The film industry in one place - Articles, Reviews, trailers and hype!

Sunday 31 May 2020

Trailer for Lin-Manuel Miranda's 'We Are Freestyle Love Supreme' Doc

We Are Freestyle Love Supreme Doc Trailer

"And here we are, 15 years later…" Hulu has unveiled an official trailer for an indie documentary titled We Are Freestyle Love Supreme, which originally premiered at the Sundance Film Festival earlier this year. Before the world knew of the Broadway musicals In The Heights and Hamilton, Lin-Manuel Miranda started an improv hip-hop group called "Freestyle Love Supreme" (aka FLS). This doc film chronicles the group's 15-year journey, culminating with shows in 2019. They just finished their final show on Broadway earlier this year. "Filmmaker Andrew Fried began with a small SD camera in the summer of 2005, capturing the early days of Freestyle Love Supreme beatboxing on the sidewalks—unaware of how their story would unfold. Fourteen years later, after directing famed series like "Chef's Table" and "7 Days Out", Fried revisits old footage to craft this fated story. Both poignant and inspired, We Are Freestyle Love Supreme recalls the creative dreams of youth and why this project still means so much to these accomplished performers." Yep.

Official trailer (+ poster) for Andrew Fried's doc We Are Freestyle Love Supreme, on Hulu's YouTube:

We Are Freestyle Love Supreme Poster

Description from Sundance: "Well before the world knew of the award-winning Broadway musicals In The Heights and Hamilton, a young, bright-eyed Lin-Manuel Miranda was in an improv hip-hop group called Freestyle Love Supreme, along with director Thomas Kail and performers Christopher Jackson and Anthony Veneziale. Freestyle Love Supreme was a way for these carefree artists out of college to experiment with theatre and craft their own unique musical sound. This film chronicles a 15-year journey of twists and turns, friendship, and unprecedented musical talent—culminating with much-anticipated reunion performances in New York City in 2019." We Are Freestyle Love Supreme is directed by American TV producer / filmmaker Andrew Fried, making his feature directorial debut after one short and lots of other TV work previously. This initially premiered at the Sundance Film Festival earlier this year as a "Special Event". Hulu will debut the We Are Freestyle Love Supreme doc streaming starting on June 5th coming up. Who wants to watch?

Watch ‘Uncut Gems,’ Then Watch These Movies

Welcome to Movie DNA, a column that recognizes the direct and indirect cinematic roots of new movies. Learn some film history, become a more well-rounded viewer, and enjoy likeminded works of the past.


Josh and Benny Safdie‘s Uncut Gems has been a long time coming, both in its many years of development and in its culmination of the filmmakers’ influences and the work they and star Adam Sandler had done leading up to its production. Uncut Gems is first and foremost inspired by stories the Safdie brothers heard from their father, who worked in New York City’s Diamond District. It also involves their favorite sport, basketball, and the grittier kind of portrayal of the Big Apple seen in the classic crime films they grew up with.

Uncut Gems has also seemed like a long wait for its arrival on Netflix in the US. Following its premiere at the Telluride Film Festival in August 2019, the movie debuted in American theaters in mid-December with a wide release expansion happening on Christmas Day. Its $50 million domestic gross marked it as a big hit for an indie film and especially for US distributor A24, though its acclaim and box office success wasn’t enough to garner any love at the Oscars, and afterward, its buzz appeared to be waning when it dropped on home video.

The rest of the world was able to see it for themselves when Netflix, its international distribution partner, put the movie out at the end of January. Subscribers in the US finally got to stream Uncut Gems starting on May 25, and the movie quickly shot to the top of the chart of the service’s most-watched titles. Whether its many millions of new viewers are mostly overwhelmed by its intensity or have fallen for the thrills and dramas of Howard Ratner and feel at least Sandler was robbed of Academy Awards recognition, it’s definitely making a strong impact.

If you’re reading this, you’re presumably one of those who like the movie and want to see more films of its ilk. Or, you at least want to know some of its back story in the form of what the Safdies were watching and thinking about during the conception and production of Uncut Gems. Sure, there are some obvious precursors, but you’re likely to be surprised by most of what’s on the list. I’m also excluding other Safdie films (though Daddy Longlegs and their basketball documentary Lenny Cooke are part of its DNA) and past Sandler movies (all are significant).

Louis Theroux: Gambling in Las Vegas (2007)

In an interview for NYC-based movie theater The Metrograph, Josh Safdie admits that a lot of the influences that “shaped” Uncut Gems were indirect and mostly literary. But there were also films that directly influenced the brothers, including a couple of documentaries that “would be very confusing to some” viewers if put down on paper (as we’re sort of doing here). One of those mentioned in the interview is this medium-length film by Louis Theroux and Stuart Cabb.

If you’re not familiar with Theroux, he’s a British-American documentary journalist personality who broke out of Michael Moore’s TV Nation series. He examines a lot of American stories for British television but is best known in the States for tackling the Church of Scientology in the recent feature My Scientology Movie (which is also on Netflix). Louis Theroux: Gambling in Las Vegas is exactly what it sounds like: Theroux on-screen meeting high roller gamblers in Vegas. It’s casino-centric so it’s mostly relevant to the Mohegan Sun scenes of Uncut Gems.


Porn King: The Trials of Al Goldstein (2004)

The Safdies have named a number of comedic Jewish celebrities as inspirations for the lead character of Uncut Gems, but Al Goldstein is one of only two specific personalities directly discussed, according to Josh Safdie in an interview for Cinema Scope magazine. Goldstein was not a comedian by profession, but the pornography mogul, best known for co-founding the publication Screw and hosting the NYC public access talk show Midnight Blue, was often compared to old Jewish performers as well as “blue” stand-up comics like Lenny Bruce.

Like Bruce, Goldstein was often arrested on obscenity charges, and his legal troubles continued almost through the end of his life. Porn King: The Trials of Al Goldstein (also known as Goldstein: The Trials of the Sultan of Smut) focuses on these legal troubles and was released around the time Goldstein’s empire went bankrupt and he lost everything. The film is not exactly a high-quality production, but it functions fine was a spotlight on the profound and profane man whom you’ll definitely see as a model for the Howard character in Uncut Gems.


Heidi Fleiss: Hollywood Madam (1995)

Here is the other documentary cited in the Metrograph interview. Heidi Fleiss: Hollywood Madam is directed by English filmmaker Nick Broomfield, who is also a prominent purveyor of the first-person investigative style, similar to Theroux. He has also been a controversial figure in the documentary scene for paying people to participate in his films, and you can see that done on screen for full transparency in this one. A lot of Broomfield’s docs of the ’90s and early 2000s involve sensational stories straight out of the tabloids and feature shady and/or criminal characters.

Fleiss, the main subject of this feature, became famous for running a large prostitution ring. However, despite her operations being part of a world that most people aren’t familiar with and also similarly having her share of celebrity clientele, she’s not the reason that the Safdies acknowledge this documentary as an influence on Uncut Gems. It’s her ex-boyfriend, the convicted bookie turned movie director Ivan Nagy (Skinner), who stuck out in their minds and became a major inspiration for Sandler’s character in their movie. Watch him on screen here and you’ll recognize the sleazy charm as well as the reason Sandler wore fake teeth to play Howard.

“There’s this character [in Heidi Fleiss: Hollywood Madam], Ivan Nagy, and he’s just got this smile. And it’s infectious,” Benny Safdie explains of the choice in a Fresh Air interview on NPR. “And at any moment, he turns it on, even in the worst situations. And it was so interesting. And I don’t know, and then we tried it out. We did a bunch — five months before we were shooting — we did a bunch of tests just to see how these things would feel.”


Hero (1992)

Dustin Hoffman’s portrayal of Lenny Bruce in the 1974 biopic Lenny might have been another influence on the Howard character in Uncut Gems, but a different Hoffman role has been explicitly recognized instead. In the Metrograph interview, Josh Safdie reveals, “There’s a film that we kept recalling that we were talking about a few months ago and it’s Stephen Frears’ Hero with Geena Davis and Dustin Hoffman. The guy is so flawed, but you love him. This guy who just wanted to just do this thing, but he has these weird principles that he stands by.”

Inspired by the works of Preston Sturges and Frank Capra, Hero follows Hoffman as a lowlife who saves a bunch of people from a plane crash but also steals from them. He can’t take credit for being a hero and becomes annoyed when a homeless guy he knows (Andy Garcia) steps up to receive the spotlight and reward for the incredible deed. Both of the main male characters are morally corrupt, and that’s what makes them so interesting. Of course, audiences want likable more than interesting, so Hero bombed at the box office. It’s not exactly on par with the actions of Howard in Uncut Gems, but Josh Safdie says it’s just one of those movies they watched as kids and “you can’t get over them.”


Easy Money (1983)

Rodney Dangerfield, who actually played Sandler’s grandfather (Lucifer) in Little Nicky, is the other Jewish celebrity discussed by the Safdies as a model for Howard in Uncut Gems., per the Cinema Scope interview. “What made [Sandler] so perfect for Howard, and why we wanted him from the beginning, was that even if he’s not likable, he’s lovable,” Josh Safdie explains. “He’s constantly making people laugh, making weird little jokes. He’s a Rodney Dangerfield in that regard, and Rodney was the reason we have Adam Sandler: he watched Rodney as a little kid.”

In Easy Money, Dangerfield’s first big movie on his own as a star, is the best evidence that the comedian shares some DNA with Sandler as Howard. Josh Safdie even told The AV Club, “The only other person who could have played this part is Rodney Dangerfield before his break in Easy Money. Like, eight or nine years before Easy Money.” The Uncut Gems protagonist isn’t as slovenly as a Dangerfield character, but he might as well be going around saying how he gets no respect despite being such a hotshot. In Easy Money, Dangerfield plays a man offered a $10 million inheritance if he can give up such vices as drinking and gambling. Of course, he has to fake his way through it. That’s how he wins.


The Killing of a Chinese Bookie (1976)

The Safdie brothers love John Cassavetes films. “Cassavetes is a god and a hero,” Josh Safdie says in a list of favorites for Criterion, spotlighting their special releases of the filmmaker’s work available at the time. “Bookie, Opening Night, Faces, Shadows, and the later-added Love Streams are film school for a hundred bucks. We watch the master turn actors into people and vice versa, and hold the feeling above anything else.”

You get that feeling with the Safdies with Uncut Gems, as well, and there’s a little bit of most of those Cassevetes classics in the makeup of the Safdies’ movie, too. The Killing of a Chinese Bookie is obviously the closest to Uncut Gems in terms of the subject matter and the main character. Ben Gazzara stars in the crime film as a strip club owner who is constantly in debt to the mob because of a gambling habit. His potential way out of his situation, though, is different from Harold’s: he’s tasked with, you guessed it, killing a Chinese bookie. Can he make it through the night and settle everything without a hitch, unlike Howard at the end of his story? You’ll have to watch it and see.


2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and The Exorcist (1973)

Plenty of reviews and features about Uncut Gems have mentioned the opening of the Safdies’ movie as being reminiscent of the beginning of The Exorcist. Maybe even as an intentional homage. The newer movie kicks off with a prologue set in an Ethiopian mine as the rare, titular black opal is discovered. William Friedkin’s horror classic starts with an archaeological dig in Iraq that uncovers an ancient amulet. But the Safdies haven’t directly acknowledged the connection and even have named Friedkin’s Sorcerer as a link to Uncut Gems instead. Still, it’s undoubtedly part of their movie’s DNA.

Some critics also mention Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey when addressing the opening of Uncut Gems, specifically regarding the transition from the opal to Howard’s colon. The sci-fi movie actually has been directly recognized as an influence on the Safdies movie. When that psychedelic moment comes up, Josh Safdie tells Matt Zoller Seitz in an interview for the Uncut Gems press notes: “2001, arguably one of the greatest movies ever made, was weirdly very inspiring in making this movie—the concept of the universe existing in each of us. We are actually the aliens. We are all these vessels for human wonder. We are all these individual monoliths. We all have these crazy stories to tell.”

Fun fact, though: as a reference for the VFX for the gem sequence, the Safdies used the sperm voyage from Look Who’s Talking.


The Moment of Truth (1965)

“We did watch The Moment of Truth by Francesco Rosi because we love the actual lenses that were used,” Benny Safdie admits in the Metrograph interview. Josh Safdie also reveals in a Little White Lies interview that they watched the movie at Criterion’s screening room in preparation and it informed the Passover seder scene. It’s about a poor farmer’s son who becomes a famous bullfighter, and real famous bullfighter Miguel ‘Miguelin’ Romero is the star. The Safdies love when films mix fiction with nonfiction elements — featuring real people like Kevin Garnett and The Weeknd as “themselves” in Uncut Gems — and they’re also especially fans of this Italian film’s cinematography.

The film, which the Safdies have acknowledged as a favorite in the aforementioned Criterion list (paired with Close-Up), comes up in a conversation with Paul Thomas Anderson for the A24 podcast. “It’s an awesome movie,” Josh Safdie tells the Punch-Drunk Love filmmaker. “And we watched it together, and [Uncut Gems DP Darius Khondji] did research and he found out they used this 360 C-lens. This 360 millimeter C lens, and like he searched, and he searched, and he found it…And he showed up with this red box and it was like, when he brought it to us it was like finding an alien carcass. He’s like ‘I got it,’ and then we, every once in a while he would be like, ‘Should we try the 360?’ And 360 is a long lens…”


Bicycle Thieves (1948)

Speaking of films that mix fiction with nonfiction, Vittorio De Sica’s Italian neorealist masterpiece Bicycle Thieves is another one of the Safdies’ longtime favorites. And Josh Safdie mentions it in the Cinema Scope interview with addressing how much they like infusing some form of realism into their own movies. He goes on to speak of an element of Uncut Gems that relates to the football stadium crowd:

Uncut Gems was the nexus of our obsessions, starting with basketball, which is a sport that’s very manic and very up and down, but fusing it with the concept of realism, using the language of documentary to sidle up to the plot and not just support it, but almost affect it,” he says. “That’s why when the fair-use lawyers told us that we couldn’t change the outcome or chronology of the game, we loved those restrictions. We felt beholden [to] reality, which was helpful. We could write dialogue based on what actually happened in that game.”

Bicycle Thieves does specifically align well with Uncut Gems in an ancestral sense. While its tone is certainly not as intense, the feeling that Antonio must have while searching for his bicycle, which is his livelihood, is surely similar to Howard’s mindset throughout Uncut Gems. These are desperate men who need to recoup what they’ve specifically lost or else they’ve really lost everything. The difference is that, even if Antonio should have been more careful with his new and vitally essential possession, his fate is less his own doing than Howard’s gambling problems. We feel much more sorry for the man who is stolen from than the man who has bet his money away.


Additional Suggested Viewing (as cited by the Safdies):
Bad Lieutenant
Blue Chips
Crooklyn
Cruising
Dog Day Afternoon
The French Connection
Girlfriends
A Hole in the Head
The King of Comedy
King of the Gypsies
The King of New York

Life Lessons
Marathon Man
Midnight Cowboy
Mikey and Nicky
Paid in Full
Perfect
Saturday Night Fever
Sorcerer
Straight Time
A Stranger Among Us
Tootsie
The Treasure of the Sierra Madre 

‘The Savage Bees’ Will Give You a Buzz

Welcome to 4:3 & Forgotten — a weekly column in which Rob Hunter and I get to look back at TV terrors that scared adults (and the kids they let watch) across the limited airwaves of the ’70s.


In times of widespread panic, you can always rely on horror movies to take advantage of the hysteria. The 70s, in particular, was an anxious period in American history following events such as — but not limited to — the Manson Family murder trials, Vietnam, Watergate, and the rise of “Satanism.” However, there was also a scare craze that pertained to nature involving Africanized killer bees that allegedly gathered in large swarms to kill humans.

In the end, the reports proved to be exaggerated. While Africanized bees did make their way to America, they never endangered the population. These insects still exist to this day, and they’ve posed no more trouble to society than regular bees throughout the years. Still, back in the 70s, the media was buzzing about the alleged deadly swarms, and horror cinema responded accordingly. The Swarm (1978) is arguably the most popular film to emerge from the trend, but The Savage Bees also deserves your attention.

When: November 22, 1976
Where: NBC

Directed by Bruce Geller from a script by Guerdon Trueblood, The Savage Bees is a movie that embodies the sensationalism being perpetuated by the media at the time. A killer swarm of African bees has made its way to America from Brazil, and they descend upon a town where they kill dogs, chickens, and human beings. But they have New Orleans during Mardi Gras season in their sights, and it is up to a sheriff (Ben Johnson), an entomologist (Gretchen Corbett), and a coroner (Michael Parks) to save the day.

The Savage Bees German AdThe Savage Bees may have been informed by the bee paranoia of the zeitgeist, but a certain Steven Spielberg movie from 1975 about a shark undoubtedly inspired its creation as well. The plot shares a couple of similarities with Jaws — a popular holiday town under threat from a natural menace, scientists and law enforcement teaming up to put a stop to the enemy, etc — but that’s not a bad thing at all. If you’re going to mine any movie for influence, always go with one of the best of all time.

But The Savage Bees is more than a clone of Spielberg’s classic that replaces a shark with an insect swarm. There’s a lot to love in this movie, especially the scenes of bee-centric mayhem. The film contains several aerial and POV shots that, when coupled with the buzzy sound mixing, make for some highly suspenseful sequences. The film doesn’t waste any time getting into the heat of the danger either, as one of the early moments sees a little girl being hunted by the charged up insects. I’m usually all for endangered kids in movies, and the fact this one had me rooting for the child to escape says a lot about its ability to put the viewer in the characters’ footsteps.

Then there are the scenes featuring human beings and vehicles covered in bees, which are flat-out gross and heightened by performances that showcase authentic fear. Real bees were used and some of the actors were required to let the insects buzz around them and crawl all over their bodies. While the bees were controlled by experts to prevent the cast from being injured, most viewers will wince during these parts.

Another thing I love about this movie is the way in which it presents the threat as scientifically plausible. While the so-called science of killer bees proved to be nothing more than a hoax at the time, The Savage Bees is a movie that takes its threat seriously. This element of realism works in the film’s favor too, as bees do exist and their stings have killed plenty of people. I don’t recommend watching this one if you’re allergic to the bastards.

That said, the moments of terror are interspersed with some terrific character moments, some of which are loaded with dry humor and a sense of camaraderie between the heroes. The central characters are each given some personality and good lines to work with, and the performances are strong across the board. It never ceases to amaze me that Parks never became an A-list leading man after this and the countless other movies and TV shows he starred in that flew under the radar. This is yet another example of one of his many amazing turns.

The Savage Bees is simple horror done right, and its commitment to using real bees and presenting their invasion in such a sincere manner reaps big rewards. This is a movie that will give you the heebie jeebies and make you wonder why anyone could subject themselves to this kind of torment. But they went through this for our entertainment, and their efforts paid off with a neat little movie to show for it.

Turn the dial (okay fine just click here) for more 4:3 & Forgotten.

A Few Bad Men Display ‘Conduct Unbecoming’

Welcome to The Prime Sublime, a weekly column dedicated to the underseen and underloved films buried beneath page after page of far more popular fare on Amazon’s Prime Video collection. We’re not just cherry-picking obscure titles, though, as these are movies that we find beautiful in their own, often unique ways. You might even say we think they’re sublime…

“Sublime /səˈblÄ«m/: of such excellence, grandeur, or beauty as to inspire great admiration or awe”


Rob Reiner’s A Few Good Men (1992) is a stellar courtroom drama with a killer cast, and while its observations might seem quaint to today’s audiences more accustomed to mistrusting authority and authoritative forces, its power remains. It’s far from the only film to explore the inherent dishonor and idiosyncrasies of military culture in the face of violence — films like The General’s Daughter (1999) and the severely under-appreciated Casualties of War (1989) tackle similar ideas in far more barbaric specificity — but it’s often the best-remembered. 1975’s Conduct Unbecoming is a lesser-known example with an equally impressive cast, but it deserves attention for being far more thought-provoking.

What’s it about?

It’s the late 19th century, and for two young men new to the Queen’s Royal army it’s the start of a probationary period as officers alongside an established regiment in India. 2nd Lt. Arthur Drake (Michael York) is excited at the prospect and the location, while his good friend 2nd Lt. Edward Millington (James Faulkner) has other plans — the son of a well-respected general, he wants to be booted as soon as possible so he can find a far easier lifestyle elsewhere. They’re quickly taught the various rules, signs of respect, and traditions of the regiment, from their expected behavior towards superiors and women to the games the soldiers play. One of those games results in Maj. Alastair Wimbourne (Christopher Plummer) piercing a stuffed pig’s anus with his sword, but the less said about that the better.

A party held not long after their arrival is interrupted with the screams of Mrs. Marjorie Scarlett (Susannah York) — widow to a celebrated captain who was killed and defiled in battle three years prior — who stumbles in from the garden showing clear signs of an attack. The concerned officers gather around as she points the finger of blame towards Millington. The young man only smirks instead of denying the accusation, and in an effort to avoid ruining the regiment’s honor and reputation it’s decided that they’ll hold their own unofficial tribunal to determine the man’s fate. A begrudging Drake is chosen to defend his friend, but what everyone expects to be an open and shut case instead reveals something far darker and more ingrained within the regiment.

What makes it sublime?

There’s a lot to love here, and first up is the similarity to the aforementioned A Few Good Men. Like that film, Conduct Unbecoming is an adaptation of a play, and both stories send untested young men into “battle” attempting to defend someone they see as innocent against powers far greater than them both. Tradition, honor, and blind respect for superiors and established customs hamper Drake’s efforts as his superiors make it clear that proceeding with an actual defense will end his career, but he’s unable to do anything less. He’s acting on his own self-described “bourgeois principle” as he believes in true honor, not the blanket, surface-level honor prescribed by empty codes of conduct and military authority. York infuses his protagonist with a strong sense of what’s right and a growing urgency to defend it, and his journey from uncertainty to self-confidence is a compelling one.

Poster Conduct Unbecoming

He’s joined by a fantastic cast including the already mentioned Plummer as the highly suspicious major and a handful of equally familiar faces. Richard Attenborough and Trevor Howard both play superiors of varied involvement, while Stacy Keach is terrific as the captain running the trial. His ice-cold conviction about both Drake and the man he’s defending is clear, but like My Cousin Vinny‘s (1992) Judge Chamberlain Haller, he’s a man of integrity willing to be swayed by the truth. Keach isn’t as funny as Fred Gwynne, obviously, but it’s a memorable performance all the same.

Director Michael Anderson (Murder By Phone, 1982) brings Robert Enders’ script (and Barry England’s play) to life with simplicity using sound stages and some brief blue screen work for exteriors, but the film’s power is in its performances and a commentary that skirts modern convention in some risky ways. For one, Drake’s defense is built on the premise that Scarlett is lying meaning the film’s not quite in line with today’s “believe women” mandate. To be clear, the case involves assault, not rape, but she’s still painted lightly as being somewhat promiscuous and bawdy. Drake’s attitude even sees him propose excusing his friend of some culpability due to his being inebriated that night. It’s a learning curve, though, and Drake is finding his footing as the trial proceeds across a few nights.

The true target here, beyond merely the man responsible for the actual attack, is a culture that not only allows and cultivates such behavior but that helps cover it up as well. “Did he try to put his hand on your bosom?” asks Drake of Scarlett, and there are gasps from the officers at the young man’s nerve, but these are the same people who speak of the “savages” beyond their walls and play games involving the chase and anal piercing of that stuffed boar. Their show of offense is just that, and through the trial both Drake and even Scarlett call them out for it. Her parting words see her condemning not just her assailant but all men, and it’s as contemporary a sting as you could hope.

Other elements come into play here from PTSD fueled by the trauma of war and loss to the propriety of class made evident with a command from above stating that “Gentlemen do not question the honor of other gentlemen.” That parlays into men refusing to indict each other as well, even past the point of clear wrongdoing, and it’s a straight line to realities like “the thin blue line” that afflicts modern America — we’re told there are a few bad apples within police departments, but can the others be called good if they don’t speak up from within to protect those of us on the outside?

And in conclusion…

Conduct Unbecoming is a smart, well-paced, and strongly cast drama that pairs an engrossing mystery with an indictment of men who place their supposed honor and standing above both truth and the people “beneath” their circle. The mystery and outcome both engage even as the film’s true strength, that commentary on a culture emboldened by authority, rears its powerful head. This is the good stuff, the sadly relevant stuff, and it’s currently available on Amazon Prime.

Want more sublime Prime finds? Of course you do.

Friday 29 May 2020

Learn the Complete Story of Bruce Lee in Doc Film 'Be Water' Trailer

Be Water Doc Trailer

"Be formless. Shapeless." ESPN has unveiled an official trailer for the documentary Be Water, an extensive look at the life of Bruce Lee, which will air on ESPN first in early June then moves onto streaming. Made by Vietnamese-American filmmaker Bao Nguyen, the film initially premiered at the Sundance Film Festival earlier this year. Rejected by Hollywood, Bruce Lee returned to Hong Kong in 1971 to make four iconic films. Charting his struggles in two worlds, Nguyen's Be Water explores questions of identity and representation through rare archive, intimate interviews, and his writings. Described as "a 30 for 30 film that intimately chronicles Bruce Lee's life and complex journey." The focus on this is more than just one segment of his life, but rather all of his life, starting out with his youth growing up in America before going back to Hong Kong.

Here's the first official trailer (+ poster) for Bao Nguyen's documentary Be Water, direct from YouTube:

Be Water Poster

Description from Sundance: "In 1971, before his superstardom, Bruce Lee returned to Hong Kong to get the opportunities to be a lead actor that eluded him in America. In the two years before his untimely death, Lee completed four films, which changed the history of film and made him a household name. Through rare archival footage, memories of family and friends, and his own words, the story of that time and Lee’s prior experiences are told with an intimacy and immediacy that have infrequently been used in earlier tellings of his legend." Be Water is directed by Vietnamese-American filmmaker Bao Nguyen, director of the doc Live from New York! previously, as well as a few shorts and TV work; he's also a cinematographer and producer. This first premiered at the Sundance Film Festival earlier this year. ESPN will release Nguyen's Be Water streaming starting on June 7th this summer. For more info, visit their website. Who wants to watch this?

Trailer for 'Queen of Lapa' Doc About Brazilian Transgender Goddess

Queen of Lapa Trailer

"When you're alone, you learn how to live." Brokenhorse Films has unveiled an official trailer for an indie documentary titled Queen of Lapa, which originally screened at a few small film festivals last year. It will be released on VOD in June this summer for those curious to give it a look. A proud transgender sex worker since the age of eleven, Luana Muniz, now 59 years old, has helped shape a new reality in her "hostel" by housing a new generation of transgender sex workers in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Queen of Lapa explores the day-to-day lives, rivalries, and quests for love of many sex workers, as Muniz's guides them in a city full of hostility towards its LGBTQ community. This is not just a profile of a transgender goddess and "proud sex professional", but an intimate story about activism and how we can change the world by helping each other.

Here's the official trailer (+ poster) for Collatos & Monnerat's doc Queen of Lapa, direct from YouTube:

Queen of Lapa Poster

Larger-than-life actress, cabaret performer, activist, and proud sex professional since the age of eleven, Luana Muniz - arguably one of Brazil's most famous transgender personalities - has shaped a new reality in her hostel by providing a safe working environment for generations of young transgendered girls in neighborhood of Lapa in Rio de Janeiro. Queen of Lapa explores the women's day-to-day lives, quests for love, the Brazilian political climate, housemate rivalries, all happening under matriarch Muniz's watchful and guiding eye. Queen of Lapa is co-directed by Brazilian filmmakers Theodore Collatos (director of the docs Move and On Point, and other features / shorts) & Carolina Monnerat (a doc producer making her directorial debut). This originally premiered at the Maryland Film Festival last year. Brokenhorse Films will release Queen of Lapa direct-to-VOD starting June 19th this summer. For more, visit the official website.

Hurry & View Shane Carruth's Pitch Trailer for Sci-Fi Project 'A Topiary'

A Topiary Trailer

Surprise! This isn't an official trailer, but it is certainly worth watching. And you better hurry…! Filmmaker Shane Carruth posted a trailer online for his long, lost project called A Topiary, an original sci-fi film he was working on for years. But he doesn't know if it will be removed by Vimeo. "This will probably get taken down because I lifted a bunch of shots from films." We first heard about the film around 2013, when Carruth was finishing his other film Upstream Color. It's an intriguing concept involving a group of young pre-teen boys who discover some machine that creates funnels which form various shapes and objects. This trailer does a much better job of visualizing it. This is a "mock-up" or "pitch" trailer, where a filmmaker uses clips & footage from other films to create a "what my film would look like" version of a trailer to sell to studios / financiers. However, it's clear there is some VFX footage made just for this - as seen at the end. Take a look.

Here's the original pitch trailer for Shane Carruth's film A Topiary, from the Upstream Color Twitter:

A Topiary Film

An early original description of the script: It’s a tale told in two parts: The opening section follows a city worker who becomes obsessed with a recurring starburst pattern he sees hidden everywhere around him, even in traffic grids. He eventually joins with other believers, forming a kaffeeklatsch-cult that's soon undone by greed and hubris. The second half follows a group of 10 preteen boys who discover a strange machine that produces small funnels, which in turn can be used to build increasingly agile robotlike creatures. As their creations grow in power and size, the kids' friendships begin to splinter and they’re forced to confront another group of creature-builders. A Topiary was a sci-fi film project in development by filmmaker Shane Carruth, director of the films Primer and Upstream Color previously. He has been producing projects and doing other work ever since Upstream Color in 2013. It sounds like A Topiary will never be made, but at least we got this look at it anyway. So what do you think? Would you watch this film?

What Critics Said About ‘The Office’

They Said What?! is a biweekly column in which we explore the highs and lows of film criticism through history. How did critics feel about it at the time, and do we see it differently now? Chris Coffel explores.


This week marks the premiere of Space Force, a comedy series inspired by the recent creation of a sixth branch of the US military, also called Space Force, which is focused on off-world missions. And it’s a show that reunites the talents of producer Greg Daniels and actor Steve Carell.

Daniels and Carell of course worked together for several years on the hit NBC sitcom The Office. Daniels adapted the show from the UK series of the same name and it debuted on March 23, 2005. The American version would run for nine seasons, becoming a cultural phenomenon and making household names out of Carell, John Krasinski, Jenna Fischer, Craig Robinson, and Rainn Wilson.

Despite concluding seven years ago, The Office has maintained its massive popularity. The show rules the internet as an endless source for memes. Any comment that can even vaguely be interpreted as sexual is met with an enthusiastic exclamation of “That’s what she said!” For a while, it was the most-watched show on Netflix. And when the streaming giant announced The Office would be leaving their service at the end of 2020, they were bombarded by hordes of devastated fans, many of whom voiced their displeasure using gifs and quotes from the beloved show.

The Office consistently pops up on lists placing it among the greatest television shows of all time. Rolling Stone had the series at number 46 in its top 100 list, calling it “a groundbreaking and original comedy.” In The Guardian’s list of the 100 best TV shows of the 21st century, The Office came in at number 32. The show even made it to the final four of the One Perfect Binge here at FSR.

With the Daniels and Carell team officially back in action, we’ve decided now is a pretty fitting time to take a look back at the original critical response to the American version of The Office. For the purposes of this column, we’re going to limit ourselves to reviews regarding the show’s first season, most of which focus on the pilot.

Dana Stevens of Slate struggled to separate the remake from its UK origins, comparing the show to “waking up to find your beloved has been abducted, Invasion of the Body Snatchers-style, and replaced by a random stranger.” Stevens praised Carell, who at the time was still being referred to as “a former correspondent on The Daily Show,” but found very little joy with the rest of the cast, which she described as a “gross miscalculation.” Stevens was particularly harsh towards Wilson, saying his Dwight “lacks a comic hook of his own.”

Like Stevens, Tom Shales believed the American version suffered from the quality and success of the original series. In his review for The Washington Post, Shales wrote that the show “fails to score a direct hit, settling instead for an amusing approximation.” With regards to casting, Shales took the exact opposite stance of Stevens, calling Carell “the central problem” and saying he “is simply not as good as was Ricky Gervais as the boss in the British prototype.” Of the supporting cast, Shales wrote that they are “nearly as good as their British equivalents.”

Belinda Acosta was impressed by Wilson’s performance but the praise in her Austin Chronicle review stopped there. Acosta felt carrying over the “original’s understated performance style” was a bad move that could ultimately harm its lasting power stateside. Wondering whether or not the show would be successful, Acosta wrote, “I’m not betting money on it.”

Writing for the Daily Mirror, Jane Simon was relieved that the American take wasn’t bad. Simon still wasn’t necessarily impressed, and like Stevens, she too compared it to a bodysnatchers moment. Ultimately Simon concluded, “There’s only one David Brent — and this isn’t him.

In his review for the San Francisco Chronicle, Tim Goodman wrote that the American take “is not only funny, it creatively pays homage to the original” and is “unique and audaciously clever in its own right.” Goodman praised Carell for a “wonderful performance,” crediting him with creating “a different kind of obnoxious oaf than Gervais’ David Brent.” Quality aside, Goodman did wonder whether or not the show would catch on with American audiences.

James Poniewozik placed The Office on his list of best TV shows of 2005 in a piece for Time. “Producer Greg Daniels created not a copy,” Poniewozik wrote, “but an interpretation that sends up distinctly American work conventions (the staff party at Chili’s, the mandated diversity seminar), with a tone that’s more satiric and less mordant.”

Matthew Gilbert praised NBC “for staying true to the downbeat spirit” of the original series in his review for the Boston Globe. Gilbert favorably compared The Office to Arrested Development and Scrubs, calling it “ambitious” and describing it as just the sort of facelift American television needs. Of the new cast of characters, Gilbert found the majority to be “promising” with Carell serving as the lone exception. “He’s just not layered enough to make us love to hate him on a weekly basis,” Gilbert wrote of the show’s star.

Knowing what we know now, it’s a bit odd to look back and see so many middling reviews regarding Carell and the show, but it’s hardly a surprise. The odds were heavily stacked against The Office, and by all accounts, it should have failed in America. It’s a dry, awkward show that lacks the one-liners and laugh-tracks Americans so desperately love. Whether or not Daniels and Carell can have repeat success with their latest series remains to be seen, but I can’t wait to tune in and find out.

Vocal Performances Deserve More Recognition

Some of the most iconic movie characters of all time are hidden behind a mask or prop or exist solely in animated form. Think of Darth Vader, Bugs Bunny, and HAL-9000. These three characters and countless others have affected us primarily with the sound of their voice — provided by James Earl Jones, Mel Blanc, and Douglas Rain, respectively. But such powerful achievements tend to be overlooked by the Oscars and especially the Golden Globes. In fact, vocal performances, whether linked to physical or animated characters, are entirely ineligible for any sort of recognition by the latter’s Hollywood Foreign Press Association.

The matter has come up in the past, such as when the HFPA ruled against allowing Scarlett Johansson to be considered for a Golden Globe for her voice acting in Her. In that movie, she’s an unseen AI personality, similar to Rain’s work as HAL-9000 in 2001: A Space Odyssey. Now the same organization has decided to clarify that any role by an unseen actor is considered a voice-only performance, meaning that an actor obscured by a mask or costume (but presumably not makeup) does not qualify, even if the actor in physically in the scene. The announcement was to clarify whether or not Pedro Pascal was eligible for his performance as the titular character in The Mandalorian.

Technically, Pascal’s performance goes beyond vocal, since he is the person in the costume (albeit aided by two others who double for him with specific stunt tasks and weapon-handling expertise). That case is not the same as Jones and Vader, who was mostly physically portrayed under the costume by David Prowse in the original Star Wars trilogy. Or the interesting case of Yoda, who was voiced and also physically performed, through puppetry, by Frank Oz. Many other regular cast members of the franchise did, however, wear the costume as well as provide the character’s voice. Interestingly enough, the only person to ever receive an Oscar for vocal work — excluding Jones’ lifetime achievement honor that would in part be for his Vader role — was Ben Burtt, who was given a special Academy Award for his work on the first movie’s creature and robot sounds and voices, some of which, like R2-D2‘s iconic beeps and boops, were partly vocalized by himself.

The Oscars actually don’t discriminate against vocal performances by any rule of theirs, but outside of Burtt’s non-competitive exception, the Academy has never nominated an example of voice acting. There have been plenty of times when a performance in an animated feature has been suggested for inclusion among the acting nominees, namely Robin Williams as the Genie in Aladdin and Ellen DeGeneres as Dory in Finding Nemo. Performance-capture work, particularly by Andy Serkis and especially in the Lord of the Rings and Planet of the Apes movies have been pushed as well. The Academy does have one rule related to vocal performances and that’s to disqualify any acting done physically on the screen where the vocals are provided entirely by another actor. I guess that means Jones could have been nominated for Vader but not Prowse.

Should the Oscars just create a category for vocal performances? The Academy probably doesn’t hear about enough demand per year to do that, despite there certainly being enough contenders. But if so they could take the lead from the Emmys, which began separately recognizing voice acting in 1992, thanks to The Simpsons. The award tends to be in recognition of performances in animated programs (the initial incarnation of the category, before a split was made, also honored narration), though last year Sesame Street puppeteer Eric Jacobson was nominated for his work voicing various Muppet characters. Presumably, if Pascal was to receive an Emmy nomination for The Mandalorian, it’d have to be as Best Lead Actor.

Elsewhere, awards given for voice acting are exclusively for animation, as in the case of the Annies, which gives separate awards for movies and television performances. Or animation seems to be the focus, as in the Behind the Voice Acting Awards, though they have also nominated actors from Star Wars films and a few other live-action features with computer-animated or voice-only characters, including James Spader for Avengers: Age of Ultron and Scarlett Johansson for Her. Occasionally, as in the case of Mel Blanc by the Annies in 1977, legends in the voice acting field are recognized for a body of work and lifetime achievement. Cartoon staple Frank Welker deservedly received a lifetime achievement award at the Primetime Emmys in 2016.

Cases for vocal performances deserving more respect can be found all over the place in all kinds of movies and TV shows, but I’ve been watching the Toy Story films a lot lately and the original is a great example of the power of great voice acting. The visuals in the first Toy Story are quite crude, even by the standards of animation in general at the time, as that was very early in the craft of computer-generated animation. There was definitely a novelty to the look of the movie that garnered a lot of attention. The reason it still works today, however, is due in large part to the vocal performances. The writing is definitely another major reason, as is the directing of those relatively rudimentary drawings, but particularly Tom Hanks and Tim Allen bring not only their characters but the whole movie to life.

Pascal’s performance in The Mandalorian is not as outstanding or memorable as others mentioned here, but similarly, his voice goes a long way in the characterization of a role that offers little physical expression — all body language and no facial movement until the one episode where he finally removes his helmet. He does it more subtly than most voice actors, too. It’s a unique kind of performance, though, due to Pascal being present in the suit. More like Anthony Daniels as C-3PO in Star Wars than, say The Mandalorian‘s own droid IG-11, who is voiced but not physically portrayed by Taika Waititi. In a way, it’s a hybrid performance, but not really any different than performance capture. Classification for which sort of categories in which sort of awards gets tricky in such circumstances.

Broadly speaking, physical or vocal, they’re all just performances by actors. So, preferably, anything from silent roles to voice-only roles should be judged together based on how well the actor embodies and personalizes and communicates the character in whatever way is needed. That does get complicated when considering roles with multiple performers — like how the title character of The Mandalorian is technically played by the two doubles as well as by Pascal — but film and television acting has always been a collaborative effort with performances aided by directing and editing. Perhaps just as characters and IP have replaced actors as the “movie stars,” the characters are the ones who’ll one day be recognized overall rather than any specific persons performing those roles.

Celebrating the Best of the Chattanooga Film Festival 2020

It’s not news to anyone that we’re living in a whole new world these days (and for the immediate future, at least), and it’s forced both people and businesses to adapt at a fairly quick pace. With tightly packed gatherings not currently allowed, film festivals have had to re-think the way they go about presenting and celebrating movies that would otherwise be premiering to crowds of in-person movie-lovers. While some understandably canceled or postponed their events, others have moved forward with plans to host their festival virtually — and the Chattanooga Film Festival 2020 was the first out of the digital gate.

The fest’s inaugural (and hopefully final as this pandemic moves towards its conclusion) installment experienced a handful of minor bumps — casting to TVs was disabled without the inconvenience of a physical cable, at least one film had a watermark, some people experienced connection issues — but the three day experience still managed to be a success as it brought a varied selection of films and filmmakers into “contact” with eager moviegoers.

Our own Brad Gullickson and I both attended the virtual fest, and now that its digital curtains have closed (and fest winners have been announced) we wanted to highlight some of the films that we enjoyed the most. Keep reading for the best of the Chattanooga Film Festival 2020!


Attack of the Demons

Attack Of The Demons

Attack of the Demons (2019) is a South Park as fuck rallying cry for all the dweeby horror nerds who rejected the normal friendship ceremonies of high school in favor of a demonic pact with the drippiest and goopiest VHS box art of the 1980s. You thought you were alone in your love of all things Stuart Gordon and Sam Raimi, but director Eric Power and writer Andreas Petersen offer kinship and understanding. Set in a small town besieged by wretch-spewing zombies of the human and fox variety as well as your basic cultists, Attack of the Demons is silly, dumb, gross, and utterly loving. Mom and Dad won’t get it, but anyone who argued the merits of Deathstalker II over Deathstalker I most certainly will. (Brad Gullickson)


Fulci for Fake

Fulci For Fake

There is little in common between Fulci For Fake (2019) and the infamous Orson Welles pseudo-documentary from which the first film steals its name, but through such titular theft, filmmaker Simone Scafidi lays tremendous import atop the work of the Italian master of gore. Scafidi is having some serious fun with his device, hiring Nicola Nocella to play a man preparing to take on the mantle of Lucio Fulci, who dares to understand his subject via one-on-one interviews with Fulci’s daughters, collaborators, and friends. However, the nudge-nudge-wink-wink gimmick quickly disappears, leaving a fairly basic discussion on Fulci, and it will most certainly not engage mainstream audiences. That’s fine. Fulci For Fake is made for the die-hards; the folks who ache to know more about the man who produced The Beyond and City of the Living Dead. Fulci had a massive career before he ever directed the films that would send him into legend, and his life was equally as large and dramatic and filled with just as much shock and horror. You cannot go into Fulci For Fake blind, the film requires plenty of preconceived infatuation, but if you come packing, you’ll be rewarded. (Brad Gullickson)


Hellriders

Hellriders

The bliss of the Chattanooga Film Festival is that they are not only a haven for contemporary genre gems but also one for the misunderstood and forgotten treasures of yesterday. Their partnership with Vinegar Syndrome put a spotlight on a couple of older flicks this year, but Hell Riders (1984) was by far my favorite. The film technically stars TV Land legends Adam West (Batman) and Tina Louise (Gilligan’s Island), but since they only worked a single day on set, nearly all of their work was captured in close-up, leaving the rest of their performances to be shot via body double. The result is a laughably entertaining jigsaw production about a crazed biker gang laying siege to Anywhere, USA. Hell Riders is a mess of a movie, but its raucous energy and absurd by-any-means-necessary approach to landing “bankable” talent for its marquee secures its place as you-gotta-see-it genre fare. (Brad Gullickson)


Jumbo

Jumbo

A film’s synopsis, even a one-sentence one, can’t help but set expectations, and a French feature about a young woman who strikes up an “intimate bond” with a Tilt-a-Whirl ride immediately gets your mind racing. Jumbo (2020) is that film, and writer/director Zoé Wittock delivers far more than even the odd premise suggests. Noémie Merlant (Portrait of a Lady on Fire) brings warmth and wonder to the young woman who falls inexplicably in love with the carnival ride she nicknames Jumbo, and while touches of everything from Adventureland to The Shape of Water to a sexy Close Encounters of the Third Kind abound the film finds its own voice. The specifics may seem absurd, but the theme is ridiculously human — we can be more accepting towards those around us even when we don’t quite understand them. Especially if we don’t understand them. Jumbo won the fest’s audience award this year, and it’s easy to see why. (Rob Hunter)


Remembering the Game

Surviving The Game

One of this year’s highlights was the forty-five-minute Surviving the Game (1994) celebration between CFF Artistic Director Josh Goldbloom and star Ice-T. Ernest Dickerson was meant to attend as well, but whether through technical difficulties or forgetfulness, the director did not make the Q&A. That’s okay. Goldbloom and Ice-T did just fine on their own. Goldbloom grabbed gold from Ice-T, siphoning stories of Gary Busey’s terrifying-yet-perfect dinner table improvisation as well as how Ice-T’s “popped ass muscle” accentuated his wounded dog performance. We tend to dismiss Surviving the Game as the lesser homage to The Most Dangerous Game, with John Woo’s Hard Target stealing the majority conversation, but this chat made me reconsider and forced a re-watch on Saturday night. Dammit, Surviving the Game is legit. You can never watch the film the same way again, knowing that during a good portion of production, Ice-T was wearing compression pants. (Brad Gullickson)


Scare Package

Scare Package

Anthology horror films and horror/comedies are some of the toughest sub-genres to get right, so right off the bat the makers of Scare Package (2019) deserve some kudos. Seeing them mostly pull it off is even more impressive, and while there are still a couple duds the majority of the film delivers big laughs and lots of fun for horror fans. It’s purely a comedy using horror knowledge as the basis for the bulk of its humor, but the lack of actual scares doesn’t hurt the film. And besides, the practical gore effects are plentiful, gooey, and frequent. The biggest highlights come courtesy of Emily Hagins, Aaron B. Koontz, and Chris McInroy, and I recommend you give the film a spin when it opens wider this summer. (Rob Hunter)


Skull: The Mask

Skull The Mask

You don’t see a lot of Brazilian horror films, but hopefully this energetically gory romp will help jump start more. Skull: The Mask (2020) opens with Nazis fucking around with the occult, and after going sideways in bloody fashion we jump forward tot he present as the magically imbued mask of the title finds its way into more wrong hands. Writers/directors Armando Fonseca and Kapel Furman maybe bite off a little more than they can chew plot-wise, but they nail the core of the tale involving a muscle-bound fool who dons the mask and becomes an unstoppable brute tearing victims limb from limb, crushing heads, and more. The filmmakers have a clear appreciation for professional wrestling too as their killer pile drives at least one sucker into oblivion. This is an ultra low-budget feature, but it’s no less of a blast for it. (Rob Hunter)


The Wanting Mare

The Wanting Mare

The log line lists this as a film about a family of women who pass the same dream down across generations, but The Wanting Mare (2020) is about far more than that bit of curiousness. The film creates a world many years removed from our own on a tiny budget, and it’s impossible not to admire the ambition and artistry on display in its tale of people trying to earn passage to a fabled better place. Gangsters, civilians, strange dreams, mysterious babies, and those inexplicable horses — seriously, I still don’t understand their importance here — make for a compelling and ethereal tale. This is Nicholas Ashe Bateman’s baby, but with producer Shane Carruth (Upstream Color) along for the ride you know in advance it’s going to be far from clear cut in the story department. Still, whether you see it as a metaphor for creating a life where you are rather than merely dreaming of a better one elsewhere or more cynically take it as being about how motherhood sometimes holds women in place and stifles their own dreams, it’s a captivating experience. And let’s be real, it’s probably about neither of those things meaning you’ll probably find your own meaning within its dreamy world. (Rob Hunter)

‘Labyrinth 2’ Positions Scott Derrickson as the Latest Champion of an Art Form in Need

Welcome to Infinite IP, our ongoing series detailing the pros and cons of resurrecting a franchise years after its original endpoint. Some call them Reboots. Others call them Legasequels. Hollywood calls them an infinitely recyclable resource.


There’s a reason why The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance caused such a stir when it premiered last year. No, it was not the product of simple nostalgia. Observe your surroundings. Simply nothing else looks or feels like that show.

The combination of Brian Froud’s designs and the puppet wizardry of The Jim Henson Company elevated the series above typical sci-fi and fantasy fare. What made The Dark Crystal unique in 1982 still makes it unique in 2020. To attempt a continuation in the medium of traditional animation or CGI would rob the franchise of its power.

With such a successful legacy sequel under their belt, why not go for another? Talk of Labyrinth 2 has circulated for quite some time — basically since the original stormed our dreams and nightmares in 1986 — but, for a variety of reasons, the follow-up never materialized. Fans had to settle for tangential comic books, novels, and video games instead. These close-but-no-cigar offerings tantalized, but never satiated our hunger.

More than thirty years after the original hit theaters, the sequel will finally land before our eyes, and it’s being overseen by an unlikely yet perfect director. According to Deadline, Scott Derrickson nabbed the gig. The demented innovator of nightmares who scored numerous frights on the cheap in Sinister and embraced and miraculously replicated Steve Ditko’s psychedelic panels in Doctor Strange will no doubt lean hard into his Jim Henson fandom to pull off an impossible reinvention.

Derrickson was not originally meant to helm Labyrinth 2. He was kneedeep in pre-production on Doctor Strange: In the Multiverse of Madness when, suddenly, he and Marvel Studios parted ways over those pesky “creative differences.” Add it to the long list of woeful Hollywood fallings-out that we will never fully understand, but rather than focus on what-could-have-been, let’s celebrate the opportunity this disintegration created.

On the one hand, Labyrinth is a whimsical musical fantasy draped in gorgeous production design as a means to meet its mystical array of puppet characters. On the other hand, it’s a very real assault on our most childish and selfish desires. Jennifer Connelly plays Sarah Williams, a teenager condemned to babysit her baby brother Toby. When the brat dares to claim her precious teddy bear as his own, she wishes him away, and David Bowie‘s very real Goblin King stakes his claim on the chubby infant.

Sarah chases the Goblin King into the labyrinth, where she has thirteen hours to solve the maze and retrieve her sibling. As wondrous as the film is, it is equally horrendous and fraught with beasts, trolls, and creatures who pluck their eyes from their heads. We all look fondly upon our memory of the film, but we don’t forget the nightmares it spawned as well.

A sequel could go in numerous directions. The film could pick up the tale decades later with an adult Sarah struggling as a parent of bratty children. There would be a pleasant cameo by Connelly before her kids take over the narrative, plunging into the prison of walls she nearly lost her brother to so many years prior. Or, the sequel could simply find a new family to terrorize.

In the original theatrical trailer for Labyrinth, the film was marketed as an unprecedented collaboration between three geniuses: Jim Henson, George Lucas, and David Bowie. While the Henson brand is maintained through his producer children, Lisa Henson and Brian Henson, all three original creators are absent from the sequel (two of them being deceased, the other retired). How do you preserve their vision now that they’re gone or uninvolved?

As Derrickson proved on Doctor Strange, through careful study, respect of the material, and adhering to the original process of creation. The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance did not deny itself the techniques of today, using CGI and greenscreen to mask the existence of puppeteers. No, the series looked as it should, as a modern telling born from Jim Henson’s raw materials.

Puppetry is not a dusty craft. With the passing of so many years, tremendous advancements have been made thanks to folks like The Jim Henson Company. It may seem like we have given up on the art form, but they have been moving forever forward, tinkering, and improving on what the senior Henson gifted to us in the past. Attempt a side-by-side comparison of both Dark Crystals, and you will discover a helluva facelift.

Labyrinth 2 must do the same, and in doing so, keep the medium in front of our eyes. That’s as essential as anything else. Puppetry is a valid artistic offering, but we’ve turned our backs on it of late. Embrace what The Jim Henson Company is doing and encourage other artists to follow in their footsteps. Why settle for the Pixar house-style?

The sequel’s greatest challenge will be invoking the spirit of Bowie without his physical presence. How about a jukebox musical? Bowie may not be there, but his songs and his voice can still exist. The sound of the Goblin King should echo through the long corridors and dark dungeons of the maze.

Legacy is obviously important within legacy sequels, but the sequel side of things is even more so. There has to be a point beyond nostalgia for a Part 2 to work. Why are we here? What more is there to say? The story necessitates continuation and not the other way around. It’s on Derrickson and his crew to prove the story’s worth.

Little stabs at happiness 1: Closing credits as they should be done

DB here:

With apologies to Ken Jacobs, I’m starting an irregular series of posts that offer lockdown viewing that’s merely good dirty fun. They’re the sort of thing I like to look at to lift my spirits.

I’ll start the series with the charming credits scene from Farah Khan’s Main Hoon Na (I Am Here, 2004). (No subtitles, but probably not so much needed.) I love its shamelessly homemade look, as well as its tribute to everybody–yeah, apparently everybody–working behind the scenes on a movie. In cinema, madly cheerful conviction can take you very far.

The whole film is no less enjoyable, and it’s available on many streaming platforms. And check out our new category of Covid-19 cinema for other suggestions.

When is a Long Take Just a Gimmick?

Welcome to The Queue — your daily distraction of curated video content sourced from across the web.


There is a twelve-minute continuous shot in the Chris Hemsworth vehicle ExtractionAt least, it appears to be continuous. As VFX technology has made stitching shots together a lot easier, long takes (or rather, “long takes”) have become increasingly popular. While there are entire films that use this technique, like Birdman and 1917, films with one big showstopping “oner” are far more common. Think the HALO  jump in Mission: Impossible – Fallout, or the opening raid in The Revenant.

Which brings us back to the twelve-minute long take in Extraction. It’s a oner that exemplifies both the potential and the pitfalls of the VFX-stitched long take. A new video essay uses the long take in Extraction as an opportunity to interrogate why filmmakers would lock themselves into a technically challenging, static oner. By comparing the oner in Extraction to its peers, the video essay unpacks the precarity of the VFX-stitched long take. How, without the stakes of a true oner and the technology to truly render cuts invisible, filmmakers need to ensure that their long takes put story first so that an audacious oner is never just an audacious oner.

You can watch “Is the Crazy Long Take in ‘Extraction’ a Gimmick?” here:


Who made this?

This video essay was created by Virginia-based filmmaker and video editor Thomas Flight, who runs a YouTube channel under the same name. You can follow Flight and check out his back catalog of video essays on YouTube here. You can follow him on Twitter here.

More Videos Like This

Michael Mann: Master of Cool Colors

Michael Mann is the kind of director who holds complete films in his head before he begins making them. He is a rare breed of an auteur who has everything to do with everything. In the scope of his filmography, his producing and screenwriting are no less significant than his directing. He ceaselessly communicates the blueprint he envisions for each department — hyper-specific costuming, makeup, background direction, prop placement, blocking, lighting, shooting, production design, et al.

But above everything, Mann, like a painter, is most fascinated by color.

His calculated use of color across his career has rendered him an icon in the field. While some filmmakers use color solely to achieve style, Mann uses it for substance as much as style. Do not let anyone fool you into thinking his color schemes are empty just because he makes “dadcore” art cinema. Mann manipulates color to elicit psychological and emotional reactions, establish tone, convey aspects of character, develop arcs in the narrative, express theme, and magnetize viewers to particular details, among other things.

He has been especially influential in the way he employs cool colors, like shades of blue, green, and purple. It makes sense that he is drawn to conventionally masculine color palettes laden with blues and greens. He writes about crime, cruelty, violence, love, death, sex, loneliness, loss, identity, and existentialism through the lens of traditionally masculine men situated within tense, moody, and often urban stories. Mann is so heavily associated with vibrant blue-green hues that even the cover art on the many scholarly texts written on him follow suit, as do most of the posters for his films.

To illustrate how Mann employs cool colors to tremendous effect, I’ve gone through his filmography, chosen twelve shots across ten features, and analyzed them using color theory, which I will explain in more detail as I unpack each shot. The Jericho Mile, The Keep, and LA Takedown were left out for lack of high definition copies. Without further ado, I invite you to plunge into the cool, electric color of Michael Mann.


Thief (1981)

Michael Mann Color Theory Thief

Of all of Michael Mann’s neon nocturnal odysseys, Thief might hold the title for best cinematography, courtesy of Donald E. Thorin. If nothing else, it’s tied with Miami Vice for the Most Vivid Colors Award. As a result, Thief wears many hats. For one, it’s Mann’s first theatrically released film. For another, it’s the first shot on this list.

This simple street shot is as adept at summing up Mann as an image could be. It comes in the first seven minutes and kicks off a dialogue-free plunge into the night layered with loud, ethereal synth pads (one can hear where the Safdie brothers found inspiration). The car taking up a third of the screen is the soon-to-be getaway car for Frank (James Caan) and Barry (Jim Belushi). The depth of the image compounded with the reflectiveness of the water and the blotches of light make it seem like we are about to calmly escape with them into a technicolor tunnel.

The image is lavish in its long, wide lenses, like a gold bar made of neon. That’s due to Mann’s methods. He reportedly ordered truckloads of water to hose down the streets of Chicago in an effort to “recreate the perspective of a Pissarro.” It was a stroke of impressionist genius. The blotted blue-green lighting looks like electricity surrounded in ink, sharp hues highly saturated and contrasted with the darkness.

In color theory, associative color schemes are those in which specific colors are used throughout the film to convey certain moods or themes. Green often represents an ominous mood, corruption/crime, danger, or darkness, all of which are either felt or foreshadowed in the luminous icy shades that dominate the image. Later, we learn that the villain of Thief owns two businesses with neon green signs, one of which is called the Green Mill Cocktail Lounge. The blues are deeper and more subtle. Peppered in, they contribute to the darkness and work with the dappled greens to establish the overarching coldness of the film.

This is also an example of what’s known as an analogous color scheme, which is defined by the prominent use of three colors that are next to each other on the color wheel, in this case the focal green and the blue and yellow that flank it. However, it’s not purely analogous. The single red pinprick in the background is louder than its size. One wonders if Mann really wanted it there, given that he outwardly detests the color, especially when it interrupts the cools.


Manhunter (1986)

Michael Mann Color Theory Manhunter

Manhunter is one of two films on this list with two shots. Of course, one could compile a long list of cool-colored shots for each individual film, but in the case of Manhunter, the two shots chosen illustrate Mann’s ability to use similar monochromatic color schemes to express different moods that are equally pervasive across the film. Monochromatic schemes are those made up of shades of a single color.

The first of these comes just before Will (William Petersen) asks his wife Molly (Kim Greist) whether she thinks he should return to Atlanta to help track down the killer. Here, blue represents melancholy and forewarns viewers of the couple’s imminent isolation from one another (as does their body language) once he takes the case.

This shot also checks off a directorial trademark for Mann, who is known for portraying characters next to — often looking out of — floor-to-ceiling windows that overlook an expansive ocean. The deep nautical hues blend almost flawlessly with the low-value moonlight lathering the characters inside, and together they create a sensual mood, much like the blue, erotic monochromatic fantasies of Alice in Eyes Wide Shut, except this sensuality is less shadowy and more faithful.

Michael Mann Color Theory Manhunter

In the second shot from Manhunter, we see a man examining the edge of a piece of paper through a much brighter blue light cast by an offscreen laser. Here, the frosty blue represents a cold, cerebral tone — an examiner sharp in his craft, detectives performing mental gymnastics, and a meticulous villain sneakily communicating with his genius serial killer role model, Hannibal Lecter, through the note in the lens. Cinematographer Dante Spinotti knows how to pull off the perfect monochrome color scheme.


The Last of the Mohicans (1992)

Michael Mann Color Theory Mohicans

Every Mann movie is adorned with its fair share of sweeping landscape shots, but The Last of the Mohicans is unique. Spinotti returns to plunge viewers into the vast, untouched landscapes of upstate New York in 1757 during the French and Indian War. In doing so, the period piece offers a rare look away from the radiant modernism of most of Mann’s work.

The shot in question is the opening. It initiates the forty-second period of slow panning across the forested mountains at dawn. The colors are beautiful and a bit curious, as if they loom over the image. Overall, it has a strong cyan tint that leans toward green over blue, which makes it an associative color scheme given the heavy presence of nature that it both depicts and represents. The center billows white fog while the mountains on its left and right form a grey-to-black gradient. Mann once said, “Adding white always makes color burn a little.” He picked the idea up from a 20th-century British painter and employs it here brilliantly. The dark cyan is ablaze with enchantment due to the white in the middle. It represents a danger to come.

The faintest complementary hues of orange-yellow light from the East horizon make it burn that much more and add layers of exoticism to the forest and the time period. It’s difficult to label this shot. One could argue that the faintness of sunlight is baked into the cool colors, making it a monochromatic dark cyan color scheme. Or one could argue that the hues from sunrise are distinct enough to call it a complementary color scheme, which is when an image is defined by two colors that sit across from each other on the color wheel (blue-green and orange-yellow here). And perhaps that’s what the color scheme best represents: complexity.

In making The Last of the Mohicans, Mann said he wanted to “take our understanding of those cultures […] and use our contemporary perspective as a tool to construct a more intense experience of realistically complex people in a complex time.” No matter what one calls the color scheme, the image does a terrific job of setting up the romantic, devastating tone of the tale to come while introducing viewers to the setting at large.


Heat (1995)

Michael Mann Color Theory Heat

This is by far the least aesthetically pleasing shot on the list, but it still comes from the almighty Mann-Spinotti duo. I chose it to exemplify Mann’s scrupulous, associative use of cool colors in duller shots that do not get as much attention. The entirety of Heat is a Mann masterclass on the topic of detail. For example, he demanded “specially designed wire-brushed hangers” be used in the film because he liked the way they looked and sounded when they clashed against each other.

In this shot, we witness that diligence through the supplies surrounding Chris (Val Kilmer). Altogether, it’s not a very colorful shot. The most prominent colors are in the top right corner. Blue hues win the day. Surrounded mostly by metal and a concrete grey floor, they take on a metallic tone and make for a lifeless mood. Otherwise, two things are obvious. The red is blood, and Chris is in a poor state of health. That’s where the cool colored ingredients come in. Mann picked an oxygen machine with emerald knobs and blue accentuation. He chose a seafoam green oxygen cord that matches the packaging for the bandage material on the table, which is covered in a navy and cornflower blue that transmit a pensive melancholy once again. In a shot like this, green represents vitality and healing, as it often does. Think of the budding life that springs forth from fresh vegetation and the solid green that colors the cross symbol for pharmacies.


The Insider (1999)

Michael Mann Color Theory Insider

Mann’s most universally acclaimed picture, The Insider is soaked in vivid blue-green two-tones contrasted with pitch-black shadow (thanks once again to Spinotti). It’s a procedural, 157-minute chiaroscuro thrill ride. According to Mann scholar Steven Rybin, “sea-blue tonalities […] form a stylistic precedent for the way Mann often links blue and gray color schemes to the existential crises of his characters,” with Jeffrey Wigand (Russel Crowe) chief among Mann’s existentially frayed men.

While hitting a few balls at the driving range to knock off some steam, Wigand realizes he is being followed by a man who is by no means trying to conceal himself. We see Wigand staring him down with a perplexed concern. The elaborate lighting set-up off-screen paints Wigand’s silvery hair and pale skin in a fluorescent Tiffany blue that bleeds onto the grey wall behind him and looks more like a muted green next to his sky-blue button-down. The bluer hues convey the seclusion and depression weighing down Wigand. Working with the shadows, they also represent his unfolding transparency, which ironically digs his situational hole deeper. (Mann once said, “I like the truth-feeling I receive when there’s very little light on the actors’ faces.”)

The greener tints indicate his confusion and the greater mystery at hand. Who is following him? What are they going to do? When are they going to stop? The greens could also be read as a sign of protection, which is a common color theory reading of green tones that veer more toward aqua. What we do not see is the man staring right back at Wigand unflinchingly, as if to threaten him. However, we do see the man thematically represented in the white tanker unit in the background, as if it’s reflecting his presence. In Mann’s films, white regularly represents institutions, whether they are the just type led by Will in Manhunter or the corrupt kind trying to instill fear for the sake of profit in The Insider.

Wigand finds himself targeted by institutions that seek to destroy him and his credibility in the public eye despite trying to do the right thing. His tumultuous journey is laden with lose-lose situations, much like this one, which presents him with the option of minding his own business and being stalked or confronting the man he’s almost sure was sent to harm him. The sour existential dread is written in the colors as much as it is the expression on his face. What has he done? What has his life become?


Ali (2001)

Michael Mann Color Theory Ali

Ali is one of Mann’s less-appreciated films, but calling it “maligned” would be far from accurate. As Mann’s first foray into digital camerawork and his first screenwriting effort with more than one writing partner, Ali does feel a bit shakier than his previous work. But it’s considerably better than some of his late work and, ultimately, a damn impressive film, especially when it comes to the cinematography, which sprawls out across the color spectrum. This is the only Mann film graced by the presence of all-time director of photography Emmanuel Lubezki (The Tree of Life, Children of Men), and his presence is certainly felt.

Here, we have two shots in the same setting (though not the same sequence) that illustrate one of Mann’s most common techniques: extreme blue-green filters. Both shots capture George Foreman (played by actual heavyweight boxing champion Charles Shufford) training for his fight against Muhammad Ali (Will Smith).

The first shot, above, is drenched in turquoise, which evokes feelings and themes triggered by both blue and green depending on what surface the color sits on. In this context, the strength, stability, and gravity of blue is felt as strongly as themes of protection and defense elicited by green. Foreman is preparing for a historic fight with the greatest boxer of all time and he needs to be a tank when he enters the ring. The color filter is so strong that the image is almost monochromatic. The orange is the only color that survives the filter with some trace of what it might have looked like otherwise, so the color palette is complementary.

Michael Mann Color Theory Ali

The second image uses the same tint to dive deeper into characterizing Foreman as said tank. The effulgent rays of light above him — the same that soak the image of the ring — are likely white, but through Mann’s filter and the context of the image, they become a sinister green, framing Foreman as the antagonist from Ali’s perspective. Half of the image is taken up by the punching bag, which is a stark black that you better believe conveys aggression and power when it sits next to Big George. The fact that he’s loading up a punch that could puncture steel also contributes to his intimidating presence. Mann uses similar blue-green filter techniques to incredible effect when framing the villain of Thief.


Collateral (2004)

Michael Mann Color Theory Collateral

After The Insider and Ali, Mann enlisted cinematographers Dion Beebe and Paul Cameron and returned to neo-noir storytelling with Collateral. When the film came out, Mann said in an interview, “LA, especially at night, has the deep purple glow of possibility. Anything can happen.” The quote sketches the tone of Collateral perfectly in as little words as possible. And the bursting neon shot of Max the taxi driver (Jamie Foxx) walking apprehensively into the club captures the heart of the statement just as succinctly.

First off, we’re whacked with the deep purple glow of possibility. But the purple edges more toward blue, landing somewhere between a highly saturated violet and a phosphorescent sapphire. In the context of the narrative, Vincent (Tom Cruise) has just sent Max into the club to meet with dangerous gangsters on his behalf. In other words, we have no idea what will happen next, so the evocation of possibility and open-endedness that defines Los Angeles for Mann is prevalent. The purplish hue also represents royalty and power. After all, Max has just waltzed into a villain’s dance palace, and the look on his face shows it.

This is the only image on the list that sufficiently meets the standards of a triadic color scheme. Triadic palettes consist of colors that triangulate on the color wheel (e.g. blue-red-yellow, purple-green-orange). The red and yellow hues of the Spanish script are vivacious up against the glowing wall. Red represents the violence and anger of the film, which act as a prominent duo of themes.

Max and Vincent have a tense, bitter relationship throughout — as hostages and their captors do — only sprinkled with brief moments of connection. In this case, the yellow contributes to the chaos of the triadic palette, representing caution and giving off a vibe of anxiety-ridden insecurity regarding what’s to come for Max. As a whole, the image distinguishes what makes Collateral such a different LA movie than Heat when it comes to color. Critic Mark Olsen phrases it wonderfully: “If the LA of Heat was crisp, almost photorealist in its high-gloss intensity, here the night-time cityscape is rendered with a watercolor density.”


Miami Vice (2006)

Michael Mann Color Theory Miamivice

Submerged in jolting cool colors, Miami Vice is an electric romp around the Magic City chauffeured by an elite class of “go-fast boats,” private planes, and Beebe cinematography. But the wealthy villains of Miami Vice are not like those of Collateral or Thief. They’re much sillier, and, consequently, the film is hard to take seriously at times. The main villain lives in a jungle lair surrounded by waterfalls like sinkholes in the wild. However, this is still a Mann-quality film brimming with fervent cool-colored shots.

This aerial shot lands in the middle of the movie. We soar through the air behind another silver plane in one long single-take set to hammering, poorly chosen grunge metal music. At the end of the take, we arrive at the monochromatic shot pictured. One can catch traces of the sinkhole jungle through the waterfalls on the edge of the image, but not like in the landscape shots that precede it. That’s because this image is wholly focused on the extravagant wealth represented by the lush Sacramento green vegetation surrounding the mansion. The fullness of the jungle contributes to the feeling of prosperity and greed that the green elicits in the context of crime bosses, and the monochromatic aspect makes it feel all-consuming. Likewise, the dark green is an associative color that represents doom, danger, and corruption throughout the film.


Public Enemies (2009)

Michael Mann Color Theory Publicenemies

The brightest, most natural image of the bunch, this shot from Mann’s Public Enemies can be found in Melvin Purvis’s (Christian Bale) introductory scene. We see through his eyes. At first glance, one is captivated by the friendly, peaceful shades of green that are so rare in Mann’s films, especially those shot by Spinotti (this marks their fifth and most recent collaboration). Some are blotted and out of focus, while others are crisp and clear. It is an entirely welcoming shot if not for the man in the middle. The man is lying down because, well, he’s dead. The pursuant Purvis just shot him. Although, the image and the colors within are still primarily positive.

The lively, flamboyant greens represent the goodness and virtue of Purvis, whom we immediately know does not tolerate crime of any kind. The brightness of the greens in sunshine shows that he is a man who lives in broad daylight. He is a man with nothing to hide, unlike Pretty Boy Floyd (Channing Tatum), the criminal faceplanted at the opposite end of the orchard floor who is clothed in darkness, yet a rich darkness in navy.

The greens can also be associated with two of Purvis’s most essential tools: ambition and endurance. If not for them, he would never have caught John Dillinger (Johnny Depp), the infamous criminal who slipped through his grasp time and time again. The drastic difference in this shot from the others is the way it showcases Mann’s willingness to adapt throughout his career. He could’ve played into his legacy and thrown a soft blue-green filter on the lens, but instead he left it bare, letting the clarity, color, and texture of the image do a new kind of bidding for a new kind of character — one who sees clearly.


Blackhat (2015)

Michael Mann Color Theory Blackhat

Like the staple Tiffany blue and turquoise pictured in the shots of The Insider and Ali, this splashy, blue-green hue from the beginning of Blackhat is opalescent and probably best described by one of those two titles. Like the mountain image from The Last of the Mohicans, this is the opening shot of the film. The image sets the viewer up for a globalist spy thriller set in a digitized world. Naturally, the cool tones of digital espionage fare well for Mann and his new cinematographer, Stuart Dryburgh. Every computer screen, phone screen, TV screen, and other device’s screen plays right into his favorite cool color schemes. If you rewound one second, the title would be scrawled across the orb, which is the Earth. But it does not come across that way.

If anything, it seems more like a spherical ice rink that could use a Zamboni. The cold, scratchy tracings of global communication look like skaters’ paths cut into the surface of the globe. Here, the faded characteristics of the image give a different character to the blue-green color, which gives off a foreboding, unwelcoming tonality while still coming across as alluring.

The orb also seems translucent. Translucent surfaces — like butter paper or foggy glass — let light through, but the shape on the other side is typically hard to make out. In a film where the truth is often skewed, Mann’s use of translucent coloration is a finely measured move that conveys a greater sense of premonition and dishonesty than was already felt. The jazzy marigold electricity gives the image a complementary color scheme and represents humanity, life, and energy. It creates a mood of excitement, and in the context of Mann’s filmography, it could be seen to represent the modernity that has permeated his career.

Copyright © Cinenus | Powered by Blogger

Design by Anders Noren | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com