The film industry in one place - Articles, Reviews, trailers and hype!

Thursday 30 April 2020

New Trailer for South African Supernatural Thriller 'The Soul Collector'

The Soul Collector Trailer

"There's something in the yard. Something strange…" Shout has debuted an official US trailer for a South African horror thriller titled The Soul Collector, which originally premiered at the Fantasia Film Festival last year. It also played at the Toronto After Dark, Chicago, & Pan African Film Festivals last fall. Produced and set in South Africa, The Soul Collector is a "fresh new tale of demonic terror, with a captivating South African cast." An old man, fated to collect souls for eternity, seeks atonement after trading his daughter's soul. The film stars Tshamano Sebe, Keita Luna, Garth Breytenbach, Inge Beckman, Chris April, and Owam Arwen Mditshwa. Naming a main character "Lazarus" is just a little too obvious, isn't it? But looks like he gives the best performance anyway. Seems like there's plenty of super creepy moments in this.

Here's the new official trailer (+ posters) for Harold Hölscher's The Soul Collector, direct from YouTube:

The Soul Collector Poster

The Soul Collector Poster

In an attempt to start a new life with his young, fragmented family, bankrupt William Ziel returns to the farm he inherited from his estranged father. Lazarus, the farmhand who took care of his father in his lonely final hours, reappears soon after William, Sarah, and adopted daughter Mary arrive. A supposed chance meeting between Mary and Lazarus develops into a bond between two kindred spirits. But Lazarus carries a dark secret: a demon child with an insatiable appetite for human souls… now the Ziels' newfound domesticity is placed at unfathomable risk. The Soul Collector, originally titled just the number 8, is both written and directed by South African filmmaker Harold Hölscher, his second feature after one TV movie previously, and a few other shorts. This premiered at the Fantasia Film Festival last year. For info, visit the official website. Shout will release Hölscher's The Soul Collector direct-to-VOD on June 12th this summer.

Watch: Ben Strang's 'Beast' Short Set on an Island in Chesapeake Bay

Beast Short Film

"He's gone, okay?" This impressive short film won the Grand Jury Award at the SXSW Film Festival a few years ago, and is now available to watch online. Beast is a short film written and directed by Ben Strang, a Maryland-native filmmaker & photographer. Set on an island in Maryland's Chesapeake Bay, "which once hosted a vibrant fishing industry but now is slowly fading away in isolation and decline." The story follows a young boy named Daniel, played by Elijah Mayo, who recruits the help of a fisherman to figure out what happened to his father after a mysterious disappearance. It's actually a teaser for a series, not just a simple short, and not a feature pitch either. Which is why it ends right when it's getting good (you need to tune in "next week" to find out more!). Also stars Chantal Nchako, Jay Potter, and Helen Hedman. A review from SXSW states that the short has, "hints of Jaws and… the haunting mysteries of 'Stranger Things,'" and a mystery that "immediately draws to mind prominent storytellers like Steven Spielberg." It's worth a watch.

Beast Short Film Poster

Thanks to Omeleto for the tip on this short. Original description from YouTube: "Daniel is a young teen who lives on a small, rapidly eroding island is Maryland's Chesapeake Bay, which once hosted a vibrant fishing industry but now is slowly fading away in isolation and decline. He is also part of the island's only African-American family, and his father has vanished. With him and his mother due to move soon, he has little time to get to the bottom of his disappearance." Beast is both written and directed by up-and-coming filmmaker Ben Strang - follow him @benhstrang; or you can see more of his work on Vimeo or his official website. This originally premiered at the 2018 SXSW Film Festival as "Chapter 1" in a series, where it won the Grand Jury Award in the "Independent Episodic" section. Produced by Ben Strang, Lara Pictet, Jonathan Maurer. Featuring cinematography by David Bolen, and original music by Nicholas Jacobson-Larson. For more info on the short film, visit Omeleto's YouTube or Ben's website. To see more shorts, click here. Your thoughts?

Behind the Best Part of Netflix’s ‘Hollywood’

Ryan Murphy‘s Hollywood is an alternate history of Tinseltown in its Golden Age, a fantasy narrative in which the underdogs and the minorities win the respect they never got in our own timeline. Now we are able to relive the glamour of the 1940s while watching a wildly different story than we’re used to.

The worldbuilding is what makes the Netflix Original so enjoyable. That period of Hollywood seems so unreachable and unreplicable, but costume designers Sarah Evelyn and Lou Eyrich do the impossible. I got to pick their brains about how they recreated the era through what the characters wear on screen.

What was your research like for recreating the era?

Lou Eyrich: Sarah did all the work! [laughs] No, I had just come off of Ratched [Murphy’s upcoming series about the nurse from One Flew Over the Cookoo’s Nest], which is about the same time period. So, we carried over a lot of that research. I had a lot of books and other research, but that series takes place on the East Coast. This was Hollywood, so it was a whole different kind of research.

Sarah hired a historical researcher in New York who sent us amazing research that we weren’t finding here in the research libraries or online. There are a lot of books on Hollywood in the 1940s, including what Sarah and I have in our libraries. There are a lot of black and white photos, but it’s hard to find color photos.

Ryan Murphy had a very specific color palette that he wanted, so we kind of followed that anyway. That color palette did shift a bit when Sarah designed the Oscar episodes because we were trying to replicate it for the factual characters. Sarah really had to dig deep for color photographs for that.

Sarah Evelyn: We were lucky to have Lou come off a ’40s show because I definitely got the cliff notes. I did have to somewhat immerse myself in that era in order to make sure all that information made it into our show. Lou and Ryan have worked together, and Ryan has a lot of direction. Between their conversations, a lot of that gets refined and we get down to the old Hollywood color palette. It kind of started at gold and then we brought in some harvest tones. Then, Ryan was very specific about colors with specific characters.

Going back to research, I watched an endless number of movies. Even when I was doing something else, I would have a movie on in the background at home or at work. It helped me inundate myself with it. We also printed out all of our reference photos and covered all our walls with them in the fitting room so we felt like we were in an Instagram account of old Hollywood.

Lou Eyrich: She wallpapered the place! It was great.

Did you look at any specific designers from the 1940s, or did you take a broader approach to the fashions?

Sarah Evelyn: It was both. Especially because costume designers were so influential in the fashion of the period. Ryan is a really big fan of those costume designers. We looked at Adrian [Adolph Greenburg] a lot. We looked at George Hurrell’s photos a lot. We looked at the movies and the big costume designers of the time, like Edith Head and Walter Plunket.

Our researchers had access to Conde Nast archives but also written research as well. It wasn’t all about the photographs. A lot was in what had been written about the fashion at the time. We also ended up accessing Emily Post. We looked at big designers like Claire McCardell and other big American designers. Then we went to the written archives like issues of Women’s Wear Daily from the ’40s and Emily Post’s writing because a lot of fashion was tied to etiquette as well. We’d have to think, “Would she wear a hat in that place?” and then we had those writings for reference.

Hollywood Unit Rc

Did you have to learn a lot about history outside of just fashion to create these costumes?

Lou Eyrich: I would say absolutely. We wanted to read magazines in order to get our minds into what was happening in the world at that time. At the same time, this was Hollywood’s look at fashion during this time, which was all about the glamor of Tinseltown. We had to read about who was running the studios at the time. We had to read a lot about Rock Hudson’s early years to educate ourselves who was running Hollywood at that time. Sarah mentioned the etiquette, which had a deciding factor on when women wore gloves and hats.

Sarah Evelyn: Especially at that time, fashion was incredibly influenced by world events because the country was just coming off of World War II. There had been rationing that directly affected fashion like the lack of silk stocking available led women to use eyebrow pencils to draw seam lines up their shins.

How did you deal with the expectations people have for the characters based on real celebrities, and how did you go about dressing those characters?

Sarah Evelyn: We did a lot of research. A lot of these characters were based on real [people], but as Lou said, we were looking to dress Rock Hudson before he became a star. That was a place there wasn’t really photo reference of him at that time. It was a bit of collaboration between the actor and what research we were able to find, like knowing where he was from and what he was doing before Hollywood. He had just been driving a truck, so we thought he would be a little more simple. We were developing a closet that underlined the kind of character he was, which was this all-American guy who also had this effortless star quality.

Looking into the more one-off cameos like the celebrities at the Oscars and other appearances like Cole Porter, we would look into the research that was available and melt that with what the actor could pull off or what looked right for the character in our color palette. It was our aim to stay very true to the period and develop costumes that these characters certainly would have worn.

Did you have any sort of leeway with the costumes since this a fantasy version of this era?

Sarah Evelyn: I would say we were very committed to being period-correct while also using color in a way that lent itself to the story. Archie was our jazz baby, our natural artist type. There’s one picture where he’s in mint green pants, a burnt orange shirt, and a beige sweater-vest with maroon and forest green in it. Was that color combination common in the 1940s? Maybe not, but it was for Archie and it worked for him. We tried to be historically accurate while allowing the costumes to show our characters as well.

Lou Eyrich: I think we did go a little more Technicolor. There was a heightened sense of glamor and color, but the silhouette was very much historically accurate. Ryan gave his direction as well, like when Sarah designed the costume for Queen Latifah [who plays Hattie McDaniel], he was very specific about the kind of flowers in her hair and how they were placed. There were certain characters that Ryan wanted to portray as historically accurate as possible and then there were other characters, especially the ones that were fictional, that we could play more.

Sarah Evelyn: In addition to silhouette, we tried really hard to find a fabric that would look period, which can be really difficult. For example for the [gas station] uniforms, we had a big fabric hunt, because modern uniform material does not feel or look the 1940s.

Hollywood Unit Rc

Did you get any physical pieces from this era to use, or did you mostly recreate styles to use for the costumes?

Sarah Evelyn: We did get vintage pieces. It was a real hunt trying to find vintage clothing because there are so many period shows right now. First of all, Lou has accumulated a brilliant library of vintage sources. We and our shoppers hunted, hunted, hunted every weekend. Every time we heard a show was wrapping, we were first up to see what we could get from them.

We got a lot of vintage clothing, but we made a lot as well. We did that for a couple of reasons. One: a lot wasn’t available. Two: vintage sizes tend to be smaller. There aren’t shirts that accommodate men with longer arms, and most of our guys have long arms. Sometimes, technically, we had to remake. We would put some on our actors to see if they would work for them. Darren [Criss], Jeremy Pope, Samara Weaving, and Laura Harrier could go into a lot of vintage clothes, so they wore a lot of vintage pieces. A lot of the closets we made, and then we would use vintage pieces that we found for inspiration.

Lou Eyrich: There was this one dress we really loved for Holland [Taylor] that had this great chevron patterning. We loved it and Holland loved it, but the actual vintage piece would’ve needed so many alterations and it was in bad shape. It was easier to find fabric and remake it as is. We had this amazing tailor who was able to replicate the dress. That was an example of finding a piece we loved, but it wasn’t sustainable enough to last even an eight-hour workday without falling apart.

Is preserving those vintage pieces ever a factor in whether you’ll use them in the costumes or not?

Sarah Evelyn: Definitely, especially when they’re from the costume house and you rent them. Preserving is a very important consideration. When it’s something that you’ve bought, it’s a little different because someone else doesn’t own it. You could potentially risk that, but these costumes have to last for days. People take them on and off and eat lunch in them. We have to think if it’ll make it, because if it doesn’t, then we’ll have an even bigger problem.

Lou Eyrich: We had a few instances where women were allergic to wool. A lot of the pieces were made of wool since there weren’t synthetics. We would have to really scramble in those cases to find an alternative. We really wanted to use the vintage piece, but we couldn’t because it was a material issue.

Do current trends in fashion and beauty ever have an influence on what you can do with the costumes?

Sarah Evelyn: I think in this case no, but it’s hard to say because you’re always influenced by what you see. We had a specific color palette from Ryan. We really tried to stay true to the period. I feel like we created our own world here and there. Maybe there is unknown outside influence. For instance, there might be something an actress feels really works, and it might have something to do with her modern eye, but I remember us having conversations about how to adjust the modern eye. There’s what might look right for now, but we had to back up and make sure it would look right for the time.

Lou Eyrich: It’s almost the opposite. We found that with the ’40s look because it’s been copied in contemporary times, it was hard to make it look period. The Katharine Hepburn look — the high-waisted, wide-leg pant and the little blouses — is very much worn today. When we would put Henrietta (Maude Apatow) or Camille (Laura Harrier) in those looks it almost looked too modern. Once you put the hair and the shoes and the makeup together, it instantly looks back in the ’40s. Sarah and I both love the very tomboy-ish style and we love the high waisted pants with the blouses and maybe a blazer, so it’s funny when you wear it in your life and then you go to implement it to look like the ’40s.

Hollywood Unit Rc

What were your favorite scenes to find clothes for in this series?

Sarah Evelyn: I’d say my answer has three parts, but I gotta say I really enjoyed all aspects of the costuming. Working with Lou and the characters at the beginning for the initial fittings for Episode 1. Then there are two events, a party at George Cukor’s house and then the Oscars, and I would say those outfits were the biggest bang for your buck and fun in that way. I also really liked the more nuanced moments, like I really liked developing Jack’s wife Henrietta’s costumes. She was kind of a Hollywood-have-not. She was in Hollywood and her husband was trying to make it, so she didn’t have much. I would say developing the costumes for each character was really fun and meaningful.

Lou Eyrich: I agree with Sarah. More than a scene, I really did enjoy our first fitting with Dylan McDermott, where we got to collaborate with him. He came in knowing what he wanted to do with his hair, that he was going to smoke a cigarette, and that he’d like a ring on this finger. He had already been working on his character, so it was really fun working with him to figure out who is Ernie when he’s not in his uniform.

That was one of my favorite moments, but I was only on the pilot. I will say that how I saw Sarah working through the other episodes that the team worked at such a fast pace, as television shows often do. Some days she had two units going and she couldn’t possibly be in two places. I feel like she had to whip things together literally overnight and send it off with a little wing and prayer.

There are many moments I would see dailies and just be in awe that they were able to pull it off with such grace even though I knew there was a lot of panic-repeat-panic-repeat. The girls in the red dresses at the gas pump, they got they note two days before it was needed while working on clothes for a funeral scene and she just had to spit those dresses out. I look at those scenes and think they’re some of my favorites that she whipped together, but she probably looks at them and has a little PTSD.

The 50 Most Beautiful Shots of the ‘Indiana Jones’ Franchise

Steven Spielberg‘s Indiana Jones films are, quite simply, some of the most beloved action movies ever committed to celluloid. The franchise acts as a four-film highlight reel of every pre-show Saturday serial ever made, in other words: it’s just plain fun.

Photography on Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981), Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984), and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) was overseen by Douglas Slocombe, a titan of cinematography with an unparalleled 50-year career. Slocombe served as an auxiliary cinematographer for Close Encounters of the Third Kind‘s India sequence and Spielberg, enamored, resolved to work with Slocombe again. Slocombe’s intimate knowledge of black and white photography brought a distinctive high-contrast and purposefully staged look to the franchise (“high-level visual math shit” as Steven Soderbergh puts it).

Indeed, at times, Slocombe’s Indy films feel like a monochrome serial was accidentally shot in color, which more than suits the original trilogy’s debt to the noirs and adventure pictures of the 1940s. Slocombe’s skill was such that by Raiders he had stopped using a light meter, and was able to judge exposure, levels, and contrast on sight alone. This is all the more impressive considering that Slocombe was losing his vision during the 80s, with The Last Crusade proving to be his final film.

Sporting eleven prior collaborations with Speilberg, Janusz KamiÅ„ski was brought in as the cinematographer on Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008). KamiÅ„ski deliberately shot the film to emulate Slocombe’s visuals in order to secure a degree of continuity. “There’s a legacy and a strong following with these movies that you have to respect,” KamiÅ„ski told American Cinematographer. “An Indiana Jones film has to have that glossy, warm look with strong, high-key lighting. It’s suspenseful but not too dark — you always see things clearly.” Embracing the shift from war-era serials to B-movie monster features, Crystal Skull visually beats to a different drum. It’s the odd duck of the franchise to be sure, but an odd duck on its own terms.

The Indiana Jones films are a grand adventure, and to testify to this fact, we’ve pilfered the Blu-rays and selected fifty of the most beautiful shots from the franchise. And with that, take a peek at these priceless relics of action cinema:


Raiders of the Lost Arc (1981)

Cinematography by Douglas Slocombe
Directed by Steven Spielberg

Raiders


Raiders


Raiders


Raiders


Raiders


Raiders


Raiders


Raiders


Raiders


Raiders


Raiders


Raiders


Raiders

Next Page

Official Trailer for 'Crazyhot' Doc Film About the World of Chile Peppers

Edge of Extinction Trailer

"I don't see any reason that peppers won't get hotter." Hotter and hotter and HOTTER! Pick A Winner Ent. has unveiled an official trailer for an indie documentary called Crazyhot, a film about the wide world of chile peppers and chillis and various spicy peppers from all over the world. Join filmmaker Eric Raine as he explores three continents meeting leading farmers, scientists and food alchemists, as well as the community of devoted "chileheads" who use peppers in countless ways -- spicing up a bowl of chili, consuming chiles to the point of euphoric pain, uncovering the booming business of chile and examining Capsaicin's role in cancer research. Oh this seems like such a fun food doc! And the ultimate "hot doc" ha ha ha. Who doesn't love peppers and spicy food and chiles?! They're always a fine addition to any meal. Heat up this doc below.

Here's the official trailer (+ poster art) for Eric Raine's documentary Crazyhot, direct from Vimeo:

Edge of Extinction Poster

Hot and spicy food is enjoyed around the world, but for some, ultra-hot peppers are more than a flavor profile, they’re an obsessive passion. In the new documentary, Crazyhot, join filmmaker Eric Raine as he explores three continents in search of leading farmers, scientists and food alchemists, as well as the community of devoted "chileheads" who use peppers in countless ways -- spicing up a bowl of chili, consuming chiles to the point of euphoric pain, uncovering the booming business of chile and examining Capsaicin's role in cancer research. Raine seeks answers to burning questions as he introduces you to the wide, weird and wonderful world of #crazyhot chiles. Crazyhot, also written as CrazyHot, is directed by entrepreneur / filmmaker Eric Raine, making his directorial debut. For more info, visit the film's official website. Crazyhot is now available to watch on VOD through Amazon Prime and Vimeo. Who wants to try?

Post-Apocalyptic Survival Thriller 'Edge of Extinction' Official Trailer

Edge of Extinction Trailer

"They will hit you with everything they've got." Hundy Gilbert Media has debuted an official trailer for an indie post-apocalyptic survival thriller titled Edge of Extinction, from writer / director Andrew Gilbert. The film is set 15 years after a nuclear World War III, when civilization is gone and humanity barely hangs on. "One boy clings onto life in the desolate countryside of southern Britain, where staying away from other humans has been key to his survival." But one day his isolation comes to an end when he crosses paths with a woman, and also the cannibals of post-apocalyptic survival. Starring Luke Hobson, Georgie Smibert, Chris Kaye, Bryn Hodgen, Nicholas Chambers, & Susan Lee Burton. Such a been there, done that concept with films like The Road. And all the horror films as well. This doesn't seem to offer anything new.

Here's the official trailer (+ poster) for Andrew Gilbert's Edge of Extinction, direct from YouTube:

Edge of Extinction Poster

Set 15 years after World War III, the nuclear winter is over, but mankind is on the verge of extinction. Civilization no longer exists, food is scarce and most eke out a living by stealing and killing. One boy clings onto life in the desolate countryside of southern Britain, where staying away from other humans has been key to his survival. But this self imposed isolation comes to an abrupt end when he crosses paths with another group of survivors and an enemy far more savage than any of them could imagine. Edge of Extinction, also known as The Brink, is both written and directed by English producer / filmmaker Andrew Gilbert, making his second feature film after Infected previously. Produced by Julian Hundy and Andrew Gilbert. This hasn't premiered at any major festivals or elsewhere, as far as we know. Hundy Gilbert Media will release Edge of Extinction direct-to-VOD starting on May 18th this summer. Anyone interested in it?

The Sinful Stop-Motion Pleasures of ‘Raymonde or the Vertical Escape’ 

Welcome to The Queue — your daily distraction of curated video content sourced from across the web. 


To say Raymonde or the Vertical Escape is an odd film is an understatement. Set in an idyllic cottage in the French countryside, the short stop-motion film follows an aging owl (voiced by Yolande Moreau) who has remained celibate her whole life and now longs for companionship. Her only friends are imaginary representations of two historical transgressive figures, Saint Teresa D’Avila and Lady Bathory, who embody the fantasies Raymonde struggles to realize and express freely. She has become obsessed with the mailman, who sneers at her behind her back and calls her a witch. But, even as Raymonde becomes increasingly alienated from her fellow villagers, her tenacity is palpable, and sure enough, as the title promises, she eventually finds a surprising form of liberation.

Raymonde or the Vertical Escape is simultaneously otherworldly and familiar, with lush tactile renderings of pastoral countrysides, cozy gardens, and deep forests. Visually, the film is an absolute pleasure to watch, and the detailed renderings of ladybugs, snap peas, and aphids are enchanting in the proper sense of the word. Touching on themes of isolation and sensuality, the film’s intonations of darker films like The VVitch and Hagazussa are offset with an indelible charm and contagiously good humor.

You can watch Raymonde or the Vertical Escape here:

Who made this?

Raymonde or the Vertical Escape was written and directed by Sarah Van Den Boom, a French animation film director and co-founder of the Papy3D production company, based in Paris. You can browse Papy3D’s Vimeo page hereRaymonde premiered exclusively on Vimeo after a celebrated festival run and a nomination for “Best Animated Short Film” at the 2019 Césars. The film’s discrete cinematography was realized by Simon Filliot, and complimented effortlessly by the twirling music of Pierre Caillet.

More Videos Like This

  • In Deep Waters, another animated short from Papy3D production created in collaboration with the National Film Board of Canada
  • Did someone say “short film by the NFB?” They did? Excellent here’s Blackfly, an absolute banger. This is Canada’s unofficial national anthem.
  • And hey, if you haven’t already, we recommend you check out Rebooted, a stop-motion animated short film that serves as a commentary on the modern status of the art form itself.
  • Want more stop motion? Easy: here’s an Oscar-nominated short film that examines a father-and-son relationship through the art of packing a suitcase.
  • And of course, some witchy content: here’s an explainer on The VVitch.

What’s New to Stream on Hulu for May 2020

Hulu has been stuck in the third-place position when it comes to movie streaming behind Netflix and Amazon Prime because most people still see them strictly as a home for next-day television. They have movies too, though, and more than a few of them are gems that make Hulu a destination beyond last night’s TV shows.

The complete list of new movies and shows hitting Hulu this month — May 2020 — is below, but I wanted to highlight the best of the bunch along with several others worth seeking out.


Hulu Pick of the Month

Solar Opposites (all episodes arrive May 8th) is a new animated series, and while the punny title earns enough points for a watch it’s the presence of co-creator Justin Roiland that seals the deal. He’s half of what makes Rick and Morty (2013-2020) so damn memorable, and judging by the trailer for his latest effort some of that same sharp, rude, intergalactic comedy is present here. Here’s hoping it’s closer to that series than to something like American Dad (2005-2020) which, while I know some of you like it, is still obnoxious as hell. (And here’s also hoping we some kind of crossover between this new endeavor and Rick and Morty…)


3, 2, 1, Action!

The Dark Knight

Action movies are always a solid distraction from real world woes, and three great ones are hitting Hulu this month. The Dark Knight (2008) is the middle entry in Christopher Nolan’s epic trilogy, but even as a standalone it remains an all-timer. Roland Emmerich’s The Patriot (2000) doesn’t get the same kind of love, but it still kicks all kinds of ass with a pissed off Mel Gibson single-handedly defeating the British army after they kill his kid, burn down a church, and continue to wear bright red on the battlefield. Emmerich also delivers the action goods with Universal Soldier (1992) which pits Jean-Claude Van Damme against Dolph Lundgren as super soldiers gone rogue.


Hulu Gets Historical

i don’t know squat about Russian history, but The Great (series premiere May 15th) promises to change that with its 100% give or take accurate look at the rise of Catherine the Great. Elle Fanning and Nicholas Hoult appear to be having an absolute blast, and we’re all probably in good hands with writer Tony McNamara (The Favourite, 2018) pulling the strings.


Great Movies!

Goodfellas

Look, sometimes you just want to watch a great movie. I get it. Martin Scorsese’s GoodFellas (1990) certainly qualifies as it remains one of the man’s best, and even if you’ve seen it a dozen times it’s always worth watching once more. Rocketman (2019) arrives on May 22nd, and I really can’t recommend it enough. As biopics go it’s fantastic. As musicals go it’s fantastic. As movies go, well, it’s fantastic. It’s a Disaster (2012) hits Hulu starting May 15th and is a perfect flick for these crazy days we’re in as it’s about a group of friends who are stuck in their house after the city is targeted with dirty bombs. It’s the blackest of comedies and is a pure delight.


The Complete List

May 1st
Aeon Flux (2005)
Assassination Tango (2003)
Batman Begins (2005)
Billy the Kid (2013)
Bloom: Complete Season 2 (Stan)
Brick Mansions (2014)
The Conjuring (2013)
Crooked Hearts (1991)
The Dark Knight (2008)
Demolition Man (1993)
Escape from Alcatraz (1979)
Friday the 13th Part III (1982)
Friday the 13th Part IV: The Final Chapter (1984)
Gloria (2014)
GoodFellas (1990)
The Graduate (1967)
The Green Mile (1999)
Harry Benson: Shoot First (2016)
House of D (2005)
A Life Less Ordinary (1997)
Megamind (2010)
Men With Brooms (2002)
Molly (1999)
Monster House (2006)
Mutant Species (1995)
Pathology (2008)
The Patriot (2000)
Planet 51 (2009)
Race for Your Life, Charlie Brown (1977)
Sands of Iwo Jima (1950)
Slums of Beverly Hills (1998)
Some Kind of Hero (1982)
Soul Food (1997)
Sprung (1997)
Strategic Air Command (1955)
Tamara (2006)
Tank Girl (1995)
Treasure Hounds (2017)
Universal Soldier (1992)
Walking Tall (1973)
The Whistle Blower (1987)

May 5th
Vikings: Season 6A

May 8th
Into the Dark: Delivered
Solar Opposites
Spaceship Earth (2020)

May 15th
73 Questions: Complete Season 2
Andy Explores: Complete Season 1
Beat Bobby Flay: Complete Seasons 8 and 9
Caribbean Life: Complete Season 15
Chopped: Complete Seasons 37-39
Community en Español: Complete Series
Drag Me: Complete Season 1
Epic Conversations: Complete Season 1
Fast N’ Loud: Complete Season 15
From the Test Kitchen: Complete Season 1
Gold Rush: Complete Season 8
The Great: Series Premiere
The Great Food Truck Race: Complete Seasons 8 and 9
Handcrafted: Complete Season 1
Iconic Characters: Complete Season 2
It’s a Disaster (2012)
It’s Alive with Brad: Complete Season 2
The Little Couple: Complete Seasons 13 and 14
Molly Tries: Complete Season 1
Murder in the Heartland: Complete Season 2
On the Market: Complete Season 1
Open Door: Complete Season 2
Property Brothers: Complete Seasons 12 and 13
Reverse Engineering: Complete Season 1
Street Outlaws: Complete Seasons 8 and 9
Worst Cooks in America: Complete Season 14

May 19th
Like Crazy (2011)
Trial by Fire (2019)

May 20th
Ultimate Tag: Series Premiere

May 22nd
Painter and the Thief (2020)
Premature (2020)
Rocketman (2019)
Top End Wedding (2019)

May 25th
The Tracker (2019)

May 26th
I Still Believe (2020)

May 29th
Disappearance at Clifton Hill (2020)
Ramy: Complete Season 2

Follow all of our monthly streaming guides.

DP Sam McCurdy on Bringing Noir to ‘Game of Thrones’ and ‘Lost In Space’

What is cinema? What is television? With each passing day, the line between the two becomes blurrier and blurrier. Considering that most of us are trapped indoors these days, with zero access to the theatrical experience, everything we consume comes through our televisions or phones or tablets or wristwatches. We spend an exorbitant amount of time debating the delivery system, but behind the scenes, the question of movies versus television is less and less relevant.

Cinematographer Sam McCurdy certainly doesn’t have a dog in this hunt. He shoots stories. ‘Nuff said.

While he was coming up in the business, making flicks like Dog Soldiers, The Descent, and The Hills Have Eyes 2, McCurdy was also cranking out work on the small screen with episodes of Teachers, Wire in the Blood, and The Street. These days he spends most of his time filming shows like Game of Thrones, Lost in Space, Carnival Row, and Pennyworth, but he’s always one phone call away from knocking out a film like Emperor or A United Kingdom.

We may care about the classification of narratives and mediums, but McCurdy sure as hell doesn’t, and neither do most of the folks who hire him for gigs. The reality is there is nothing small about the small screen anymore. What you have in your homes can rival many boutique theaters, and if the big screen experience wants to keep its grip on your dollars, they’re going to need to be a whole heckuva lot more clever in nabbing your attention.

“From my side,” says McCurdy, “there certainly has been an encouragement from producers and showrunners to deliver what’s colloquially called home cinema. They want the big screen look, and they want the big screen feel. We’re making television for people who have sixty-inch sets in their house now.”

The paranoid fear that television is getting tinier and tinier is absurd. While we may catch a show here and there while lying in bed with our iPhone jammed to the bridge of our nose, many are transforming their apartments into complex dens of glorious surround sound, where the no-talking policy is enforced strictly based on the mood of the host. The popcorn comes as wet with butter as your doctor will allow.

“A few years ago,” McCurdy continues, “there was a concern that we were making shows for laptops, or for handhelds, or smartphones. Now we’re thinking about the widescreen that sits in the corner of the room. We want them to experience it.”

HBO takes their acronym (Home Box Office) very seriously. They have confidence that their audience knows the conditions required for their presentation. Find your settings and get to work. They’re bringing cinema to your couch.

“I remember going in for the first day on Game of Thrones [on ‘Blackwater’],” recalls McCurdy, “and sitting down with Dan [Weiss] and David [Benioff]. The only notes they gave me were, ‘Game of Thrones can never be too dark.’ And that was it.”

These orders were a radical departure from what McCurdy had heard before. Shadows became friends. Darkness his ally. Medieval noir, yer god damn right. As the technology of home entertainment evolved, a trust formed between the creators and the audience. You don’t need bright lights to keep pace with the story. You don’t need to squint to see more. All of the story is there in the image.

“This is a new experience in television,” he says. “A show can never be too dark? This is incredible for somebody like me. To be told, ‘There are no real restrictions. We believe in the story. We believe in what we’ve done so far.’ I was given carte blanche to do what I wanted. This trust implores you to do your best work but also to keep it in tone with the rest of the show.”

Shaking bad habits can be challenging. For decades, television looked one way. If a studio was going to spend money on a set, they sure as hell wanted their audience to see that set. Treating the frame as an artistic expression felt counter to the advertisement space they were selling.

“We got so caught up in network television,” says McCurdy. “During the ’80s and the ’90s, studio-based programming relied on people being able to see everything that was going on. It was a transition period for technology. Maybe half of the households in the US or the UK or whereabout had LED screens, but the rest were CRTs. We just got caught up in it.”

With equipment that can challenge the theatrical experience, cinematographers must embrace what was once considered impossible. If the people don’t like it, they won’t watch. It’s a simple equation to comprehend.

“I applaud Game of Thrones,” he continues, “amongst many others, for being moody and allowing us to express ourselves a little more. They had the common sense to see that they could push into people’s front rooms. They could push the limits of what people had become accustomed to, and the show became the biggest show on the planet. So, it obviously worked.”

Ah, but there are some naysayers out there. Last year, during the eighth season episode of Game of Thrones entitled “The Long Night” (shot by Fabian Wagner), many complained that the action, as well as the characters, were impossible to see. The series had taken its philosophy of darkness too far, creating a muddy mess of an hour. McCurdy scoffs at the criticism.

“HBO’s initial response to everything was it can’t be too dark because it’s exactly how we wanted it to be,” explains McCurdy. “That’s the perfect answer. Whether there were a few people out there who thought it was too dark or whether it was a few people out there who were watching it on a laptop as opposed to a television screen or watching it on their phones or something like that. Okay, fair enough. It might not have been to everybody’s tastes, but we’re dealing with a very different area of aesthetics.”

If we’re going to make our homes our theaters, we need to embrace the tools for what they are. You cannot operate your television without adjusting the factory settings. Motion smoothing is a dragon we must slay.

“It’s one thing not catering to people’s tastes,” he continues, “it’s another thing people not understanding what you’re doing with the show. Those of us who love Game of Thrones as a show, we were very happy with what it looked like. The mood that was created in that particular episode was incredible. I swear, if that episode were shown on a movie screen, there would have been no complaints whatsoever.”

The constraints have lifted. With the freedom must come an outburst of creativity. That’s easier said than done.

“With this new era of big-scale television,” says McCurdy, “while it’s still important to make sure you get that big cinema feel for everything, it’s also important to make sure that we give ourselves the time to be creative. The only way we can do that is by not man-managing every single one of our departments by ensuring you get your view across and your ideas across really quickly to everybody.”

We tend to think of cinematography as a one-person job, but like everything on a movie, a team is necessary. When starting a long shoot, McCurdy assembles his gang to move with his mindset, and if they’re to achieve cinematic perfection on Netflix, then they must be on the same philosophical page.

“On Lost in Space,” he says, “I would say to the grips and the gaffer, ‘This is how I want it to look, this is how I want it to feel. All these things should be dark, and all these things should be light.’ So, on a day-to-day basis, they just knew instinctively that they could be darker or they could be lighter, or they could put more of this in or more of that in, or more camera movement.”

When you’re shooting television, schedules are tight. The next episode is coming, and there is little room for mistakes or roadblocks. The way to make through it is to divulge as much information to as many people as possible, fostering an environment where everyone is working toward the same goal: big screen on the small screen.


Lost in Space Season 2 is now streaming on Netflix.

Who Benefits Most from the Oscars Qualifying VOD Releases

While studios and theater owners battle about the issue of day-and-date VOD releases, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences has decided to go easy on the film industry in these difficult times. The organization behind the Oscars announced a temporary change to their rules that will allow straight-to-video and streaming releases to be eligible for Academy Awards.

That’s right, qualifying runs in theaters will not be necessary for consideration this year, but that doesn’t mean AMPAS has completely opened the floodgates for the 93rd Academy Awards. This adjustment is strictly for releases that had theatrical dates in the books before COVID-19 ruined those plans. That means yes to Scoob! but no to the upcoming DTV Scooby-Doo! in King Arthur’s Court.

Speaking of Scoob!, that animated feature and Trolls World Tour are two of the major Hollywood releases that benefit from this decision. They could still each be nominated for Best Animated Feature, and the Trolls sequel might get a Best Original Song nod like the first film did. Meanwhile, Pete Davidson, who jokes about winning an Oscar in the video announcing The King of Staten Island is going straight to VOD, will indeed be eligible to win an Oscar, maybe for Best Original Screenplay.

Could this be an incentive for more studio releases to skip theaters during the pandemic? Perhaps, but I don’t think it’s meant to be. Nor is it meant to be merciful towards Hollywood studios who are making the controversial decision to give the people their entertainment sooner than later. The movies that are most in need of the decision are the indies and the documentaries that don’t have as much choice.

Take the documentary Slay the Dragon, which is one of the best nonfiction films of the year so far. It’s co-directed by Barak Goodman, who earned an Oscar nomination in 2001 for Scottsboro: An American Tragedy, so the Academy pedigree is there. Magnolia planned for the doc to hit theaters and VOD simultaneously on April 3rd, but with the closing of most cinemas, the film only landed on the small screen.

Could the doc have delayed its release? Yes, but it’s presumably more of a burden for small distributors like Magnolia to change its plans and postpone a film due for VOD release, especially as abruptly as the case with Slay the Dragon. Plus, this particular doc focuses on a political subject matter — gerrymandering — that’s of interest at this precise moment in time due to it being an election year and a census year.

Under its intended release, a doc of its caliber would have been strongly considered. No, the original day-and-date release would not have been a factor. The Oscars don’t actually bar films that open theatrically and on VOD on the same day, so long as the theatrical release includes screens in LA and NYC (Trolls World Tour still wouldn’t have counted if none of its drive-in showings were in those cities). Without the rule exception, Slay the Dragon would have been unfortunately disqualified.

Another film that may be cheering now is Crip Camp, the Netflix documentary chronicling the history of the disabled rights movement. Not only is it a phenomenal work, comparable to the Oscar-nominated feature How to Survive a Plague (the two films share a producer in Howard Gertler), but it’s the second doc presented by Barack Obama and Michelle Obama through their company Higher Ground Productions. The first with their name on it, American Factory, just so happened to win the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature this year.

And there are plenty of others. Neon, which had three documentaries shortlisted in the Best Documentary Feature category last year and went on to earn two nominations for one of those films, Honeyland (the doc was also a contender for Best International Feature), would also be hurt without the temporary rule change. Next month, the distributor will see the release of two docs, Spaceship Earth and The Painter and the Thief (the latter is my favorite of the year so far), and while they’re attempting some interesting ideas for projecting the films outside the home, they wouldn’t have been able to include a proper LA or NYC run as part of that.

Regarding the matter of qualifying runs overall, by the way, the Academy has also widened its scope for eligibility. Once theaters open, movies will be able to qualify not just with runs in LA and NYC but also in Atlanta, Chicago, Miami, and the San Francisco Bay Area. Hopefully, that part sticks. Additionally, online screenings of films through virtual film festival efforts will be allowed an exemption as well.

The special circumstances for this year’s movies are also likely to help smaller movies in general, not just documentaries. If the pandemic extends into the fall, aka awards season, then major Hollywood releases may be held for consideration next year. Especially if the big theater chains have anything to say about it. That could potentially allow for indies to have a better shot than normal at the Oscars.

This could be A24’s year again with Lee Isaac Chung’s Minari already a decent contender given its dual Grand Jury Prize and Audience Award wins at Sundance last January. The same company has a new film by Sofia Coppola — On the Rocks — set for the fall. As for Neon, they could maintain they weren’t a fluke with their Parasite success this year and get another Best Picture nomination with Ammonite.

Of course, Netflix, whose aforementioned Crip Camp also won an award at Sundance, is sure to benefit the most. That is if they can prove they’d had plans for qualifying runs for all of their Oscar hopefuls, such as David Fincher’s Mank, Ron Howard’s Hillbilly Elegy, and Spike Lee’s Da 5 Bloods, all due in the fall, plus another acclaimed doc out of Sundance, Kirsten Johnson’s Dick Johnson is Dead.

Depending on how the year continues — but even going by how the industry has already had to adapt and adjust during the COVID0-19 pandemic — the 93rd Academy Awards are going to be an interesting look back at a year unlike any other in the history of cinema. Or at least in the history of the Oscars. Who knows whether the Academy’s special allowance will be reflected in the nominees come January. But at least we’ll understand that they tried to make things fair.

Wednesday 29 April 2020

The Ending of ‘Spider-Man: Homecoming’ Explained

Affirmation as a panacea for shame is the crux of Spider-Man: Homecoming. Upon receiving incredible physical abilities after being bit by a radioactive spider, Peter Parker (Tom Holland) behaved the way any nerdy teenager would behave. He went mad with power, using his gifts to score quick cash and raise his esteem in the eyes of others. As a result, he did not act against a criminal in flight from a heist, and his Uncle Ben was murdered by the very same thug mere minutes, hours, or days later.

We don’t have the details, at least as how they pertain to the Marvel Cinematic Universe iteration. We have to infer most of Spider-Man’s backstory from the comic books or the previous two cinematic adaptations or the cartoons or the short-lived live-action television series. It’s common knowledge at this point. While we give credit to Marvel Studios for doing the due diligence of constructing their universe one superhero solo film at a time, when it came to Spider-Man, we just wanted to skip to the good stuff.

Eager to please, Peter Parker happily bounded into Captain America: Civil War and got to work pleasing his new surrogate father figure, Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.). Was he on the right side of the conflict? He’s a kid. How the hell should he know? Parker just wants a dad to be proud.

Throughout Spider-Man: Homecoming, humoring Tony Stark is challenging. For one thing, Stark is not Uncle Ben. For another, Parker can no longer sit back and watch the world pass by. The last time he did that, his Aunt May (Marisa Tomei) was widowed. The Vulture (Michael Keaton) and his black market Chitauri arms dealing must be thwarted, and if Stark refuses to let Parker peek behind the scenes of his (maybe-in-progress) operation, then Spider-Man is compelled to get in on the action.

Without the aid of Stark or his fancy-schmancy spider-suit, Parker takes down the Vulture wearing nothing but his Long Johns, plus a little assistance from his man in the chair (Jacob Batalon). Of course, there is a cost to this heroism. Parker was crushing hard on Liz (Laura Harrier), the Vulture’s daughter, and with papa behind bars, she is forced to flee the state. Parker ditched her during the Homecoming dance, and all he can do is accept her rightful disdain and confusion. The life of a costumed crime-fighter contains very little room for romance.

Having saved the day, Spider-Man is welcomed into the Avengers, with Stark going as far as to assemble a press conference in the kid’s honor. Parker believes it to be one more test from Stark and elects to return to his high school life and attempt to juggle his vigilante duties with homework. He cannot be swayed even when presented with a spider suit upgrade.

The suit is a spin on the Iron Spider costume first worn by the character in the comic book version of Civil War, written by Mark Millar and illustrated by Steve McNiven. However, the suit itself was designed by Joe Quesada based on an initial sketch by Chris Bachalo. The MCU version relies on Tony’s ever-increasing love for nano-technology. As far as the billionaire playboy philanthropist is concerned, no Avenger should be bothered with the grueling task of putting their pants on one leg at a time when the press of the button can do the job for them.

Parker could dominate the five boroughs in this shiny new armor, but he’s barely adapted to his previous Stark upgrade. Having finally struck a friendly dynamic with Karen, his suit’s AI program (voiced by Jennifer Connelly and cousin to J.A.R.V.I.S./Vision, who is voiced/played by Connelly’s real-life husband, Paul Bettany), Parker desires to master the 1.0 version before jumping over to the 2.0. He’ll get his chance to do that in Avengers: Infinity War.

Stark pivots quickly enough from Parker’s rejection, finding a little pride in the kid’s desire to make it on his own. Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) is aghast with Parker slinking away, as she’s the one responsible for corralling the press. Stark sees his moment, catching an engagement ring tossed by Happy (Jon Favreau), who has been holding onto that rock for the last several years (a clever nudge-nudge-wink-wink to the director’s shepherding of the Marvel Cinematic Universe).

We don’t see it happen, but we can infer the engagement between Stark and Potts occurs in front of a few dozen flashing lightbulbs. Making an event out of a proposal tracks with Stark’s ego. Potts scoffs at such behavior, but she still sticks with the recovering letch. Iron Man needs more than Happy while he recovers from the multiple Civil War tragedies. He needs Potts and Peter to drive his fight.

Spider-Man: Homecoming concludes with our Avenger friends feeling fairly cheery. There’s no reason to fret. All the bad guys are in jail. Thanos? What’s a Thanos? Another name for another day.

During the mid-credits stinger, we see the Vulture in prison behaving like the cock of the walk. He’s confronted by fellow inmate Mac Gargan, aka the Scorpion (Michael Mando), who has heard rumors that the Vulture knows the secret identity of Spider-Man. The Vulture tells Gargan that if he knew who he was, he’d already be dead. As he walks away, a smile splits his face.

The Vulture is not going to let some other punk have his way with his boy. If anyone is going to slap some pain into Parker, it will be him. The villain has garnered a little respect for the teenager. Parker bested him at his game. The Vulture won’t die behind bars. He’ll get out and eventually find his way to Peter Parker (after a quick side-quest into Morbius).

Peter Parker may recognize the possibility of a father-figure in Tony Stark, but he’s also picked up one in the Vulture. With no Green Goblin/Norman Osborn in this realm, the Vulture operates as his blue-collar doppelganger, protecting Parker from the horrors of the world so that he can bend the kid to his will. Cold, cynical logic will eventually open Parker’s eyes to the truth of the world. Give the Vulture time, he’s got more lessons to impart.

The final post-credits scene ends Spider-Man: Homecoming on a laugh. We see another chunk of Coach Wilson (Hannibal Buress)’s governmentally required video featuring the wanted criminal and boy scout dope Captain America (Chris Evans). The super-soldier is fulfilling his duty as a civil servant, instructing the youth of America about the power of patience. Sometimes its the key to victory, sometimes it amounts to very little. Think on that, fanboys.

Cap gets the last word of the film with a question, “How many more of these?” The answer is simple. As many as the Disney/Sony partnership can sustain. You keep showing up and they’ll keep coming. The Spider-Man: Homecoming sequel, Spider-Man: Far From Home, marked the 23rd entry in the MCU and it scored a billion dollars at the box office. They’ll play house, or Home, for at least one more flick.

The History of ‘The Goonies’ Sequel

Every movie deserves a chance to prove itself on its own terms, but some ideas seem bad from the get-go. Take, for example, a potential sequel to The Goonies, which is both unnecessary and entirely possible.

Talk of a follow-up to the iconic ‘80s adventure movie, which centers around a group of kids who embark on a dangerous expedition to find One-Eyed Willy’s hidden treasure, has been rumored for over 30 years. But the subject came up again during a virtual reunion event, and Steven Spielberg revealed that there have been some recent conversations about making one.

However, Spielberg, who produced the Richard Donner-helmed 1985 original, also said that no idea that’s been proposed so far has been good enough to justify another movie, so it could be a while before a follow-up comes to fruition. The good news is that the filmmakers don’t want to sour the legacy of the beloved first film with a bad cash-grab sequel.

Rumors of a Goonies sequel can be traced back to 1987, the same year that a video game titled The Goonies II was released. Unlike its predecessor (a video game based on the movie that only retailed in Japan), the globally-distributed Goonies II cartridge featured an original story centered around the gang being kidnapped by the Fratellis. Naturally, this fuelled speculation that another movie was on the way, but in the end, the game proved to be its own thing.

Efforts to make an actual sequel became more apparent in the mid-2000s. As documented by Ain’t It Cool News, Spielberg reportedly had an idea in 2004 that Jeff Cohen described as “funny.” Director Richard Donner and most of the cast were interested in returning as well, but the required budget to bring the movie to life proved to be an issue. Cohen, who played “Chunk,” also said that other studios were interested in inheriting the project, but Warner Bros. wasn’t willing to hand over the rights to another party.

Following years of cast and crew members both confirming and denying that a sequel was in the works, some new Goonies projects were announced in 2007. They just weren’t planned as movies. Donner announced that he was working on a comic book miniseries called Goonies: The Search for Sloth, which would take place several years after the events of the movie and follow the gang as they set out to save Sloth, who’d disappeared under suspicious circumstances. The series never materialized.

That same year, there was also some talk of a sequel animated series for Cartoon Network. Little is known about the project, but apparently the original cast wanted too much money for their likenesses to be used, and the series fell through. However, it wasn’t the first time that an animated series had been considered. A sequel cartoon called The Goonies: The Animated Series was supposedly pitched back in 1996 but was shelved due to story problems and a general lack of development. As noted by Fandom, the only trace of the series is its logo, from an archived version of the original announcement.

One of the main reasons why the sequel hasn’t gained any serious traction is because everyone is loyal to Donner, and he is in his twilight years. While it’s possible that another filmmaker could take the reins, the original players don’t want to make it without the original director. But he isn’t getting any younger, and that’s why Corey Feldman doesn’t think a sequel is possible.

“He’s the driving force behind it. He says it’s still alive. But as we all know…When you get to that age, things slow down quite a bit. There is a big possibility that he might not want to keep driving it. So, I think without him, it doesn’t happen. And every day that passes, that he doesn’t do it, there is less and less chance that it is ever going to happen at all.”

Still, never say never. Adam Goldberg — the mastermind behind The Goldbergs, the ultimate ’80s nostalgia sitcom — recently claimed that he’s been working on a sequel for years, and he even had a meeting about it with Donner before the COVID-19 pandemic ruined their plans. “THE GOONIES 2 WILL happen when life resumes,” he tweeted. “Promise!!!”

The Goonies sequel hasn’t gained enough steam throughout the years to suggest that there’s any serious interest in making it. Sure, it’s clear that the filmmakers have had conversations about it — and there appears to be a willingness to make the movie if the right idea comes along — but they’ve had over three decades to figure out a story, and none of their ideas have been good enough, it seems.

Maybe the sequel will never happen, but Fox is producing a television series that will please fans of the movie without making a potentially lesser-quality sequel. Earlier this year, Variety reported that the as-yet-untitled show will follow a substitute teacher who helps a group of young students make a shot-for-shot remake of the ‘80s classic. An affectionate tribute show seems like a better idea than a sequel.

Trailer for Basketball Legend 'Manchild: The Schea Cotton Story' Doc

Manchild: The Schea Cotton Story Trailer

"Schea's story is important to be told…" 1091 Media has released an official trailer for a sports documentary called Manchild: The Schea Cotton Story, which originally premiered back in 2016 at the Los Angeles Film Festival. This is yet another basketball biopic doc, joining recent films like The Legend of Swee' Pea, A Kids From Coney Island, and Jump Shot. Plus with Michael Jordan series "The Last Dance" being watched by fans worldwide, and the pandemic shutting down sports this year, docs like this are finding an audience. Manchild is about a basketball legend named Schea Cotton - who grew up in California and was already a star in 7th grade, but he never made it into the NBA despite his legendary talent. The film "chronicles the circuitous life of legendary Los Angeles hoops megastar Schea Cotton" with an "in-depth look at the epic rise and struggles of the most celebrated high school athlete of our time." What a crazy story. Take a look below.

Official trailer (+ poster) for Eric Herbert's doc Manchild: The Schea Cotton Story, from YouTube:

Manchild: The Schea Cotton Story Poster

Manchild is a documentary about a Los Angeles basketball legend by the name of Schea Cotton. There have been many stories told about Schea, and all of the ones about what he did on the court are true. This time though Schea and the people closest to him tell the story about what REALLY happened. A star studded documentary featuring Scoop Jackson, Paul Pierce, Baron Davis, Ron Artest, Tyson Chandler, Jason Hart, Stephen Jackson and Elton Brand to name a few. There is no such thing as a "lock" for the NBA because if that were the case Schea Cotton would be there, no doubt. Manchild: The Schea Cotton Story is directed by filmmaker Eric 'Ptah' Herbert, making his directorial debut; he also edited and co-produced the film Check Point. This originally premiered at the Los Angeles Film Festival back in 2016, but hasn't shown up at other festivals else since then. For more info, visit the film's Facebook page. 1091 Media will finally release Manchild: The Schea Cotton Story direct-to-VOD starting on June 23rd this summer.

AMC Theatres Trolls Universal Over ‘Trolls’ Release

Just a few weeks ago, AMC Theatres was in the news for its struggle to pay its bills. Now the cinema chain, which is on the verge of filing for bankruptcy, is making not just threats but full-blown strikes against one of the major Hollywood studios. In an open letter to the head of Universal Pictures, AMC’s CEO, Adam Aron, announced a worldwide boycott of the studio’s movies.

“Effectively immediately,” reads the letter, addressed to Chairwoman Donna Langley, “AMC will no longer play any Universal movies in any of our theaters in the United States, Europe, or the Middle East. This policy affects any and all Universal movies per se, goes into effect today, and as our theaters reopen, and is not some hollow or ill-considered threat.”

Here’s what led to this decision: as movie theaters began restricting attendance and then were forced to close because of the COVID-19 pandemic, Hollywood began moving most of its film releases to future dates. Universal’s latest Fast & Furious installment, F9, for instance, was delayed almost a year. Instead of opening on May 22, 2020, the sequel won’t hit screens until April 2, 2021.

But Universal also chose to maintain the release date of one of its upcoming titles by dropping the animated sequel Trolls World Tour onto VOD the same day as its theatrical opening — which only consisted of drive-in showings due to indoor cinemas being closed. Since then, the studio has also slated Judd Apatow’s latest, The King of Staten Island, for a similar release in June.

AMC’s response (without coordination from the National Associaton of Theatre Owners), came not after Universal’s announcement of the Trolls World Tour strategy but following NBCUniversal’s revelation of the movie’s financial figures. And not its initial record-breaking numbers but last week’s disclosure to the Wall Street Journal that the movie grossed $95 million in rentals over 19 days.

Obviously, NBCUniversal wanted to celebrate that amount as a win because that’s what corporations do. This was a relatively unprecedented gamble on their part, and it worked. The release was a success. But that’s not actually the issue. Here’s the quote from CEO Jeff Shell that really got AMC’s goat: “As soon as theaters reopen, we expect to release movies on both formats.”

Now, releasing some movies in theaters and releasing some movies straight to VOD is not even a new idea for any studio. The problem for AMC and theatre owners as a whole is when a movie is released simultaneously on both at the same time — that’s called “day-and-date” release. Many indie distributors do it. Even Lionsgate has done it. Sony once had to do it for a special situation.

Shell doesn’t say anything about releasing titles day-and-date after theaters reopen. He’s just pointing out that there may be some bigger releases that avoid theatrical release in favor of VOD. Trolls World Tour likely performed better the way it went out than it would have with a normal release because of the circumstances and because of box office trends with animated features lately.

Warner Bros. may come to the same conclusion with Scoob!, the animated Scooby-Doo film that will skip its originally intended wide theatrical release for a day-and-date opening next month. Disney has already been experiencing the benefits of dropping some of its movie releases to stream on Disney+ instead of going to theaters. Artemis Fowl will be their next to do so, this June.

Despite the claims in the AMC letter, the attack does appear to be a petty one, and it’s also hard to believe given that AMC would be giving up millions of dollars by not playing such movies as F9, the James Bond installment No Time to Die, and Minions: The Rise of Gru (a much more highly-anticipated animated sequel, hence its theatrical release hold rather than going the Trolls 2 route).

Yet doing so would also hurt the studio given that AMC is the largest movie theater chain in North America. Meanwhile, AMC needs NBCUniversal in the form of Fandango, the ticketing service partly owned by the media corporation. Again, that’s something that would suck for both of them if all partnerships between them ceased. AMC could be shooting their own industry in the foot.

For decades, there’s been an understanding that the theater industry needs Hollywood, and to a lesser extent there’s been an understanding that Hollywood needs the theater industry. Studios have gotten away with bullying and getting their own way sometimes because of the slightly unbalanced interdependence, but the industries have an unbreakable mutualistic bond.

Universal very well might have made more money by releasing Trolls World Tour in theaters and receiving half its box office gross, and then releasing the movie to VOD and receiving additional income there. Typically, it’s better for studios to have such tiered earnings windows, with theatrical release functioning as marketing for subsequent platforms as much as it’s its own moneymaking tier.

These are difficult times right now, and every company and industry is trying to do what’s best for the moment and the future. It’s probably not the best context for such a move, but this may be the only opportunity for AMC and NATO to have an upper hand and pressure Universal and the rest of Hollywood to stay away from further day-and-date releases after this is all over.

Unfortunately for AMC, their public negotiating strategy is all too transparent and they’re receiving more of the scrutiny from media big and small. Personally, I love my closest AMC option over the local competition, I subscribe to their monthly A-list plan, and I don’t want to see them go out of business. I also want to see Jurassic World: Dominion on one of AMC’s Dolby screens.

Fortunately for me and everyone else, they’ll make up. There’ll be some dealings to make it happen, just as there are when cable companies and networks dispute and settle following blackouts and threats of blackouts. Perhaps this won’t blow over as soon as July 10th, when Universal is still expected to put out the next Purge sequel, The Forever Purge, but it probably will if that date holds.

Ironically or intentionally, The Forever Purge would be another easy title to just drop to VOD if theaters aren’t actually open by midsummer. Then again, the Purge movies are among the few franchises that continue to exponentially increase worldwide box office with each installment. Trolls World Tour might look like the industry gamechanger now, but The Forever Purge could be instead.

Universal did make a bit of clarification in their rebuttal to AMC following the boycott announcement: “We absolutely believe in the theatrical experience and have made no statement to the contrary,” the studio’s official statement reads. “Going forward, we expect to release future films directly to theaters, as well as on PVOD when that distribution outlet makes sense.”

When that distribution outlet makes sense might be for the time being. But it’s clearly something that’s necessary for Universal and for consumers right now. The VOD and general home entertainment market is becoming bare with regards to major titles, and that just means Netflix, in particular, will continue to rise during the pandemic, and neither the studios nor theatre owners want that.

The industries need to look at this all as, hopefully, temporary measures. Just as theater owners shouldn’t be concerned about the new Academy Awards concession to allow straight-to-VOD titles to qualify this year — with strict guidelines that this is a special circumstance and films are only eligible if they’d had a theatrical date already — they shouldn’t be up in arms over the rest.

That said, Hollywood studios ought to be more conscious of what’s going on with movie theaters and their staff during the pandemic. Chains as big as AMC and independent cinemas alike are hurting and have few options the way studios and distributors have. The ones kicking back and finding ways to share what little wealth is to be made right now are doing the right thing. 

Capitalism or not, we’re all in this together right now. And most of us, whether we’re makers, exhibitors, or viewers of movies, can’t wait to see those images on the big screen again as soon as we’re all safely permitted to do so. In the meantime, if we’re going to be complaining about each other, here’s an open letter to AMC from me: your popcorn is the worst; spend this time to fix that.

Copyright © Cinenus | Powered by Blogger

Design by Anders Noren | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com