree on is that Ben Affleck gives a solid performance as the more mature but far angrier Batman/Bruce Wayne. That’s a good thing too as he’s scheduled to reprise the role in at least four more films.

Affleck is also set to direct one of those features, the standalone Batman reboot, and we can all probably agree that that’s good news as well. He’s only directed three previous films — a fourth, Live By Night, is due in 2017 — but all three have been varying degrees of fantastic. His first film, 2007’s Gone Baby Gone, remains his best and delivers a rare mix of thrills and affecting character drama. That ending — even on repeat viewings it hits with a painful beauty.

Keep reading to see what I heard on the Gone Baby Gone commentary.

Gone Baby Gone (2007)

Commentators: Ben Affleck (director/co-writer), Aaron Stockard (co-writer)

1. The opening montage is just a collection of images they picked up featuring real people around Dorcester. Affleck loves the one of the woman standing there as smoke rises from the bottom of the screen. The goal was to “ground the audience in the setting” but also to refute stereotypes about Boston’s racial make-up.

2. The first scene with Patrick Kenzie (Casey Affleck) and Angie Gennaro (Michelle Monaghan) was part of a re-shoot as they played around with ideas on how the film should begin. “This is the fourth book in a series,” says Affleck, referring to author Dennis Lehane‘s “Kenzie & Gennaro” series currently sitting at six titles, “and the book really starts off with you understanding a lot about the characters and the world because you’ve read the other books.”

3. One of the changes they made from the novel was adjusting the private eyes’ ages from being in their 40s to being in their 30s, “but that presented its own challenges,” says Stockard.

4. The b&w photo on Kenzie & Gennaro’s wall is of the couple that the ABC series Hart to Hart was based on. Stockard asks why it’s there, to which Affleck replies “We just did it.”

5. The close-up of Monaghan around ten minutes in is a re-shoot that required some special effects wizardry. She had moved on to her next movie (The Heartbreak Kid) and had cut her bangs, “so we had to put a little net in to match her bangs, and you could see the net, so we had to use special effects and paint in on her bangs.”

6. Lionel McCready (Titus Welliver) is sporting that mustache because Welliver had just come off Deadwood, so they trimmed it slightly to make it look like a middle-aged biker.

Miramax

Miramax

7. Affleck worried about a shot of Jerry Springer on Helene McCready’s (Amy Ryan) TV thinking it might be too cliched, but “literally one in every two houses that I went into had Springer on while we were scouting in the afternoon.”

8. The extra with the hole in his throat was in the bar when they arrived for shooting so Affleck just asked him to stay. The man moving quickly behind him is actually Affleck who was passing by unaware they were grabbng the shot. Stockard wonders if this is Affleck’s stab at a Hitchcock cameo, but the director denies it.

9. “That Skippy jar line was an improvisation courtesy of Big Dave (William Lee),” says Affleck.

10. Corwin Earle is played by Matthew Maher who went to high school with both Afflecks, Stockard, and Matt Damon.

11. Both men love John Ashton, but while Stockard remembers him best from the Beverly Hills Cop films Affleck leans more Midnight Run with his affection.

12. They received some notes on Patrick, the film’s lead protagonist, and how maybe he shouldn’t be using questionable language and terminology, but “I just thought those kinds of rules versus the reality of the characters, you have to let the reality win out.”

Tuesday, 29 March 2016

Let’s Get Back to Celebrating the Success of Deadpool

DP009

Most box office reporting is just spin, but on occasion there is something genuinely newsworthy in the world of theatrical grosses. Any claims that Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is a box office success is a perpetuation of the studio’s damage control. Its actual figures from its opening weekend are lower than the initially announced estimates. And its true tally is a huge disappointment for what was once viewed as the most exciting venture in blockbuster cinema history, bringing together the iconic titular DC Comics heroes on the big screen for the first time.

Compare Batman v Superman‘s $166m to the $222m (adjusted for inflation) earned by The Avengers four years ago with historically less-famous characters united on film (last year’s less-popular sequel Avengers: Age of Ultron also performed better with $193m). Plus, Batman v Superman had one of the worst Friday-to-Sunday drop-offs ever — the worst for a superhero movie, in fact, worse than last year’s Fantastic Four. It happened in other parts of the world, too, including China. One analyst is predicting Batman v Superman could even fall below Man of Steel in both its domestic and global take. That’s pretty bad.

Let’s all just sweep the thing under the rug a moment, shall we? Let’s instead look at the truly remarkable box office success of Deadpool. Now, I’ll admit that its latest achievement, that it has broken the world record for highest-grossing R-rated release, is complicated and potentially misleading in its spin. All international numbers are to be taken with a grain of salt due to the ever-increasing global markets and audiences. But in this situation, the international numbers for previous record-holder The Matrix Reloaded are much higher than Deadpool‘s while the latter’s domestic gross wins without inflation adjustment, giving the appearance of a higher total.

Domestically, Deadpool still looks like it’s in third place for domestic R-rated grosses. However, again, that’s just unadjusted. Otherwise it’s 19th. No matter the adjustment, though, the movie holds the record for greatest domestic R-rated opening weekend. Of course, many of its competitors in that contest that wound up with more money in the long run were released at a time of fewer screens and more opening-weekend sell-outs as a result. Finally, like the excitement about Batman v Superman breaking records for March, Deadpool being the champ for February isn’t really a big accomplishment.

View post on imgur.com

I have to clarify all the above, because I need to be realistic about both movies before addressing just how much greater the Deadpool situation is regardless of its obligatory spin. Go back just a few months and you’d have trouble finding anyone guessing Deadpool would be a big hit, let alone such an enormous success as it is. Or that it would be the more impressive box office story compared with Batman v Superman. There are actually good odds that Deadpool could even come out with higher numbers in all regards by the end of their respective theatrical runs. Not that it matters except for show, anyway. Costing only $58m versus Batman v Superman‘s $250m, Deadpool is already a clear winner in terms of its profit.

Did the positive reviews help in the success of Deadpool? I don’t think they necessarily made the movie a hit, but they surely aided in the initial buzz. That it has had legs, though, is more to do with it being an entertaining movie with positive word of mouth and a fun tone that welcomes repeat viewings for anyone looking for a good time. Similarly, but in an inverse manner, the negative reviews of Batman v Superman didn’t mean an immediate disaster for its opening weekend, because it was always going to do a lot of business pretty much on its title alone, though I do believe the critics crippled it somewhat. The movie’s lack of legs, due to bad word of mouth and its not being an enjoyable re-watch at all, will be its ultimate downfall.

At a time when movies are hyped to death for years leading up to their release and then quickly forgotten about right away, it’s interesting that Deadpool is still going strong at the box office and in the cultural conversation. But the latest superhero movie did hijack it’s attention for a moment, hopefully only a brief one. I’m already worn out from the discussion points regarding Batman v Superman on all fronts, yet I’m at least still enjoying the social media presence of Deadpool and whatever dialogue about the movie arises, seven weeks later.

So, now that the nightmare-filled nightmare of Batman v Superman has come and all but already gone, join me in getting back to celebrating and talking about Deadpool. At least for another six weeks until Captain America: Civil War arrives and distracts us once again. It will be interesting to see, given that Deadpool opened bigger than and has completely out-grossed both of the previous Captain America movies but also given the fact that Civil War is more like an Avengers movie and also has Spider-Man, if it still holds strongest. Probably not, but it will still remain the most astonishing and noteworthy superhero success of the year.

One Scene, Two Perspectives: Better Call Saul And The Importance of Context

better-call-saul-mike-tio-1

The following are two descriptions of the final scene of the Better Call Saul episode “Rebecca,” the fifth episode of the second season. The point of this exercise is the effect of context on the experience of watching a given sequence of film. Version A is told from the perspective of someone starting Better Call Saul without having watched Breaking Bad, whereas Version B is how it looks when one starts the other way around. When both series exist in their entirety, the choice to watch one or the other first will inevitably affect the way certain scenes land emotionally, although all the tangible, permanent details are identical.

Version A

better-call-saul-mike-tio-2

Mike Ehrmantraut, a retired Philadelphia cop now working as a parking lot attendant at a municipal building in Albuquerque, has been finding himself inching by spiritual inertia toward his new city’s criminal element. Recently, he did a favor for an ambitious drug lieutenant named Nacho, whose taste for lieutenancy was minimal, which led to Mike taking a beating from Nacho’s boss Tuco. This led Tuco to be arrested and sent to prison for a very long stretch for carrying a gun he wasn’t supposed to be carrying (in the eyes of the law), thus sparing Nacho the inconvenience of being murdered, presumably elevating Nacho to top dog status, and leaving Mike with a set of contusions that serve only to enhance his generally battered, stubbornly alive affect.

As the scene begins in earnest, Mike is sitting in his favorite coffee shop, in a booth at the window. He is right-center in the frame, the depth of focus shallow, ending just over Mike’s shoulder. A man enters the coffee shop in that part of the frame. He is blurry, but his posture looks familiar. He saunters over to Mike’s table and asks “Mind if I join you?” in a thick Mexican accent. Mike does not recognize the man, but he recognizes that it is not really a request. He introduces himself as Tuco’s uncle. He affects an apologetic, respectful tone, but it slowly becomes apparent that this is a means to convince Mike to go along with a scheme to reduce Tuco’s prison time, which involves Mike telling the cops Tuco’s gun was really his. He assures Mike that his ex-cop status—a subtle revelation that he knows exactly who Mike is, absent of any overt threat—will ensure lenient treatment, and offers Mike $5000 to play along, although it’s not really an offer. He asks Mike to “think about it,” although Mike is not really being asked, but told. The scene ends with a cut to silent credits, and the certainty that Mike’s life has just gotten extremely complicated.

Version B

better-call-saul-mike-tio-3

Mike, being Mike, is looking a little worse for wear, as Saul/Jimmy noted earlier in the episode. He isn’t so much breaking bad as he is bending perceptibly. He heaves a big, weary Mike sigh. Someone, out of focus, walks into the coffee shop. He moves like Tuco . . . but it can’t be Tuco, Tuco’s inside. Nacho’s plan worked perfectly. But that guy sure does move like Tuco.

The guy comes over and sits down at Mike’s table. We see his face for the first time . . . it’s Hector Salamanca. Holy shit. He hasn’t had his stroke yet but he still has that patented Hector Salamanca lip twitch, fuel of a thousand nightmares. Even scarier, Hector is unfailingly, elegantly polite to Mike. Mike being Mike, he may not know that this is Hector Salamanca but he knows in a broader, poetic sense that this is Hector Salamanca. Mike has not made it this far without learning how to read a chess board.

And with just as little fanfare as he arrived, Hector leaves, and the silent credits drive home the inevitability of Mike’s inexorable glide toward the Salamanca organization, and the not-yet-glimpsed-in-the-prequel Gus Fring.

Not to beat the point into the ground, this radical difference between experiences of a given piece is true, to varying extents, of all cinema and indeed all art. Whether you see a film for the first time on a big screen on 35mm, or on your laptop. Whether you see a highly referential film before or after you see all the films it references. And so on. This isn’t the most profound point in the history of points, but it’s something to always keep in mind.

Anyway, the more important thing is that Better Call Saul is delightful.

Copyright © Cinenus | Powered by Blogger

Design by Anders Noren | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com