The film industry in one place - Articles, Reviews, trailers and hype!

Monday 30 April 2018

Westworld: ‘Reunion’ Is All About Taking Sides and Making Sides for the War to Come

“I’m gonna burn this whole fucking thing to the ground.”

Westworld’s second season continues with more fractured identities and broken timelines, and as much as the war has already begun it’s clear there’s far more to come. Last week’s three separate time periods gain another as we’re given a double dip into the relatively distant past. Beginnings, motivations, and more are all on the table with the driving theme being the need for various characters to choose sides for what’s to come.

Let’s take a look at season two, episode two of Westworld:

Red Dots

Preparing for War

Dolores (Evan Rachel Wood) and Teddy (James Marsten) lead hosts into the complex where Maeve blazed through previously and finds a pair of employees unaware of the carnage around them. She fixes that pretty quick and takes the opportunity to enlighten poor Teddy as to his own history. He’s so tantalizingly close to waking up, but while he’s understandably outraged towards the human tech it’s still not clear as to where he’ll land once fully enlightened. Will he stay by Dolores’ side, or will his sensitivity override her thirst for vengeance?

They head back into the park with the tech in tow with one goal. After being told that Delos will send hundreds of armed men in to quell the uprising Dolores sets out to build her own army. Her methods are pretty straightforward — first she asks other hosts to join, and if they say no she kills them, brings them back to life, and flexes that power to make them change their answer. She’s ready for the fight, but integral to her victory is something “an old friend was foolish enough to show” her long ago. It’s not a place, but a weapon, and it’s something in the park that young William (Jimmi Simpson) revealed to her many years prior. (An excavation, or the machine for excavating? A machine capable of digging out a lake perhaps?)

Her quest for soldiers sees her cross paths with Maeve (Thandie Newton), but that doesn’t put them on the same path. “Revenge is just a different prayer at their altar, darling, and I’m well off my knees,” says Maeve by way of declining Dolores’ invite to join the rebellion, and she pushes further by asking eternally distraught Teddy if he feels free under his girlfriend’s leadership. I expect that answer will come closer to the end of the season.

Older William, aka the Man in Black (Ed Harris), is on the hunt for his own army, but he’s having a far tougher time of it. He saves Lawrence (Clifton Collins Jr.) from a hungry ant hill and tries explaining to the host what’s happening, but while Maeve and Dolores can reprogram and enlighten the MiB has only his words. “Dead isn’t what it used to be,” he says before telling Lawrence of his intention to burn the park to the ground. He takes a stab at recruiting some hosts only to be told that this game — “Find the door.” — was meant solely for him and he must play it alone. “Fuck you Robert,” is his perfectly disgruntled reply. It’s funny, but it’s fittingly exactly what he wanted — a game in the park that’s his to solve and win.

How It All Began

The timeline closest to our own sees Arnold (Jeffrey Wright) and Dolores talking in highrise condo overlooking a cityscape lit from above by the stars. He tells a barely glimpsed Ford that she’s not ready yet for some event, and instead Arnold takes her for a stroll outside. She’s enamored by the beauty of it all, but when he shows her the new house being built for his family the conversation leads to a singular piece of judgment. Arnold suggests that maybe humans aren’t the ones who deserve the beauty of the world, and what should have been a throwaway comment with a machine is instead logged deep into Dolores’ memory banks.

Logan (Ben Barnes), meanwhile, is attending the event that Arnold and Dolores have skipped. It’s a pitch meeting from representatives of something called the Argos Initiative. Logan mentions how tired he is of people wanting his money for their VR/AR projects — the presence of startups pitching virtual reality and augmented reality suggests this timeline isn’t too far beyond our own 2018 — but he quickly discovers that there’s something far more exciting for sale here. He’s the only human at the bustling cocktail party he’s attending, and he’s blown away by the implications.

Reunion D

A Later Past Revealing the State of the Now?

While Logan was floored by the physical fun and whizbang technological achievements behind the Argos Initiative, another thread occurring after his visit to Westworld with William in season one sees a competing agenda. Logan wondered last time how William would take his place at Delos, and this is how — William visits Westworld with Logan’s dad Jim (Peter Mullan), the Delos head honcho, and he pitches the businessman on the park’s true value. It’s not about fun… it’s about collecting data. So yeah, it’s Facebook with DNA crotch swabs and video recordings.

One line of note here suggests a possible clue about the state of the show’s “present” world. William tells Jim that in twenty years “this will be the only reality that matters.” He could mean that this will be the sole source of massive profit for the company, but what if the line refers to something happening out there in the real world? What if the real world is dying, and “created” ones like Westworld offer the only hope for people (the wealthy, presumably) to continue living. Hosts have their own form of consciousness, but what if the end goal here is to give people a host body in which to store their own human consciousness? People will survive whatever plagues the outside world by “living” in artificial bodies that are resistant to the threat. Look, I’m just spitballing here…

A party sometime later reveals William’s plan has come to fruition as he takes the reins of Delos while Logan sits in the shadows. He’s clearly distraught over being shunted aside (and maybe a little bit drug-addled too), but he mentions something that’s either melodramatic and overblown or dangerously relevant. Logan says the world is burning and that those celebrating above (the wealthy board members) have lit the match, “May your forever be blissfully short,” he says, but is it sour grapes or does he know something about the state of the world? We’ve only seen the glorious outside world during this time frame — maybe it’s not quite faring as well in the “now” of the uprising.

The final scenes from this time frame show William talking to a paused Dolores, and it’s notable that she’s once again naked on a stool. He’s the one dehumanizing her, and like any self-respecting men’s rights activist, he’s taking the opportunity to blame her for his actions. “I can’t believe I fell in love with you,” he tells her before suggesting she’s not even a “thing” and is instead a mere reflection for people like him. He’s a bad dude, and unfortunately, the structure of the show means we won’t get to see his smug mug get his comeuppance.

But, and, what…?

  • “We’ve toiled in god’s service long enough, so I killed him.”
  • I can’t be the only one entertained by Ed Harris (The Truman Show) cracking wise about asshole gods in the sky watching our every move.
  • Is the outside world dying? We know Dolores is planning on killing everyone, but Logan’s comments regarding the world burning suggest something more literal than figurative.
  • Why haven’t we seen an old man Logan yet?
  • We get a super brief glimpse of Armistice here — she’s the sheriff when Jim and William visit the park — but hopefully we’ll get far more of her soon.

Keep up with our Westworld coverage.

The post Westworld: ‘Reunion’ Is All About Taking Sides and Making Sides for the War to Come appeared first on Film School Rejects.

In Darkness - Trailer

  In Darkness - Trailer
Blind pianist Sofia (Natalie Dormer) overhears a struggle in the apartment above hers that leads to the death of her neighbor Veronique (Emily Ratajkowski). It is the start of a journey that pulls Sofia out of her depth and brings her into contact with Veronique’s father, Milos Radic (Jan Bijvoet), a Serbian businessman accused of being a war criminal. Sofia is drawn into a dangerous world of corruption, investigating police, hitmen and the Russian mafia – a world with links to Sofia’s own hidden past and a path of revenge she has kept hidden until now.
Directed by: Anthony Byrne
Starring: Natalie Dormer, Ed Skrein, Emily Ratajkowski, Neil Maskell, Jan Bijvoet, James Cosmo, Joely Richardson

Book Club - Trailer 2

  Book Club - Trailer 2
DIANE (Diane Keaton) is recently widowed after 40 years of marriage. VIVIAN (Jane Fonda) enjoys her men with no strings attached. SHARON (Candice Bergen) is still working through decades-old divorce. CAROL̢۪s (Mary Steenburgen) marriage is in a slump after 35 years. The lives of these four lifelong friends are turned upside down after reading the infamous 50 Shades of Grey catapults them into a series of outrageous life choices. From discovering new romance to rekindling old flames, they̢۪re each inspired by the scandalous text to hilarious ends.
Directed by: Bill Holderman
Starring: Diane Keaton, Jane Fonda, Candice Bergen, Mary Steenburgen, Craig T. Nelson, Andy Garcia, Don Johnson

Social Animals - Trailer

  Social Animals - Trailer
Zoe Crandle’s life didn’t exactly turn out the way she planned. She’s facing eviction, her business is going under and she is resigned to a life of one-night stands. Just when it seems her whole world is unraveling, she meets Paul, a fellow loveable loser, and the pair have an instant connection. There’s only one problem, Paul is married. With help from her best friend, Zoe devises a plan to save her business and salvage her love life. An honest, uncompromising comedy of modern relationships, Social Animals stars Noël Wells, Josh Radnor, Aya Cash, Carly Chaikin, Fortune Feimster and Samira Wiley.
Directed by: Theresa Bennett
Starring: Noël Wells, Josh Radnor, Aya Cash, Carly Chaikin, Fortune Feimster, Samira Wiley

Boundaries - Trailer

  Boundaries - Trailer
The more Laura (Vera Farmiga) tries to set boundaries in her life, the faster those lines are crossed. Her 12-year-old son Henry (Lewis MacDougall) is in trouble again at school. Her own penchant for adopting stray dogs and cats threatens to overwhelm their Seattle home. And her phone keeps ringing with calls she refuses to pick up—from her estranged father Jack (Christopher Plummer). Maybe Jack will stick around. For Laura, the chance to accept, forgive, and heal will never go away.
Directed by: Shana Feste
Starring: Vera Farmiga, Christopher Plummer, Lewis MacDougall, Bobby Cannavale, Kristen Schaal, Dolly Wells, Yahya Abdul-Mateen, Christopher Lloyd, Peter Fonda

Trailer for 'Evil Genius' Doc on 'America's Most Diabolical Bank Heist'

Evil Genius Trailer

"2:28 PM. August 28, 2003. A man walks into a bank with a bomb locked around his neck. This is a true story." Netflix has unveiled an official trailer for a new documentary series titled Evil Genius: The True Story of America's Most Diabolical Bank Heist, available in just a few weeks. This four-part series is another in Netflix's growing documentary line-up, from the same producers behind Wild Wild Country. And since I totally loved that series, I'm featuring this anyway since it's basically just a four-hour documentary split up into four episodes. Evil Genius tells the extraordinary story of the "pizza bomber heist" and the FBI's investigation into a bizarre collection of suspects. It only gets weirder, proving there is "more to the conspiracy and murders than was ever thought." This looks crazy twisted and baffling, indeed. Check it out.

Trailer for Netflix's Evil Genius: The True Story of America's Most Diabolical Bank Heist, on YT:

Evil Genius Documentary Poster

In 2003 in Erie, Pennsylvania, a robbery gone wrong and a terrifying public murder capture the nation's attention, and a bizarre collection of Midwestern hoarders, outcasts, and lawbreakers play cat-and-mouse with the FBI. Eventually, a middle-aged mastermind named Marjorie Diehl-Armstrong -- once a town beauty, now a woman grappling with mental illness -- is arrested. But 15 years later, Evil Genius proves there's more to the conspiracy and murders than was ever thought. Evil Genius: The True Story of America's Most Diabolical Bank Heist is co-directed by filmmakers Trey Borzillieri (Hunting Hitler, The Hunt for the Zodiac Killer) & Barbara Schroeder (Talhotblond). Netflix debuts Borzillieri & Schroeder's Evil Genius doc series streaming exclusively starting on May 11th coming up soon. Who wants to see this?

‘Tully’ Review: Motherhood and Magical Thinking

Jason Reitman returns with Charlize Theron & Diablo Cody for his warmest movie since Juno.

Jason Reitman has the most arresting career arc of any of the middle-range studio white boys. None of the Judd Apatow gang has the sensibility to ever make a good movie, but Reitman already made three: a trilogy of rising status that ended in 2009 with Up In the Air, a film that suggested Reitman was the kind of person you give Oscars to (it was nominated for six). Objectively, so to speak, Reitman returns to form in Tully, his most overtly likable movie since Juno, with moments of comedy and emotional revelation that rival any of Ellen Page’s awe-shucks discoveries. But it is informed by the kind of impalpable darkness that had defined the last decade of both Reitman’s and occasional screenwriting collaborator Diablo Cody’s careers, leaning closer to Young Adult, Cody’s last movie with Reitman, which brought Charlize Theron into their mix. Life sucks and if you’re not George Clooney, audiences only want to hear so much about it. This is a challenge for the cynical and world-weary, and Tully is an effort to answer it.

The trio finds their muse for such thoughts in motherhood, a profession that the chic phrase “emotional labor” fits like a glove. The mother in question is Marlo (Theron), an overworked mother of two who has another one on the way. She is married to the father of these children but he, Drew (Ron Livingston), like most people named Drew, is no help. He becomes slightly more helpful toward the movie’s end, but Tully isn’t the story of his change, it is rather incidental. Your man will never be of much value and Tully does good in looking elsewhere.

A wealthy brother enters, played by Mark Duplass, who offers help in the form of a nanny (the titular “Tully,” played by Mackenzie Davis), which flirts somewhat with the possibility of being a social comedy, a critique on how the rich have it so much better because of an un-unionized service economy populated by the young and less privileged. Reitman moves elsewhere—he is the son of Ghostbusters director Ivan Reitman after all—but Cody’s script digs around this territory to the movie’s most populist, comic effect. (the wealthy family has a dog named “Prosecco.”) This makes Tully his funniest movie since Juno as well.

And motherhood is bleak, Reitman and Cody report. Theron’s eyes decide, delicately but decisively, to bag like enormous Liptons. It is a hell that doesn’t stop and spoils the garden around them, spilling milk and toys like the blood and brick ruins of an ancient kingdom. I thought indeed of Game Night, where Livingston briefly appeared earlier this year to play against the type he’s cast in here and wondered if this was the future that the movie’s wannabe parents are supposed to long for with such studio-comedy vigor. The sequences in Tully rival the realism of Eisenstein in reporting relatable conditions with stylish panache.

The anguish of being a mother, for Reitman and Cody, is more than merely a very hard and endless series of chores. They see it as a mark of mortality: the third child is the catalyst for a mid-life crisis that, say, losing a job or a spouse would be in another movie. Indeed, those were the very events that unmoored Theron’s character in Young Adult, but here Theron reaches the notes of that movie’s emotional yelling-at-everybody climax in a far earlier scene, delivering it to her character’s own children. She has been unmoored from her life as she has lived it and opened to a space outside of it, which she quickly and brutally enters with the force of a thousand winds. This is merely where Tully begins.

When the saga ends, a doctor shows up to tell us that the movie was about post-partum depression, though aspersions have already been made that the diagnosis is more clearly post-partum psychosis, which would make Tully closer to Andrea Yates than the Joe Everymom that Focus Features would like her to be (Tagline: How The Mother Half Lives). This, itself, is an interesting critique of Reitman’s later and less popular works, that they enjoy the extremities of human nature too much to appeal the kind of boring people who show up for wide-release fare. They are stories of divorcees attempting to seduce married men, suburban moms falling in love with convicts, the star of the high school football team leaving his post to play MMOGs. They are closer to MFA short fiction than today’s lighter than air comedies or gritty dramas and critics are confused by documents that bear familiar faces but are absent the address of any recipient. (Despite his diminishing returns, Reitman has remained able to retain faces like Josh Brolin, Elizabeth Winslet and Adam Sandler in leading positions.)

Reitman’s last movie was a popularly and critically forgotten ensemble piece called Men, Women & Children which starred the likes of Sandler, Jennifer Garner, and Judy Greer but was commonly misread as an attack on internet culture because a number of people in it were on their phones. This gives a picture of the state of confusion surrounding Reitman. Others call his work satirical, an idea he’s been trying to shake off since debuting with an adaptation of a Christopher Buckley novel, 2005’s Thank You for Smoking. Reitman is instead interested in characters at the fringes of popular acceptance, people who are rarely seen as heroes, super or working class, be they lobbyists, unrepentant teenage mothers, or the guy who fires you. In Tully, he observes that to be a mother, to really be one, is to be similarly outside the heroic imagination. To be slim and yearning for the normative and nuclear family is more fashionable than to be actually surrounded by it. And so, Reitman drapes her in the hermeneutic cape of magical thinking, not unlike that of Edward Norton’s everyboy in Fight Club.

Resolution evades Tully because motherhood never ends. Its understanding of this fact elevates it above the standard studio movie that understands nothing about the lives of its viewers. (Marvel and Disney’s blockbuster epics at least are very frank about this.) To watch it, somewhat, is to mentally collect a listicle like “These Top 5 Moments in Tully Are So Relatable, They’ll Make Your Boobs Leak.” The story, which Reitman dedicates himself to ruthlessly, is less important than the world erected around it, enacted with brutally perfect precision by Theron, and this is where most viewers will find themselves happily inside.

The post ‘Tully’ Review: Motherhood and Magical Thinking appeared first on Film School Rejects.

A Beginner’s Guide to Watching Classic Movies on Amazon Prime

How anyone from a newbie to a seasoned classic movie fan can find Prime’s hidden old gems.

While there are great specialized streaming services for classic movies, sometimes you have to be resourceful with the streaming services you already have. Amazon Prime Instant Video looks like it doesn’t have much to offer when it comes to classic movies, but it actually has a large variety, much larger than other streaming services like Netflix. With the following tips, you’ll be able to find something for everyone, as long as it’s old.

Getting started

If you’re someone who is just starting to watch old movies, it can be pretty overwhelming, especially when there are many options out there. Prime has great introductory classic movies, the kinds you’ve probably heard of, but haven’t seen yet. Two of the most recognizable classic movies are free with Prime, Gone With the Wind and The Wizard of Oz. There’s a reason these are the most recognizable; they’re arguably the best movies to come out of the Golden Age of Hollywood and are good movies to introduce new people to old movies. Three other fantastic movies to get you into old comedies are Some Like It HotMy Man Godfrey, and His Girl FridayOnce you watch these and get a feel for older films, Prime will start recommending more classic movies for you!

‘Gone With the Wind’

Know what you’re looking for

Since Prime doesn’t have a classic movie genre on their page, it takes some searching to find all of the old movies available. It helps to know what you are looking for, whether that be a genre, actor, or director. You can search any of those, even the year a movie came out, and you’ll find plenty of films to choose from. Make sure you filter to just free with Prime movies unless you want to be tempted to rent any of the ones not available with your membership, but it’s pretty tempting.

If you’re feeling indecisive and don’t know what to look for, another good place to browse is the Recently Added Movies section, which includes new and old movies of all kinds. You can filter that section as well on the side of the screen by clicking the “Up to 1960” box to find the really old recently added movies like cult classic Reefer Madness and several Bela Lugosi creepy classics like The Corpse VanishesNight of Terror, and The Devil Bat. This section always changes so you’ll never run out of new things to watch!

Unpopular finds

Classic movie die-hards this section is for you. You probably think you’ve seen all of the good movies Prime has to offer, but even the most seasoned viewer can find new-to-you old films. There’s a huge variety of B-movie film noirs you’ve probably never heard of on Prime, much more than any other streaming site I’ve seen. Just search “film noir” and you’ll get some famous noirs like The Strange Love of Martha Ivers and Scarlett StreetYou can scroll through and find lesser known noirs if you’ve seen all of the popular ones. Please Murder Me!, The Red House, Pitfall, and many others on Prime represent the genre and time period just as well as famous film noirs.

‘The Red House’

Prime also has a surprisingly large selection of silent films as well. Everything from Charlie Chaplin’s The Kid to early Ernst Lubitsch silent comedies like The Marriage Circle. There are adventure, horror, comedy, and drama silent films all of Prime right now, most you might not have been able to find unless you search the genre. It’s truly remarkable that films almost a century old can be available to stream, so take advantage of them!

There are a lot of famous classic movies not available on Prime, but it has lesser-known films by your favorite stars that aren’t available to stream anywhere else. Along with His Girl Friday, Cary Grant films on Prime include Penny Serenade and The Amazing Adventure. There’s Hell’s House, Of Human Bondage, and Another Man’s Poison from Bette Davis on Prime. Even star Audrey Hepburn has a lesser-known gem on Prime, Mayerling. Obviously, some of the unpopular movies from your favorite stars aren’t going to be great, but you could find your new favorite you didn’t even know existed on Prime.

Prime is one of the best places to find old movies for free if you know how to find them. Once you start digging, you’ll find a ton of old gems you didn’t even know existed. They offer something different to your usual streaming, whether that’s newer movies or popular classics. If you’re new to old movies, Prime is a great place to start before you buy a membership for streaming sites that specialize in old movies. Figure out your taste in old movies and get to watching. Soon, your recommended sections will look like mine!

Screen Shot At Pm

The post A Beginner’s Guide to Watching Classic Movies on Amazon Prime appeared first on Film School Rejects.

Marvel Happily Lied to Sell You ‘Avengers: Infinity War’ And That’s Fine

Don’t Hulk out just because the movie played loose with its marketing.

THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS SPOILERS FOR ‘AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR.’

Was Avengers: Infinity War everything you were dreaming it would be? You’ve seen it, right? Based on box office dollars, it seems like most of the world found their way to the theater this weekend. I saw it a couple of times myself. I devilishly enjoyed watching the sad parade of devastated humans shuffling out into the lobby post-post-credits scene.

I’m not here to spoil the plot points of the film, but if you’re one of the remaining few that haven’t had a chance to see the movie yet, and you’re looking to go in fresh, maybe come back to me at a later date. We need to talk about the trickery that went into selling this blockbuster behemoth. Starting with that first trailer released back in November of last year. “There was an idea…”

What the hell, man? Marvel Studios wanted to get our blood pumping for this massive crossover event. Punctuating their first trailer with a triumphant charge of heroes racing to meet Thanos head-on in combat. That’s the kind of heroic team-up we experienced in the previous Joss Whedon iterations, and we couldn’t wait to see it replicated on an even grander scale for Infinity War. Earth’s Mightiest Heroes kicking ass and taking names, or kicking names and taking ass.

That’s not how the Russo Brothers roll. Looking at Captain America: The Winter Soldier and Captain America: Civil War, these siblings are all about dragging their protagonists through the muck before allowing them their champion status. Given the reins of two (not one) of Marvel’s most treasured event movies, the Russos were never going to let this first encounter with Thanos end in a cathartic shawarma lunch.

But where the hell is The Hulk?

Seconds after the Thursday screening of Infinity War, I received multiple texts from friends asking me that very question. Not only did the trailer promise a climactic battle featuring our favorite big, green rage monster, it implied that our Avengers would meet the Mad Titan in glorious combat. That kinda happened. Just replace “glorious” with “futile.”

Scott Mendelson over at Forbes calls Infinity Wara triumph of false advertising.” He takes us back to that magical time in 2014 when Kevin Feige invited journalists to the El Capitan theater to unveil their Phase Three slate. That’s where they jokingly revealed Captain America 3 as The Serpent Society before pulling a “Gotcha!” with the actual Civil War branding. He reminds us that Avengers: Infinity War was originally sold as a two-parter. Mendelson takes Feige and the Russos to task for falsely conveying the third Avengers film as a complete entity.

Could the dissatisfaction some feel stumbling out of Infinity War have been alleviated if Marvel had been upfront with the cliffhanger ending? Does advertising the climactic presence of The Hulk only to keep Banner’s seemingly floating head trapped inside the Hulkbuster armor amount to false advertising? Why hide Doctor Strange’s levitating body on Titan with Peter Parker’s confused reaction shot?

Marvel has always been sneaky with their trailers. Early breakdowns of the Thor: Ragnarok teaser contained snippets of Odinson with both eyes wide open. A few extra bucks tossed at some effects house hid Thor’s ocular wound not only in the trailer but also in the Comic-Con footage shown months earlier. Our own Infinity War trailer breakdown paid particular attention to which Infinity Stones were contained in Thanos’s gauntlet. Turns out that didn’t matter because Marvel digitally masked their colors.

Infinity War Art Poster

Speaking of Comic-Con, while Hawkeye was hidden away from most of the advertising surrounding the film, he did make a tiny appearance stuck between the Hulk and Bucky in Ryan Meinerding’s triptych illustration handed out to fans in San Diego (seen above). The Russo Brothers teased at “a long play” story involving the character, and that our patience will be rewarded eventually. At the very least, we thought Clint Barton would pop up in a post-credits stinger or something. Uh-uh. Meinerding did not need to bother penciling that poor chap in the corner.

Should we feel cheated? Personally, I’ve never been bothered by marketing misdirection. As much as I was anticipating some serious “Hulk Smash” in Wakanda, I ultimately appreciated the punishing climax we received at the hands of Thanos. Much of Infinity War was about withholding satisfaction and testing the nerves of the audience. Marvel has earned our trust with their track record, and they’re now happily testing our faith.

Would it have been more honest if Marvel had been upfront with the two-part story? Did the Russos lie to us when they insisted that Infinity War and Avengers 4 are two separate movies? Do you have a right to be frustrated?

We thought Infinity War was going to be the ultimate Avengers film. In actuality, the film exists to tell Thanos’s story. For him, there is a beginning, a middle, and an end. He is the character who gets the complete story. The Russos were not lying on that front.

Of course, you have the right to be frustrated. I totally get it. Infinity War is a brutal film if you love these characters as much as I do. We saw the Hulk in Wakanda and we were anticipating that action extravaganza. We can never trust a trailer again.

That’s a good thing. Why even bother with them? We’re going to shell out our cash for whatever they feed us, and as long as they deliver on the film itself we’ll keep coming back for more.

The post Marvel Happily Lied to Sell You ‘Avengers: Infinity War’ And That’s Fine appeared first on Film School Rejects.

Highlights from Tribeca’s ‘Schindler’s List’ 25th Anniversary Reunion

Steven Spielberg and cast on their arduous journey of making the 1993 classic.

The 2018 edition of Tribeca Film Festival hosted an emotional screening on Steven Spielberg’s 1993 Holocaust masterpiece Schindler’s List (winner of 7 Oscars out of the 12 it was nominated for) on the 25th anniversary of its release. The evening was capped off by an on-stage conversation with Spielberg, Liam Neeson (Oskar Schindler), Ben Kingsley (Itzhak Stern), Caroline Goodall (Emilie Schindler) and Embeth Davidtz (Helen Hirsch), moderated by film critic and journalist Janet Maslin, during which the filmmaker and his cast looked back on their experiences filming Spielberg’s harrowing historical epic. “I haven’t felt the [same] kind of pride and satisfaction and sense of real meaningful accomplishment since Schindler’s List,” Spielberg said. “I’m so very proud.”

Here are the highlights from the memorable evening at New York City’s Beacon Theater.

Reflections on watching the film 25 years later.

Spielberg: Well I haven’t seen this film with an audience since the premiere in Germany and Krakow and in Austria. 25 years feels like 5 years ago. The last time I saw the film was when I had to do the transfer from the negative to the Blu Ray, and I didn’t run the sound because I just wanted to focus on the pictures. One of the things I [noticed] was at the very end. I was operating the camera for the final scene where all the Schindler Jews are going past Oskar Schindler’s gravesite, and putting the stones on the grave, and the long lingering look that Emilie Schindler gives her husband’s grave….she had never been to that cemetery ever in Jerusalem, and it was the first time she had seen his grave.

Goodall: It was like seeing it for the first time and yet remembering everything if that makes sense. It was so immediate, it doesn’t feel like 25 years at all. But I think for me, I just felt every scene was a tiny masterpiece in its own right, and that was a revelation because I’d always seen it as a whole in a way and then I saw just how carefully Steven put it together, how detailed everything was and just how perfect every performance was. From just someone who had one line or even a look, and that is a testament to your genius, it really is [Steven].

Davidtz: I was struck by the absolute beauty of every frame, of how everything is like a sculpture, every frame was beautiful. And yet watching it, particularly the beginning, I thought there’s such a terrible relentless sense of what’s to come. And lots of things that I’d forgotten, I’d forgotten that Schindler was arrested. I guess in the sort of selfishness of youth, I was focused on my own, what was I doing, and maybe forgot the whole. And I thought so much about 25 years what’s happened in the world, what’s still happening in the world and in some ways you can’t help but think of about how relevant it still is.

Robin Williams called Spielberg every week to lighten up the filmmaker’s mood.

Spielberg: Robin knew what I was going through. Once a week Robin called me on schedule, he knew exactly what time it was in Poland. He would do 15-minutes of standup on the phone. I would laugh hysterically because I needed to release so much. The way Robin was on the phone, he would always hang up on you on the loudest, best laugh you’d give him. That’s it. Never said goodbye.

The crew encountered anti-Semitism during the shoot in Poland.

Kingsley: A German businessman walked across the bar [toward actor Michael Schneider] with total impunity and asked, “Are you a Jew?” Michael in shock said yes. He mimed a noose around his neck his neck and pulled it tight. And I stood up.

Spielberg: He did more than stand up. And one time, [Fiennes] was standing in his uniform between shots. And a woman called him, she said how much she loved his uniform and she wished all of you were here to protect us. There were swastikas sometimes painted overnight just for us.

The final scene of survivors adding stones around Oskar Schindler’s grave wasn’t in the script at first.

Spielberg: Three quarters into [filming], I started waking up in the middle of the night, fearing that people who’ve seen Schindler’s List will not believe Schindler’s List. I feared that because I’m so known for films that are not like this. Was people perception of me and my own perception of myself enough to present this movie as truth…which it was. It was the truth, but also the recreation of true events. Then it occurred to me, what if we could get as many of the Schindler’s Juden, the Holocaust survivors, put stones around Schindler’s grave? That wasn’t in the script. That was a desperate attempt from me to find validation from the survivor community itself, to be able to certify that what we’ve done was credible.

Spielberg felt resentment about making Jurassic Park at the same time.

Spielberg: I didn’t want to miss the winter for [Schindler’s List]. I knew I had to be shooting it in January—it came together awfully quickly. When I finally started shooting, I had to go home about two or three times a week and get on a very crude satellite feed to Northern California to be able to approve T-Rex shots. It built a tremendous amount of resentment and anger that I had to do this; that I had to actually go from Schindler’s List to dinosaurs chasing jeeps. All I could express was how angry that made me at the time. I was grateful later in June, but until then it was a burden.

A Seder dinner served as an icebreaker between Spielberg and many of the German and Austrian actors playing cruel Nazi officers.

Spielberg: Most of the actors who played the Polish Jews were from Israel, and I wanted most of the Germans to be German or Austrian. And I just know it was a very hard thing for me to see the uniform and to give instruction in the moment. But when they wanted to talk about Jaws or ET for the first couple weeks, I didn’t want to engage in anything but the work. They were so kind, and such good actors, but the uniform stopped me. And when I said ‘action’, the power that came out of all of them…that one scene where that really kind Austrian actor was shouting at [Ben Kingsley], ‘your papers Jew, your papers’… He was a very gentle, sweet man, and a tremendous actor, but he terrified all of us in that scene. I couldn’t talk to them other than directing. And then Passover happened. And someone organized a Seder in the hotel, and we went to the Seder and we had Haggadahs in front of all of us and everything was in the middle of the table, and then suddenly the German cast came in and the German cast sat next to the Israeli cast and they read from the same Haggadah…German, Israeli, German, Israeli, and I started crying. That broke me. And the next day I talked about ET, Raiders of the Lost Ark, whatever they wanted to talk about.

A lot of the set pieces and acting were based on real trauma.

Spielberg: Like when [the women] entered the bathhouse (when we think there is Zyklon B gas instead of showers) and the Health Action. The actors stopped acting and they existed in reality of the experience. We had two Israeli girls in that scene, who couldn’t shoot for the next three days because they had breakdowns. There was trauma everywhere and we captured that. The Health Action was the most dramatic day of my entire career, having to see what it meant to strip down to nothing. And then completely imagining that could be their last day on earth. It went beyond anything I ever experienced before.

Liam Neeson’s first day on-set was at the gates of Auschwitz.

Neeson: There was a lot of stuff going on at that time. I was falling in love with my wife, who’s passed away, and I was feeling unworthy, even though Steven had cast me in this, I really did feel unworthy, and I’m not looking for smoke to be blown up my ass. I had just come off Broadway, and Steven wanted me to put on weight – his office gave me protein powders that I tried to take. I was throwing up, I couldn’t take it (however pints of Guinness did work.) And then, I finished the play I was doing on a Sunday afternoon, flew to Poland on Monday, had very hurried costume fittings. On Wednesday morning, incredibly early, we were at the gates of Auschwitz, 5, 5:30, 6 am, freezing cold…train, guard dogs, German actors, the whole shebang. And Steven pacing up and down, very nervous, and everybody on tenterhooks. I was on a set, quite nervous, wondering when we would get to my little bit, pulling the little Jewish girl, saying “I need her to polish the inside of a metal casing”. Branko Lustig (producer and actor), looking at the real huts of Auschwitz comes up to me and says, “you see that hut there? That was the hut I was in.” And it hit me, big fucking time, boy, big time. So I did my little scene, and my knees were really shaking, And I kept saying the line wrong.

Ben Kingsley and Liam Neeson had a wonderful on-set friendship.

Kingsley: We used to have ritualized glass of vodka some evenings. I remember there were times when Liam’s magnificence and generosity mirrored his character – we were both so exhausted and he was like a general, giving me this vodka glass and said, “Let’s just do our job.” That beautiful. That simple. He is a wonderful man.

Neeson: You just reminded me—when the Jewish actors and actresses were coming back from particularly arduous days, we did stay on and buy them drinks. That was lovely, I remember. We would hug them…those were lovely evenings.

The post Highlights from Tribeca’s ‘Schindler’s List’ 25th Anniversary Reunion appeared first on Film School Rejects.

Guillermo del Toro’s ‘Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark’ Has Found its Home

The children’s horror anthology will finally stir your elemental fears theatrically.

We all know the story. The urban legend in which a couple necking on lover’s lane gets spooked by a scraping sound circling their parked car. They speed off in a fright, and after gaining safe distance from the potential danger, they discover a prosthetic hook dangling from their door handle. The fledgling lovers escaped death from the piercing weapon of a hook-handed serial killer. Initiate goosebumps.

“The Hook” was a story told to me by various friends in grade school, and one I graduated in telling to other friends and family. It’s a classic campfire story, designed to send shivers down your spine, and torment the nightmares of susceptible youth. The tiny narrative also happens to be just one of 29 like-minded horrors found within Alvin Schwartz’s original “Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark.”

The three-part collection gathers some of the most diabolical and horrendous acts of folklore, and barely waters them down for children’s consumption. If your teacher was cool enough, you could always find them on the classroom library shelf. If your teacher was a square, you had to dig a little deeper to devour these terror tales. I always had a copy hidden under my bed.

For years, Hollywood has been attempting to bring these ghoulish delights to the silver screen. Late last year, we reported that Norwegian filmmaker André Øvredal would be taking the reigns for the adaptation. That version of the script was expected to follow a group of teenagers investigating a series of strange deaths plaguing their neighborhood. However, the project was struggling to find financing.

Fear not. Variety is now reporting that CBS Films and Entertainment One will back the adaptation based on their enthusiasm for the recently crowned Best Director, Guillermo del Toro. While he will not be helming the movie, del Toro is still on board as producer and co-writer. This newfound adulation surrounding The Shape of Water looks to kick down a whole series of doors that once blocked his creative outlets.

Steve Bertram, the president of Entertainment One, exclaims his keenness for this dark pairing of material and producer:

Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark, led by the incomparable Guillermo del Tor, is such a chillingly fun ride that it’s sure to leave audiences around the world jumping in their seats.”

No doubt. For now, del Toro seems like sure-thing for studios. Whatever you thought of the quality of the film itself (p.s. it’s awesome), The Shape of Water revealed a mass audience willing to accept del Toro’s freaky nature. He has an opportunity to plunge further into his demented imagination than he’s ever gone before, and he’s damn well going to take advantage of every opportunity that comes his way.

The short stories provide plenty of jolts for the reader, but most remember the anthology for Stephen Gammell’s ghastly illustrations. For the film to land those deep-rooted primordial fears, Øvredal and del Toro’s design team have to replicate those chilling paintings. Gammell’s work succeeded because of its delicate balance of palatable dread. Those covers always forced you to muster courage before cracking the spine.

Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark has the potential for big dollars. Nothing too gory, or revolting. The stories are sharp scares designed for a PG-13. Think of the success of A Quiet Place. Here is another horror film that feeds off conceptual terror, unnerving you mentally before they even reveal the threat visually. Everything goes bump in the night.

The post Guillermo del Toro’s ‘Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark’ Has Found its Home appeared first on Film School Rejects.

‘Supercon’ Review: Revenge Against the Nerds?

A crude film that punches down on the audience most likely to enjoy it.

I’ve never been to Comic-Con. Or any con variant, really. The mammoth conventions in San Diego and New York have always had a rose-colored tinge though, appearing like a joyous union of like-minded fans connecting and celebrating their beloved interests. Even the smaller town cons seemed amazing, though a bit sadder and usually full of faded celebrities from times past. But they still represented a haven for the nerd community, something I found endearing.

The makers of Supercon have a very different vision of conventions and their attendees. The team certainly seems to have spent their time in what the film portrays as trenches. Director and co-writer Zak Knutson, who has made two Marvel documentaries—one chronicling the company’s rise from pulp to pop and the other spanning the seventy-five years of Captain America—is likely well-versed in fan culture. Additional writers, Dana Snyder and Andy Sipes, have worked on many shows that would have them attend conventions around the country like Aqua Teen Hunger Force and the upcoming Dallas & Robo.

In the film, comic conventions exist primarily as a paycheck for the celebrity guests, many of whom struggle to find steady work. Former child star Keith Mahar (Russell Peters) comes to Supercon after his wife has left him, leaving him extra strapped for cash as divorce lawyers and bills loom. The days are long and he often goes unrecognized when he refuses to wear the turban his character wore in the pre-PC 80’s television show. When he is recognized, it is usually accompanied by the storyline-derived nickname “Ball Cancer Kid” or a quick punch to the groin by the egotistical star of the show, and main draw of the convention, Adam King (Clancy Brown). Between these degrading run-ins and signing autographs, Keith gets to see his fellow low-ranking industry friends: childish cartoon voice-over actor, Mark (Ryan Kwanten); sardonic comic book writer, Allison (Maggie Grace); buoyant 80’s TV star, Brock (Brooks Brasselman). After a fight with King, all four members get fired and banned from the rest of the event by the convention promoter Gil (Mike Epps), pushing the guilty Mark to craft a plan and make amends.

To make their money, get revenge on King and Gil, and have a little fun at one of these conventions for once, he decides they should steal King’s paycheck, who charges seventy-five dollars for every autograph, and Gil’s profits from the weekend. The plan is simple enough, appropriately flawed and ill-conceived considering their experience with heists. However, it is hard to root for these unsavory heroes. They may not be as aggressively unlikable as King or Gil, but the group is by no means nice company. Mark sells the heist as an epic crusade to defend the fans from the corrupt celebrities and businessman stealing money from them, but they bully the convention and those in attendance as much as the characters set up to be the bad guys. They seem to hate their fans almost as much as they hate themselves. Did you know that nerds are fat, virginal, socially-awkward losers? This film will remind you and remind you and remind you.

The unnecessary and unfunny vulgarity persists throughout the film, culminating in one of the grossest bathroom scenes ever. Between the countless instances of masturbation gags, blow job miming, and excessive, unimagined cursing, we are meant to feel for these characters who are so different from the men they are trying to bring down. Keith’s big emotional moment comes when he tells Mark the depth of the troubles in his life including how he has lost his agent because he refuses to audition for stereotypical terrorist or convenience store clerk roles, something Mark could not understand as a white guy. This would have more weight if the scene where the two guys run the gamut of East Asian stereotypes while mocking Allison’s boyfriend didn’t exist.

Surprisingly, John Malkovich proves to be the heart of the film, a phrase I never thought I’d say. Introduced at the midway point, he plays Sid, a comic book writer friends with Allison who the team attempts to involve in the plan. He refuses at first, not looking for trouble, but comes around after witnessing King make a fan with Down Syndrome cry by refusing to sign anything without being paid. Sid is true north on the film’s moral compass, coming to the conventions to be with the fans and appreciate the art he has the chance to make.

Ultimately, the film squanders the potential of exploring the convention culture, a world we haven’t seen much of on film yet. It seems unsure of whether it wants to satirize fandoms, the greedy consumerism of conventions, or the lives of D-list and lower celebrities. Swinging wildly at all three, the film feels muddled tonally and rather long for its 100-minute runtime. When Sid interacts with the central team or King, the shadow of a film that could have been appears—one with a clear intention of its message and filled with deserving heroes. Instead, we are left with crass heroes who easily would have ended up like the villain if they had received a bit more success and fame. If what we see in Supercon is what the convention atmosphere is really like, the creators have effectively saved me the cost of admission.

The post ‘Supercon’ Review: Revenge Against the Nerds? appeared first on Film School Rejects.

‘Infinity War’ and Overkilling Death

Mourning the greatest casualty of the MCU’s crossover extravaganza.

This article contains spoilers for ‘Avengers: Infinity War.’

If you kill off half of the Earth’s mightiest and most beloved heroes and there is not a single tear to be found in a sold-out theater, something is terribly wrong.

This was the thought that plagued my mind far as I left the cinema after seeing Avengers: Infinity War. It’s arguably the weakest entry in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) since 2013’s Thor: The Dark World made even worse by how it was preceded by such a winning streak. Spider-man: Homecoming, Thor: Ragnarok, and Black Panther all demonstrated the MCU reaching new heights just before face-planting with their attempt at a crowning jewel, a clunky behemoth of overwrought CGI battles that is so overextended it recycles attack moves. (See: Loki and Tony Stark’s matching sneak-attack attempts).

But even worse than its unremarkable blur of fight scenes and overarching plot with the structural integrity of a sieve is the way Infinity War, in spite of numerous character deaths, feels emotionally as cold and sterile as a hospital room.

The particular strain of disappointment I felt after sitting through nearly three hours of Thanos’ unremarkable purple mug reminded me very much of what I felt after watching both Westworld and the latest season of Game of Thrones, which I found decidedly underwhelming. Considering the surface similarities between the three — i.e. epic scale sci-fi/fantasy — I wondered if maybe the same fundamental issue might be at work. And comparing the three I soon found a common problem, and that was the matter of death. Or, more specifically, how death is treated.

Because in all three, death has lost real meaning. In Westworld, it’s due to the fundamental nature of the show having primarily android protagonists. In Game of Thrones, it’s a recent development. The show in which warlords died of infected scratches has become a land of miracle cures for fatal ailments in which no one ever drowns. Between Theon being fished from the sea and an unconscious Jaime getting rescued from a watery grave, by the time Jon Snow falls through the ice it feels pointless to summon up even the faintest twinge of concern.

In Infinity War, it’s because the film loudly and clearly expresses its intentions of becoming the Boy Who Cried Wolf. While looking to go big by “killing off” half the characters you know and love, Infinity War pushes itself right out of genuinely shocking territory and into the realm of definite bullshit. Those quotation marks I added aren’t suggested by the film so much as printed in bold. As a general rule of thumb, if you want to maintain some doubt as to whether or not the characters you killed will actually stay dead, it is best to avoid those with announced sequels already in the works. Undermining death, in turn, undermines a narrative’s attempts to pack any sort of emotional punch like a supervillain loose in New York City wreaks havoc.

From the size of its villain to the length of its runtime to its body count, Infinity War clearly operates off the motto “bigger is better.” But emotional content doesn’t really work that way. “Going big” emotionally doesn’t mean widening the blast radius of the villain’s plan. Ironically enough, it means going small — working on the human scale. It means tapping into the kinds of fears, struggles, and hurts to which the average viewer can actually relate.

None of us know what it is like to have superpowers or to actually have the fate of the Universe in our hands. But we all know what it’s like to live in a mortal body and to have death brush against our lives in the passing of loved ones. When a narrative messes with the gravity of this relationship with death and mortality, it hugely limits its potential for meaningful dramatic content.

Things are, in a fundamental sense, defined by their absence. Light can be described as the absence of darkness, and vice-versa. Applying this to life and death, when a narrative behaves like death means nothing, life consequentially also means nothing. It’s fine if you’re Deadpool and going for snark with a side order of sarcasm, but if you want to work in the spectra of drama and tragedy, you’ve got a serious problem.

In its quest to go big, Infinity War makes itself one of the smallest and shallowest installments of the MCU thus far. Unfortunately, such irony seems to be becoming something of a trend — and the closest to a compelling tragedy any of the afflicted narratives are going to get.

The post ‘Infinity War’ and Overkilling Death appeared first on Film School Rejects.

Another Official Trailer for Gilliam's 'The Man Who Killed Don Quixote'

The Man Who Killed Don Quixote Trailer

"We shall have such great adventures together." Another trailer has debuted for Terry Gilliam's long-lost, long-awaited, highly anticipated film The Man Who Killed Don Quixote. It's currently set to premiere at the Cannes Film Festival, however the festival released a strongly-worded statement today (a coincidence but timing makes sense) about the legal battle it's stuck in - and that it might not premiere if a judge decides otherwise. This new trailer follows the first teaser trailer a few weeks ago, and it contains footage of Driver filming his version of a Quixote movie as well. This film is about an advertising executive who jumps back & forth in time between 21st century London and 17th century La Mancha, where Don Quixote mistakes him for Sancho. Starring Jonathan Pryce as Don Quixote, and Adam Driver as Toby, with Olga Kurylenko, Stellan Skarsgård, Rossy de Palma, Óscar Jaenada, Jordi Mollà, Jason Watkins, Sergi López. I think this looks very amusing, and hopefully entertaining, only time will tell. You never know with Gilliam.

Here's the second official trailer for Terry Gilliam's The Man Who Killed Don Quixote, on YouTube:

The Man Who Killed Don Quixote Poster

You can still watch the first trailer for Gilliam's The Man Who Killed Don Quixote here, for a bit more.

The Man Who Killed Don Quixote tells the story of a deluded old man who is convinced he is Don Quixote, and who mistakes Toby, an advertising executive, for his trusty squire, Sancho Panza. The pair embark on a bizarre journey, jumping back and forth in time between the 21st and magical 17th century. The Man Who Killed Don Quixote is directed by veteran American-born British filmmaker Terry Gilliam, director of the films Monty Python and the Holy Grail, Jabberwocky, Time Bandits, The Meaning of Life, Brazil, The Adventures of Baron Munchausen, The Fisher King, 12 Monkeys, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Brothers Grimm, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, and The Zero Theorem. The screenplay is written by Terry Gilliam and Tony Grisoni, based on the original novel by Miguel de Cervantes y Saavedra. This is expected to premiere at the Cannes Film Festival this summer. The film doesn't have any official US release date set yet. Stay tuned for more updates - visit the official website for more. Who's looking forward to this?

Second Trailer for Comedy 'Book Club' with Diane Keaton & Jane Fonda

Book Club Trailer

"I don't care what society says about women our age… The choice should be ours!" Paramount has debuted a second official trailer for the summer comedy Book Club, starring Diane Keaton and Jane Fonda. The movie is about four lifelong friends who have their lives forever changed after reading 50 Shades of Grey in their monthly book club. Yeah, that's this movie, so watch out folks. The cast also includes Candice Bergen, Mary Steenburgen, Craig T. Nelson, with Andy Garcia and Don Johnson as two of the "old flames" that return to their lives. As I said with the first trailer, this actually doesn't look as bad as it sounds, but it definitely does not look that good either. But hey, maybe it's just not for me, right? Take a look below.

Here's the second US trailer (+ poster) for Bill Holderman's Book Club, direct from YouTube:

Book Club Movie Poster

You can still watch the first trailer for the group comedy Book Club here, to see a bit more footage.

Diane (Diane Keaton) is recently widowed after 40 years of marriage. Vivian (Jane Fonda) enjoys her men with no strings attached. Sharon (Candice Bergen) is still working through a decades-old divorce. Carol’s (Mary Steenburgen) marriage is in a slump after 35 years. Four lifelong friends’ lives are turned upside down to hilarious ends when their book club tackles the infamous Fifty Shades of Grey. From discovering new romance to rekindling old flames, they inspire each other to make their next chapter the best chapter. Book Club is directed first-time filmmaker Bill Holderman, making his directorial debut after working as a producer and writing the script for A Walk in the Woods. The screenplay is written by Bill Holderman and Erin Simms. Paramount will open Book Club in theaters everywhere starting on May 18th.

New US Trailer for John Woo's Totally Crazy 90's Action Film 'Manhunt'

Manhunt

"The return of the maestro!" Woo is back!! Netflix has debuted a brand new official US trailer for the release of John Woo's latest action film, titled Manhunt. It'll be available streaming starting this weekend, which is good news for those who want to see this totally crazy movie. Manhunt is about an innocent prosecutor who sets out on a mission to clear his name after being framed for crimes he didn't commit. Zhang Hanyu stars as the prosecutor, and the cast includes Masaharu Fukuyama, Qi Wei, and Ha Ji Won. This is actually a remake of the 1976 Japanese film Kimi yo Fundo no Kawa o Watare. It played at the Venice Film Festival, where I first saw it, and wrote a review about how it couldn't be more of a 90s action film - the kind you'd find on VHS in a video store and watch with friends. Now you can watch it on Netflix, and still enjoy.

Here's the final official US trailer (+ a poster) for John Woo's Manhunt, direct from YouTube:

Manhunt Poster

You can still watch the first official trailer for John Woo's Manhunt here, to see a bit more footage.

Action maestro John Woo returns to the mold of his classic The Killer with this remake of a classic 1970s Japanese thriller, about an innocent man who sets out to clear his name after his is framed for robbery and rape. Manhunt is directed by legendary action Chinese filmmaker John Woo, of many films including A Better Tomorrow, Just Heroes, The Killer, Bullet in the Head, Hard Boiled, Hard Target, Broken Arrow, Face/Off, Mission: Impossible 2, Windtalkers, Paycheck, Red Cliff, Reign of Assassins, and The Crossing previously. The screenplay is also written by John Woo; based on the book by Jukô Nishimura (turned into the film Kimi yo Fundo no Kawa o Watare). This premiered at the Venice and Toronto Film Festivals last year (read our review). Netflix releases Woo's Manhunt streaming exclusively starting May 4th. Who's in?

Official Trailer for Coming-of-Age 'All Summers End' with Tye Sheridan

All Summers End Trailer

"All I want to do is just be a kid." Gravitas Ventures has released an official trailer for an indie coming-of-age film titled All Summers End, from new director Kyle Wilamowski, making his feature debut. This indie film is about a boy, played by Tye Sheridan (from Mud, X-Men: Apocalypse, Ready Player One) who falls in love with a girl one summer, played by Kaitlyn Dever (from Short Term 12, Detroit). But he also has to deal with his guilty conscience after his role in a prank gone wrong. The film also stars Pablo Schreiber, Austin Abrams, Annabeth Gish, Ryan Lee, Paula Malcomson, and Bill Sage. Not bad. This looks pretty much exactly as it sounds, an emotional coming-of-age indie flick, so give it a look if you're curious.

Here's the official trailer (+ poster) for Kyle Wilamowski's All Summers End, in high def on Apple:

All Summers End

A teenage boy (Tye Sheridan) falls in love with a girl (Kaitlyn Dever), but after a summer prank goes awry, he must grapple with his guilty conscience. All Summers End, originally titled Grass Stains, is both written and directed by newcomer American filmmaker Kyle Wilamowski, making his feature directorial debut after working as a music supervisor previously. This premiered at the Santa Barbara Film Festival a year ago, and is just now being released in the US. Gravitas Ventures will release Wilamowski's All Summers End in select theaters + on VOD starting June 1st this summer. Anyone interested? Who wants to see this?

That Creepy Doll Will Be Back in a Third ‘Annabelle’ Movie

So the prequel to the prequel of ‘The Conjuring’ is getting a sequel…

The cinematic universe that formed out of James Wan’s The Conjuring has mostly been an unexpected hit so far in its life cycle. By virtue of being a franchise filled with macabre iconography, the series has a variety of different elements that can easily be spun off into potentially effective scary movies. But this spin-off business all started off small — with one eerie-looking doll — and it seems her journey is far from over.

The Hollywood Reporter has announced that a third Annabelle installment can be expected from New Line Cinema sometime down the pipeline. This will be a sequel to Annabelle: Creation, which is itself a prequel to the first Annabelle movie that was spawned from a single scene in The Conjuring. The Annabelle: Creation sequel doesn’t have a name for now but series screenwriter Gary Dauberman will pen the screenplay and also make his feature film directorial debut with the project.

Dauberman is responsible for a number of well-received scary movies from the Warner Bros. camp. Annabelle, his first entry into The Conjuring extended universe, either made no impression or the completely wrong one to most critics and audiences (although we liked it). However, 2017 was a great year for Dauberman. Having penned both Annabelle: Creation and the latest version of Stephen King’s IT, he had a hand in crafting some empathetic horror films that are well worth our time. In these instances, Dauberman’s scripts tell stories about the plights faced by relatable characters hoping to preserve believable relationships. We can root for these people, and so we’re scared for them when bad shit goes down.

For the uninitiated, the Annabelle series centers on the titular doll, which is possessed by a soul-hunting demon. Annabelle’s unsettling silhouette and piercing eyes are just one facet of her potential to be frightening. Because of her, the characters we grow to love are subjected to supernatural occurrences borne from very weighty emotions. Annabelle: Creation is anchored specifically by grief when characters suffering from different instances of loss come into the crosshairs of the demon, making its tale ultimately creepy as well as heartbreaking.

This is pretty much the core ethos of The Conjuring universe as a whole, making the Annabelle films a promising extension of the franchise. For example, Wan’s own Conjuring films make us relate to their protagonists, the Warrens, by building up the strength of their marriage and focusing on the power they have as a unit despite their harrowing line of work. To think a relationship like that could be transposed into a series of doll movies seems absurd at first. The bond between two humans feels like it’s going to leave a stronger impression than anything a mostly-inanimate doll could offer.

However, Dauberman himself has acknowledged that the Annabelle films work because of the human protagonists surrounding Annabelle and not the other way around. So, it’s easier to be more hopeful about where he could take a third installment — even if the overall timeline in the Conjuring franchise keeps getting messed up.

When iHorror asked Dauberman about a potential follow-up to Annabelle: Creation last year, he was optimistic that the well of Annabelle stories is essentially bottomless:

I think [‘Annabelle: Creation’] will prove by the end of it that there is more to the Annabelle story that needs to be told. I mean, the mere fact that she’s a doll kind of allows that. How many kids out there have the same doll? Visually, I mean. […] Same doll but each kid creates a different back-story, a different history, a different story which makes their doll their very own even though it might look like a million others out there. It’s kind of the opposite for Annabelle. She remains the same but the people she encounters all have different stories and different fears and she’s going to use those for her own purposes until you discover — much too late — that she isn’t the toy… you are. And she’s playing you.

With two films within the Conjuring universe under his belt and more on the way — Dauberman also wrote The Nun, a spin-off of The Conjuring 2 that is due out this year — I’m willing to think Dauberman knows what he’s doing. The Annabelle: Creation sequel joins a schedule of upcoming films including the second chapter of IT as well as the movie adaptation of the horror anthology series Are You Afraid of the Dark?.

The post That Creepy Doll Will Be Back in a Third ‘Annabelle’ Movie appeared first on Film School Rejects.

‘The Trashers’ Could Be The Next Great Hockey Movie

The movie is being described as ‘Slap Shot’ meets ‘Superbad.’

Hockey may not be the most high-profile professional sport in the US, but it has definitely spawned some of the most memorable sports movies. The most legendary of them all is Slap Shot, starring Paul Newman and Michael “Sheriff Harry S. Truman” Ontkean (but not Adam Driver) as players on a minor league hockey team that resorts to violent play to fire up fans in their small, declining mill town. Slap Shot is awesome because it is authentic to the experience of being a blue-collar hockey fan but also entertaining enough to appeal to audience members who don’t know what a power play is.

Then there is Miracle, the Kurt Russell-led dramatization of the 1980 “Miracle on Ice,” when a group of American amateurs beat the seemingly indestructible Soviet Union team and went on to win Olympic gold. Miracle is the kind of inspirational underdog story that anyone can appreciate, whether you’re a sports fan or not. We also have Goon, the cult-classic comedy about a bar bouncer (Seann William Scott) who parlays his willingness to get violent into a gig as a minor league hockey enforcer. And of course, who didn’t grow up watching The Mighty Ducks?

Part of what makes hockey movies so appealing is that it’s a sport that is remarkably lacking in glamour. The lifestyles of these guys, especially those in the minor leagues — and let’s be real, all of the best hockey films are about the minors — are so much more relatable than in other sports. Also, hockey may not have the most fans in the US, but those fans are definitely some of the most passionate and are usually up for having a laugh over the ridiculous and niche nature of their favorite sport. Relatability, intensity, hilarity — when all of these ingredients combine, the result is, more often than not, movie magic.

That’s what Yellow Bear Films is hoping. According to Deadline, the fledgling production company (it was founded last year) has picked up a script from Billions writer Adam Perlman that chronicles the meteoric rise and fall of the most violent minor league hockey team in history. The Trashers tells the story of the Danbury Trashers, who racked up more penalty minutes in one season than any other team before or since, yet somehow also managed to have the best record in the league. The president and general manager of the team was 17-year-old AJ Galante, who was put in charge of the team by his father, “the local king of waste management.”

No director is yet attached to Perlman’s script, which is based on a Sports Illustrated article by Jon Wertheim and described as Slap Shot meets Superbad — a pretty winning combination in my book. Perlman and Wertheim are set to receive executive producer and co-producer credits, respectively, on the project. Tom McNulty, whose previous credits include The Benchwarmers, Date Night, and The Spectacular Now, will produce.

As a hockey fan and movie fan, I cannot help but be incredibly excited by a project as ridiculous-sounding as The Trashers. All of the little details lend the entire affair a tone of absurdity that proves truth is often stranger than fiction. Obviously, a lot will depend on the talent recruited from here, particularly the director and stars. In particular, it will take a special young actor to play the part of Galante without coming off as a spoiled rich kid jerk — unless that is the tone of the script, which I think would be a misguided move. After all, you’re going to want the audience to root for the Trashers and their unlikely leader, not be annoyed by them.

That’s one reason why Slap Shot is such a classic — it is impossible not to root for Newman’s charming player-coach Reggie Dunlop and his haphazard team, even the wildly violent trio of the Hanson brothers. If you’re going to focus on the enforcer side of hockey, like Slap Shot and Goon, you’ve got to make sure the characters are as good at winning the audience over as they are at racking up penalty points. But based on the source material, I have high hopes for The Trashers. 

The post ‘The Trashers’ Could Be The Next Great Hockey Movie appeared first on Film School Rejects.

Copyright © Cinenus | Powered by Blogger

Design by Anders Noren | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com