The film industry in one place - Articles, Reviews, trailers and hype!

Saturday 18 July 2020

The Difference Between Queer Coding and Queerbaiting

Welcome to The Queue — your daily distraction of curated video content sourced from across the web. Today, we’ve got a video about the difference between queer coding and queerbaiting.


Look, it says it right there at the top of the page: we are film school rejects. Academic theory can feel obtuse and inaccessible. Luckily, the internet is full of talented creators who excel at untangling tricky terminology and empowering folks to feel more informed about the content they consume.

I’d heard the terms “queer coding” and “queerbaiting” before. But I would have struggled if you asked me to explain the difference between the two. So, what’s the difference between queer coding and queerbaiting? And, more to the point, what can that difference teach us about the history of queer representation and the censorship of queer stories?

The feature-length video essay below answers these questions and then some. It is, effectively, a free documentary about how the subtle queer nods of the Pre-Code era evolved into a troubling modern pattern of media that draws in queer audiences without committing to queer storylines. This is an exceptionally structured video essay. And, as a result, it’s length never feels rambling or indulgent. For anyone curious about the terms, their origins, and their modern iterations, this video has you covered.

You can watch Unrequited: A History of Queer Baiting” here:


Who made this?

In the past couple of years, James Somerton has cornered/created the market for long-form video essays with a queer lens. You can subscribe to Somerton here. And you can follow him on Twitter here.

More Videos Like This

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Copyright © Cinenus | Powered by Blogger

Design by Anders Noren | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com