The follow-up to the 2006 Oscar winner fails to engage in a fully realized discourse on climate change.
Sundance 2017: A Rather Inconvenient Sequel
Friday, 20 January 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Welcome to Commentary Commentary, where we sit and listen to filmmakers talk about their work, then share the most interesting parts. In t...
-
What is a “spiritual sequel”? Basically, it’s any work that seems connected enough to another but isn’t directly linked by characters or an...
-
The train has stood the test of time as a storytelling device throughout pretty much all of film history. On screen, locomotion can propel n...
-
It is time for the most important debate of our lives. Is Netflix really, truly good for cinema? In all honesty, there is no answer to thi...
-
Kristin here: Flicker Alley continues to bring out an eclectic and unpredictable series of restored films, from French Impressionist class...
-
Quentin Tarantino ’s films are often hailed for their quotable dialogue, wild violence, pop culture references, and eclectic ensembles compr...
-
We here at Film School Rejects love film festivals of all kinds, but if pressed I’d gleefully admit that genre fests — ones that celebrate ...
-
DB here: Wes Anderson is back on our blog. I composed a 2007 entry that tried to trace the stylistic tradition he belongs to (slogani...
-
Watchmen (2019), Episode 7. DB here: If we want to understand the craft of filmmaking, we should pay attention to what filmmakers say ab...
-
Welcome to How’d They Do That? — a monthly column that unpacks moments of movie magic and celebrates the technical wizards who pulled them ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment